Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of regression and adaptive neuro-fuzzy models for predicting the compressed air consumption in air-jet weaving

  • Published:
Fibers and Polymers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the response surface regression and adaptive neuro-fuzzy models for predicting the compressed air consumption in air jet weaving. The prediction models are based on the experimental data of 100 samples comprising weft yarn count, fabric width, loom speed and reed count as input variables and compressed air consumption as output/response variable. The models quantitatively characterize the linear and quadratic relationships as well as interactions between the input and output variables exhibiting very good prediction ability and accuracy, with ANFIS model being slightly better in performance than the regression model. The models could be used for estimating the compressed air consumption, identifying air leakages and production planning in a weaving mill.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Ishida and A. Okajima, Text. Res. J., 64, 10 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Ishida and A. Okajima, Text. Res. J., 64, 88 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Y. Jeong, K. H. Kim, J. H. Choi, and C. K. Lee, Int. J. Kor. Soc. Prec. Eng., 6, 23 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ö. Göktepe and O. Bozkan, Text. Res. J., 78, 816 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Masuda, Y. Sogi, and N. Ogata, J. Text. Mach. Soc. Japan., 52, T9 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Belforte, G. Mattiazzo, F. Testore, and C. Visconte, Text. Res. J., 81, 791 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. H. W. Krause, Mell. Text. (Eng. Ed.), 61, 789 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Wahhoud, Mell. Text. (Eng. Ed.), 64, 257 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  9. U. Kissling, Mell. Text. (Eng. Ed.), 66, 104 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  10. O. Colak and M. Kodaloglu, Fib. & Text. East. Eur., 12, 47 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Githaiga, L. Vangheluwe, and P. Kiekens, J. Text. Inst., 91, 35 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Z. A. Malik, M. H. Malik, T. Hussain, and A. Tanwari, Ind. J. Fib. Text. Res., 35, 310 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Majumdar, P. K. Majumdar, and B. Sarkar, J. Text. Inst., 96, 55 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. N. Ucar and S. Ertugrul, Text. Res. J., 72, 361 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. D. Nurwaha and X. H. Wang, Fiber. Polym., 9, 782 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Ju and H. Ryu, Fiber. Polym., 7, 203 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Majumdar, M. Ciocoiu, and M. Balga, Fiber. Polym., 9, 210 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanveer Hussain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hussain, T., Jabbar, A. & Ahmed, S. Comparison of regression and adaptive neuro-fuzzy models for predicting the compressed air consumption in air-jet weaving. Fibers Polym 15, 390–395 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-014-0390-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-014-0390-x

Keywords

Navigation