Abstract
Wolbachia are maternally inherited symbiotic bacteria capable of inducing an extensive range of reproductive abnormalities in their hosts, including cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI). Its density (concentration) is likely to influence the penetrance of CI in incompatible crosses. The variations of Wolbachia density could also be linked with phage WO density. We determined the relative density (relative concentration) of prophage WO orf7 and Wolbachia (phage-to-bacteria ratio) during early developmental and adult stages of singly infected Aedes albopictus mosquito (Wolbachia A-infected) by using real-time quantitative PCR. Phage WO and Wolbachia did not develop at the same rate. Relative Wolbachia density (bacteria-to-host ratio) was high later in development (adult stages) whilst relative prophage WO density (phage-to-bacteria ratio) was low in the adult stages. Furthermore, 12-d-old adults of singly infected female mosquito had the highest Wolbachia density. In contrast, the larval stage 4 (L4) contained the highest prophage WO-B orf7 density. The association of hosts-Wolbachia-phage among diverse species is different. Thus, if phage and Wolbachia are involved in CI mechanism, the information of this association should be acquired for each specific type of organism for future use of population replacement or gene drive system.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CI:
-
cytoplasmic incompatibility
- EDTA:
-
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
- PCR:
-
polymerase chain reaction
- RH:
-
relative humidity
- RTQ-PCR:
-
real-time quantitative PCR
- STE:
-
sodium chloride-Tris-EDTA
References
Bordenstein S., Marshall M.L., Fry A.J., Kim U., Wernegreen J.J.: The tripartite associations between bacteriophage, Wolbachia, and arthropods. PLoSPathogens2, e43 (2006).
Brownlie J.C., O’Neill S.L.: Wolbachia genomes: insights into an intracellular lifestyle. Review. Curr.Biol.15, R507–R509 (2005).
Curtis C.F., Sinkins S.P.: Wolbachia as a possible means of driving genes into populations. Parasitology116(Suppl.), S111–S115 (1998).
Duron O., Bernard C., Unal S., Berthomieu A., Berticat C., Weill M.: Tracking factors modulating cytoplasmic incompatibilities in the mosquito Culex pipiens. Mol.Ecol.15, 3061–3071 (2006).
Guillemaud T., Pasteur N., Rousset F.: Contrasting levels of variability between cytoplasmic genomes and incompatibility types in the mosquito Culex pipiens. Proc.Biol.Sci.264, 245–251 (1997).
Kambhampati S., Rai K.S.: Mitochondrial DNA variation within and among populations of the mosquito, Aedes albopictus. Genome34, 288–292 (1991).
Kambhampati S., Black W.C., Rai K.S.: Geographic origin of the US and Brazilian Aedes albopictus inferred from allozyme analysis. Heredity67, 85–94 (1991).
Kambhampati S., Rai K.S., Burgun S.J.: Unidirectional cytoplasmic incompatibility in the mosquito, Aedes albopictus. Evolution47, 673–677 (1993).
Kittayapong P., Baisley K.J., Baimai V., O’Neill S.L.: Distribution and diversity of Wolbachia infections in Southeast Asian mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). J.Med.Entomol.37, 340–345 (2000).
Kittayapong P., Mongkalangoon P., Baimai V., O’Neill S.L.: Host age effect and expression of cytoplasmic incompatibility in field populations of Wolbachia-superinfected Aedes albopictus. Heredity88, 270–274 (2002).
Knudsen A.B.: Global distribution and continuing spread of Aedes albopictus. Parasitologia37, 91–97 (1995).
Masui S., Kamoda S., Sasaki T., Ishikawa H.: Distribution and evolution of bacteriophage WO in Wolbachia, the endosymbiont causing sexual alterations in arthropods. J.Mol.Evol.51, 491–497 (2000).
Noda H., Koizumi Y., Zhang Q., Deng K.: Infection density of Wolbachia and incompatibility level in two planthopper species, Laodelphax striatellus and Sogatella furcifera. Insect Biochem.Mol.Biol.31, 727–737 (2001).
O’Neill S.L., Giordane R., Colbert A.E., Karr T.L., Robertsu H.M.: 16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis of the bacterial endosymbionts associated with CI in insects. Proc.Nat.Acad.Sci.USA89, 2699–2702 (1992).
Perrot-minnot M.J., Werren J.H.: Wolbachia infection and incompatibility dynamics in experimental selection lines. J.Evol.Biol.12, 272–282 (1999).
Poinsot D., Bourtzis K., Markakis G., Savakis C., Mercot H.: Wolbachia transfer from Drosophila melanogaster into Drosophila simulans: host effect and cytoplasmic incompatibility relationships. Genetics150, 227–237 (1998).
Ruang-areerate T., Kittayapong P.: Wolbachia transfection in Aedes aegypti: a potential gene driver of dengue vectors. Proc.Nat. Acad.Sci.USA103, 12534–12539 (2006).
Sinkins S.P.: Wolbachia and cytoplasmic incompatibility in mosquitoes. Review. Insect Biochem.Mol.Biol.34, 723–729 (2004).
Sinkins S.P., Gould F.: Gene drive systems for insect disease vectors. Nature Rev.Genet.7, 427–435 (2006).
Stouthamer R., Breeuwer J.A., Hurst G.D.: Wolbachia pipientis: microbial manipulator of arthropod reproduction. Ann.Rev.Microbiol.53, 71–102 (1999).
Veneti Z., Clark M.E., Zabalou S., Karr T.L., Savakis C, Bourtzis K.: Cytoplasmic incompatibility and sperm cyst infection in different Drosophila-Wolbachia associations. Genetics164, 545–552 (2003).
Weeks A.R., Reynolds K.T., Hoffman A.A.: Wolbachia dynamics and host effects: what has (and has not) been demonstrated? Trends Ecol.Evol.17, 257–262 (2002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ahantarig, A., Trinachartvanit, W., Chauvatcharin, N. et al. Wolbachia and bacteriophage WO-B density of Wolbachia a-infected Aedes albopictus mosquito. Folia Microbiol 53, 547–550 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-008-0087-x
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-008-0087-x