Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative morphology of populations of Monstera Adans. (Araceae) from natural forest fragments in Northeast Brazil using elliptic Fourier Analysis of leaf outlines

  • Published:
Kew Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A comparative study of the leaf outline morphometrics of Monstera adansonii var. klotzschiana, M. adansonii var. laniata and M. praetermissa was carried out. The study focused on populations in isolated montane humid (brejo) forests of Ceará state in Northeast Brazil and compared them with populations from Amazonia and the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Digitised outlines were prepared from a total of 1,695 field-collected leaf images from 20 populations, and elliptic Fourier analysis was used to generate matrices of coefficients, from which six shape variables (principal components) were extracted using Principal Components Analysis. Intra-population variability and inter-population differences were analysed with multivariate distance methods. Separate analyses were carried out for each of three leaf size classes (juvenile, submature, mature) because of the strong heteroblasty typical of this genus. Juvenile leaves were the least variable size class within populations of M. adansonii var. klotzschiana. The shape variables expressed very similar types of variation in all three size classes. The Ceará brejo populations of M. adansonii var. klotzschiana showed significant differences between mature leaf outlines in all pairwise comparisons; the Pacatuba population was the most distinct. The Ceará populations did not cluster together exclusively. In all three size classes, populations clustered together into their taxonomic groups, most clearly so in mature leaves. No correlation between morphological and geographic distance matrices was found, nor between morphological and molecular distance. The study showed that leaf outline shape is a practicable and useful quantitative trait for studying morphological variability at species, varietal and population levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ab’Sáber, A. N. (1982). The paleoclimate and paleoecology of Brazilian Amazônia. In: G. T. Prance (ed.), Biological diversification in the Tropics. Columbia University Press, New York. Pp. 41 – 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrade, I. M. & Mayo, S. J. (1998). Dynamic shoot morphology in Monstera adansonii Schott var. klotzschiana (Schott) Madison (Araceae). Kew Bull. 532: 399 – 417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____, ____, Van den Berg, C., Fay, M., Chester, M., Lexer, C. & Kirkup, D. (2007). Genetic variation in populations of Monstera adansonii Schott (Araceae) from natural forest fragments in Northeast Brazil estimated with AFLP molecular markers. Ann. Bot. 100: 1143 – 1154.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade-Lima, D. de (1982). Present-Day Forest Refuges in Northeastern Brasil. In: G. T. Prance (ed.), Biological Diversification in the Tropics. Columbia University Press, New York. Pp. 245 – 251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges-Nojosa, D. M. & Caramaschi, U. (2003). Composição e Análise Comparativa da Diversidade e das Afinidades Biogeográficas dos Lagartos e Anfisbenídeos (Squamata) dos Brejos Nordestinos. In: I. Leal, J. M. C. Silva & M. Tabarelli (eds.), Ecologia e Conservação da Caatinga. ed. 1, 1: 489 – 540. Recife.

  • Cannon, C. H. & Manos, P. S. (2001). Combining and comparing morphometric shape descriptors with a molecular phylogeny: the case of fruit type evolution in Bornean Lithocarpus (Fagaceae). Syst. Biol. 50(6): 860 – 880.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferson, S., Rohlf, F. J. & Koehn, R. K. (1985). Measuring shape variation of two-dimensional outlines. Syst. Zool. 34(1): 59 – 68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueiredo, M. A. (1997). Vegetação. In: Fundação Instituto de Planejamento do Ceará (IPLANCE). Atlas do Ceará. Fortaleza. Pp. 28 – 29.

  • Furuta, N., Ninomiya, S., Takahashi, S., Ohmori, H. & Ukai, Y. (1995). Quantitative evaluation of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) leaflet shape by principal component scores based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. Breeding Sci. 45: 315 – 320.

    Google Scholar 

  • GIMP (2006). http://www.gimp.org. Version 2.2.4 by S. Kimball & P. Mattis.

  • Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T. & Ryan, P. D. (2001). PAST: Palaeontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 41: 9; http://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past

    Google Scholar 

  • IBGE (1985). Atlas nacional do Brasil. IBGE. Rio de Janeiro.

  • ____ (2005) http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/presidencia/noticias/noticia_impressão.php?id_noticia 06/07/2005

  • Iwata, H. & Ukai, Y. (2002). SHAPE: A computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. J. Hered. 93: 384 – 385.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ____, Nesumi, H., Ninomiya, S., Takano, Y. & Ukai, Y. (2002). The evaluation of genotype x environment interactions of citrus leaf morphology using image analysis and elliptic Fourier descriptors. Breeding Sci. 52: 243 – 251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R. J., Ciofani, K. M. & Miramontes, L. C. (2002). Lines, outlines, and landmarks: morphometric analyses of leaves of Acer rubrum, Acer saccharinum (Aceraceae) and their hybrid. Taxon 51: 475 – 492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, S. & Sinha, N. (2004). Shaping up: the genetic control of leaf shape. Curr. Opin. Pl. Biol. 7: 65 – 72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madison, M. (1977). A revision of Monstera (Araceae). Contr. Gray Herb. 207: 1 – 101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, S. J. (1983). Aspectos da fitogeografia das Araceae bahianas. In: Anais XXXIV Congresso Nacional de Botânica do Brasil, Porto Alegre, Brasil 2: 215 – 227. Diretoria da Sociedade, Porte Alegre.

  • McLellan, T. (1993). The roles of heterochrony and heteroblasty in the diversification of leaf shapes in Begonia dregei (Begoniaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 807: 796 – 804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, P. E., Barreto, A. M. F. & Suguio, K. (1999). Late Pleistocene/Holocene climatic and vegetational history of the Brazilian caatinga: the fossil dunes of the middle São Francisco River. Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol. 152: 319 – 337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pôrto, K. C., Cabral, J. J. P. & Tabarelli, M. (2004). Brejos de altitude em Pernambuco e Paraíba: história natural, ecologia e conservação. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raveloson, H., Le Minor, J.-M., Rumpler, Y. & Schmittbuhl, M. (2005). Shape of the lateral mandibular outline in Lemuridae: a quantitative analysis of variability using elliptical Fourier analysis. Folia Primatol. 76: 245 – 261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, T. (1983). Monstera tenuis (Chirravaca, Mano de Tigre, Monstera). Pp. 278 – 280 In: D. H. Janzen, Costa Rican Natural History. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodal, M. J. N., Sales, M. F. & Mayo, S. J. (1998). Florestas Serranas de Pernambuco: Localização dos remanescentes dos brejos de altitude. Imprensa Universitária, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, F. J. (2004). TpsDig Version 1.40. Digitizing software. http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/

  • ____ (2005). NTSYSpc: Numerical Taxonomy System ver. 2.20d, Exeter Publishing, Ltd. Setauket, NY. http://www.exetersoftware.com/cat/ntsyspc/ntsyspc.html

    Google Scholar 

  • ____ (2006). Morphometrics at SUNY Stony Brook: website http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/

  • ____ & Archie, J. W. (1984). A comparison of Fourier methods for the description of wing shape in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Syst. Zool. 33(3): 302 – 317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumpunen, K. & Bartish, I. V. (2002). Comparison of differentiation estimates based on morphometric and molecular data, exemplified by various leaf shape descriptors and RAPDs in the genus Chaenomeles (Rosaceae). Taxon 51: 69 – 82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sales, M. F., Mayo, S. J. & Rodal, M. J. N. (1998). Plantas vasculares das florestas serranas de Pernambuco: Um checklist da flora ameaçada dos brejos de altitude, Pernambuco Brasil. Imprensa Universitária, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampaio, V. S. B., Giulietti, A. M., Virginio, J. & Gamarra-Rojas, C. F. L. (2002). Vegetação e flora da caatinga. Associação Plantas do Nordeste (APNE), Centro Nordestino de Informação Sobre Plantas (CNIP), Recife.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slice, D. (2008). Morpheus et al. Multiplatform software for morphometric research. http://www.morphometrics.org/id6.html

  • Tatsuta, H., Mizota, K. & Akimoto, S.-I. (2004). Relationship between size and shape in the sexually dimorphic beetle Prosopocoilus inclinatus (Coleoptera: Lucanidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 81: 219 – 233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamanaka, N., Ninomiya, S., Hoshi, M., Tsubokura, Y., Yano, M., Nagamura, Y., Sasaki, T. & Harada, K. (2001). An informative linkage map of soybean reveals QTLs for flowering time, leaflet morphology and regions of segregation distortion. DNA Res. 8: 61 – 72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshioka, Y., Iwata, H., Ohsawa, R. & Ninomiya, S. (2004). Analysis of petal shape variation of Primula sieboldii by elliptic Fourier descriptors and principal component analysis. Ann. Bot. 94: 657 – 664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are most grateful to the following organisations and persons for their essential help: FUNCAP (Fundaçao Cearense de Amparo à Pesquisa), FAPESB (Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia, WWF Brasil, Kew Latin America Research Fellowships Programme (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew), Margaret Mee Fellowships Programme (Fundação Botânica Margaret Mee, Rio de Janeiro, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew), Ministério do Meio Ambiente (IBAMA, permit number 001/2004, 042/04), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científica e Tecnológica (CNPq, MCT permit number, 168/01), Dr Ana Maria Giulietti, Dr Robyn Cowan, Anna Haigh, Dr Jean-Jacques de Granville and the staff of the CAY herbarium in French Guiana, Bertrand Goguillon and the staff of IRD (French Guiana) for permission to collect, Dr Denis Barabé, Thales Alves Ribeiro, Sr. José Teodoro Soares, Rector of the Universidade Estadual do Vale do Acaraú (UVA), Sobral-CE.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. J. Mayo.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOC 174 KB)

Appendix

Appendix

List of voucher specimens.

Voucher specimens are deposited in the following herbaria: EAC = Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil; HUEFS = Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil; K = Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, United Kingdom; UVA = Herbarium of the Universidade Estadual Vale do Acaraú, Sobral, Ceará. Population codes are given in bold.

Monstera adansonii Schott var. klotzschiana (Schott) Madison

KBAR: Brazil, Bahia, Serra da Copioba: I. M. Andrade 2771 (HUEFS), I. M. Andrade 2772 (HUEFS), I. M. Andrade 2783 (HUEFS), I. M. Andrade 2784 (EAC), I. M. Andrade 1996 (HUEFS).

KBAS: Brazil, Bahia, Ubaitaba: I. M. Andrade 2075 (HUEFS), I. M. Andrade 2077 (EAC), I. M. Andrade 2078 (HUEFS), I. M. Andrade 2079 (HUEFS).

KCEma: Brazil, Ceará, Maranguape: I. M. Andrade 867 (UVA).

KCEpa: Brazil, Ceará, Pacatuba: I. M. Andrade 685 (HUEFS), I. M. Andrade 706 (EAC), I. M. Andrade 707 (HUEFS).

KCEub: Brazil, Ceará, São Benedito: I. M. Andrade 602 (EAC), I. M. Andrade 605 (EAC), I. M. Andrade 2613 (HUEFS). Ubajara: I. M. Andrade 2677 (HUEFS), I. M. Andrade 2680 (HUEFS), I. M. Andrade 2709 (HUEFS), I. M. Andrade 2722 (HUEFS).

KESli: Brazil, Espírito Santo, Linhares: I. M. Andrade 1618 (EAC), I. M. Andrade 1622 (EAC), I. M. Andrade 1628 (EAC).

KESst: Brazil, Espírito Santo, Santa Tereza: I. M. Andrade 764 (HUEFS), I. M. Andrade 767 (HUEFS).

KFG: French Guiana, Petit Saut: I. M. Andrade 2800 (EAC, HUEFS, K), I. M. Andrade 2802 (EAC, HUEFS, K).

KPA: Pará, Acará: I. M. Andrade 2385 (HUEFS), I. M. Andrade 2388 (HUEFS).

KPER: Brazil, Pernambuco, Recife: I. M. Andrade 1881 (HUEFS).

KRJ: Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, Vista Chinesa: I. M. Andrade 2222 (HUEFS), I. M. Andrade 2228 (HUEFS), I. M. Andrade 2230 (HUEFS).

KSP: Brazil, São Paulo, Bertioga: I. M. Andrade 2121 (HUEFS), I. M. Andrade 2137 (HUEFS).

Monstera adansonii Schott var. laniata (Schott) Madison

LBAIlh: Brazil, Bahia, Ilhéus, Centro de Pesquisas do Cacau (CEPEC): I. M. Andrade 1983 (UVA).

LBAUb: Brazil, Bahia, Ubaitaba: I. M. Andrade 1962 (UVA).

LFG: French Guiana, Cayenne: I. M. Andrade 2815 (K).

LPET: Brazil, Pernambuco, Tapacurá: I. M. Andrade 1933 (UVA).

Monstera praetermissa E. G. Gonç. & Temponi

PBAR: Brazil, Bahia, Serra da Copioba: I. M. Andrade 2740 (UVA).

PCEbat: Brazil, Ceará, Serra de Baturité, I. M. Andrade s.n. (UVA).

PCEib: Brazil, Ceará, Ibiapina, I. M. Andrade 2529 (UVA).

PCEub: Brazil, Ceará, Ubajara, I. M. Andrade 2630 (UVA).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andrade, I.M., Mayo, S.J., Kirkup, D. et al. Comparative morphology of populations of Monstera Adans. (Araceae) from natural forest fragments in Northeast Brazil using elliptic Fourier Analysis of leaf outlines. Kew Bull 63, 193–211 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12225-008-9032-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12225-008-9032-z

Key words

Navigation