Skip to main content
Log in

Convergence Stability for Ricci Flow

  • Published:
The Journal of Geometric Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The principle of convergence stability for geometric flows is the combination of the continuous dependence of the flow on initial conditions, with the stability of fixed points. It implies that if the flow from an initial state \(g_0\) exists for all time and converges to a stable fixed point, then the flows of solutions that start near \(g_0\) also converge to fixed points. We show this in the case of the Ricci flow, carefully proving the continuous dependence on initial conditions. Symmetry assumptions on initial geometries are often made to simplify geometric flow equations. As an application of our results, we extend known convergence results to open sets of these initial data, which contain geometries with no symmetries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In their beautiful recent preprint [6], R. Bamler and B. Kleiner prove a kind of continuous dependence result for the Ricci flow in a very general context of singular flows on compact three-dimensional manifolds, with some additional hypotheses. See for example Theorem 1.5.

References

  1. Agmon, S., Douglis, A., Nirenberg, L.: Estimates near the boundary for solutions of elliptic partial differential equations satisfying general boundary conditions. II. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 17, 35–92 (1964)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Amann, H.: Linear and quasilinear parabolic problems. Vol. I. Abstract linear theory. Monographs in Mathematics, 89. Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Angenent, S., Daskalopoulos, P., Sesum, N.: Unique asymptotics of ancient convex mean curvature flow solutions, arXiv:1503.01178

  4. Bamler, R.: Stability of hyperbolic manifolds with cusps under Ricci flow. Adv. Math. 263, 412–467 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bamler, R.: Stability of symmetric spaces of noncompact type under Ricci flow. Geom. Funct. Anal. 25(2), 342–416 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bamler, R., Kleiner, B.: Uniqueness and stability of Ricci flow through singularities, arXiv:1709.04122

  7. Besse, A.L.: Einstein manifolds. Reprint of the 1987 edition. Classics in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (2008). xii+516 pp

  8. Biquard, O., Mazzeo, R.: A nonlinear Poisson transform for Einstein metrics on product spaces. J. Eur. Math. Soc. 13(5), 1423–1475 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Chow, B., Knopf, D.: The Ricci Flow: An Introduction. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Chow, B., Chu, S-C., Glickenstein, D., Guenther, C., Isenberg, J., Ivey, T., Knopf, D., Lu, P., Luo, F., Ni, L.: The Ricci flow: techniques and applications. Part IV. Long-time solutions and related topics. Math. Surv. Mono., 206. AMS, Providence, RI, pp. xx+374 (2015)

  11. Chow, B., Lu, P., Lei, N.: Hamilton’s Ricci flow. Grad. Stud. Math. 77, 608 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Carfora, M., Isenberg, J., Jackson, M.: Convergence of the Ricci flow for metrics with indefinite Ricci curvature. J. Differ. Geom. 31(1), 249–263 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Clément, P.: One-parameter semigroups. CWI Monographs, North-Holland (1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Dai, X., Wang, X., Wei, G.: On the variational stability of Kaehler–Einstein metrics. Commun. Anal. Geom. 15(4), 669–693 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. DaPrato, G., Lunardi, A.: Stability, instability and center manifold theorem for fully nonlinear autonomous parabolic equations in Banach Space. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 101, 115–141 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Eichhorn, J.: Global Analysis on Open Manifolds. Nova Science, New York (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Gilbarg, D., Trudinger, N. S.: Elliptic partial differential equations of second order. Reprint of the 1998 edition. Classics in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. xiv+517 (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Guenther, C., Isenberg, J., Knopf, D.: Stability of the Ricci flow at Ricci-flat metrics. Commun. Anal. Geom. 10(4), 741–777 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamilton, R.: Three-manifolds with positive Ricci curvature. J. Differ. Geom. 17, 255–306 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Haslhofer, R., Muller, R.: Dynamical stability and instability of Ricci-flat metrics. Math. Ann. 360, 547–553 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Isenberg, J., Jackson, M.: Ricci flow of locally homogeneous geometries on closed manifolds. J. Differ. Geom. 35(3), 723–741 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Jost, J.: Riemannian geometry and geometric analysis. Universitext, Springer, New York (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Knopf, D., Young, A.: Asymptotic stability of the cross curvature flow at a hyperbolic metric. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 137, 699–709 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Koch, H., Lamm, T.: Geometric flows with rough initial data. Asian J. Math. 16(2), 209–235 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Lott, J., Sesum, N.: Ricci flow on three-dimensional manifolds with symmetry. Commun. Math. Helv. 89(1), 1–32 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Li, H., Yin, H.: On stability of the hyperbolic space form under the normalized Ricci flow. Int. Math. Res. Not. 5, 2903–2924 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Lorenzi, L., Lunardi, A., Metafune, G., Pallara, D.: Analytic semigroups and reaction-diffusion problems. Internet seminar, 2004–2005

  28. Lunardi, A.: Analytic semigroups and optimal regularity in parabolic problems. Progress in nonlinear differential equations and their applications 16, Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, (1995)

  29. MathOverFlow question by Igor Belegradek, Does Ricci flow depend continuously on the initial metric, https://mathoverflow.net/questions/58480

  30. Chow, B., Chu, S., Glickenstein, D., Guenther, C., Isenberg, J., Ivey, T., Knopf, D. Lu, P., Luo, F., Ni, L.: The Ricci flow: Techniques and Applications. Part IV: Long Time Solutions and Related Topics. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 206, AMS, Providence, RI (2015)

  31. Sesum, N.: Linear and dynamical stability of Ricci flat metrics. Duke Math. J. 133(1), 1–26 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Schnurer, O., Schultze, F., Simon, M.: Stability of Euclidean space under Ricci flow Comm. Anal. Geom. 16(1), 127–158 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Schnurer, O., Schultze, F., Simon, M.: Stability of hyperbolic space under Ricci flow Comm. Anal. Geom. 19(5), 1023–1047 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu, H.: Stability of complex hyperbolic space under curvature-normalized Ricci flow Geom. Dedicata 164(1), 231–258 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Williams, M., Wu, H.: Dynamical stability of algebraic Ricci solitons. J. Reine Angew. Math. 713, 225–243 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dan Knopf, Jack Lee, Rafe Mazzeo, and Haotian Wu for helpful conversations related to this work. We are grateful to the anonymous referee who made several suggestions that improved this paper. This work was supported by Grants from the Simons Foundation (#426628, E. Bahuaud and #283083, C. Guenther). J. Isenberg was partially supported by the NSF Grant DMS-1263431. This work was initiated at the 2015 BIRS workshop Geometric Flows: Recent Developments and Applications (15w5148).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Guenther.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A. Geometric Background

Appendix A. Geometric Background

For the convenience of the reader, in this appendix we review notation, define appropriate function spaces and review key facts from elliptic PDE theory. Expanded summaries can be found in [7, 22].

Let E be a smooth tangent tensor bundle over a compact Riemannian manifold \((\mathcal {M}^m,g)\). For smooth sections uv, we define the \(L^2\) pairing by

$$\begin{aligned} (u, v) := \int _{\mathcal {M}} \left\langle u, v \right\rangle _g {{\,\mathrm{dvol}\,}}_g, \end{aligned}$$

and we set \(\Vert u \Vert _{L^2}^2 := (u,u)\). Let \(C^{\infty }(E)\) denote the space of smooth sections of E, and define \(L^2(E)\) as the completion of smooth tensor fields with respect to the \(L^2\) norm. In a similar way, for any \(k \in \mathbb {N}_0\) and for any \(p \in [1,\infty )\), we introduce the Sobolev space of tensor fields with k covariant derivatives in \(L^p\) by taking the completion of \(C^{\infty }(E)\) with respect to the norm

$$\begin{aligned} \Vert u \Vert _{L^{k,p}}^p := \sum _{i=0}^k \int _{\mathcal {M}} \Vert \nabla ^{(i)} u \Vert ^p_g {{\,\mathrm{dvol}\,}}_g, \end{aligned}$$

where \(\nabla \) denotes the covariant derivative with respect to the background metric g.

We also need Hölder spaces. Consider any finite covering of \((\mathcal {M},g)\) by open balls \(\mathscr {C} = \{(B_i, \phi _i)\}_{i=1}^N\) with charts \(\phi _i: B_i \subset \mathcal {M}\rightarrow \phi (B_i) \subset \mathbb {R}^m\) and let \(\psi _i\) be an associated smooth partition of unity, so that \(\mathrm {supp}(\psi _i) \subset B_i\) and \(\sum _{i=1}^N \psi _i = 1\). Now if u is a continuous real or complex-valued function on \(\mathcal {M}\), recall that the sup-norm of u is defined by

$$\begin{aligned} \Vert u\Vert _{\infty } := \sup _{q \in \mathcal {M}} |u(q)|. \end{aligned}$$

Note that if u is entirely supported inside one coordinate chart \((B_i, \phi _i) \in \mathscr {C}\), then we may define the Hölder quotient of u by simply computing the Hölder quotient of the coordinate representation of u with respect to a background Euclidean metric, \(\delta \); in other words,

$$\begin{aligned}{}[u]_{\alpha ; B_i} := \sup _{x \ne x', x,x' \in \phi (B_i)} \frac{ \left| u(\phi _i^{-1}(x)) - u(\phi _i^{-1}(x')) \right| }{|x-x'|^{\alpha }}. \end{aligned}$$
(24)

For functions not supported in a single coordinate chart, let us define a Hölder norm with respect to a covering \(\mathscr {C}\) by

$$\begin{aligned} \Vert u\Vert _{C^{0,\alpha }; \mathscr {C}} := \Vert u\Vert _{\infty } + \sum _{i=1}^N {[}\psi _i u]_{\alpha ; B_i}, \end{aligned}$$

and then define the space \(C^{0,\alpha }(\mathcal {M})\) as the set of continuous functions on \(\mathcal {M}\) such that \(\Vert u\Vert _{C^{0,\alpha };\mathscr {C}} < \infty \). While this definition depends on the choice of cover, one may check that membership in \(C^{0,\alpha }\) is independent of this choice and that these norms are all equivalent up to constants depending on the cover. We hereafter omit the symbol \(\mathscr {C}\) from the norm notation.

Regarding Hölder spaces for tensor fields, the key change needed is that in the local definition of the Hölder space for functions (see (24)), we replace \(u(\phi _i^{-1}(x))\) by \((\phi ^{-1}_i)^* u(x)\), and then compute the Hölder quotient of the Euclidean norm of the components of u in coordinates as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} {[}u]_{\alpha ; B_i} := \sup _{x \ne x', x,x' \in \phi _i(B_i)} \frac{ \left| (\phi _i^{-1})^* u (x) - (\phi _i^{-1})^* u(x') \right| _{\delta }}{|x-x'|^{\alpha }}. \end{aligned}$$
(25)

Using this definition for the Hölder norm on a patch \(B_i\), we define the \(C^{k,\alpha }\) norm on the compact manifold \(\mathcal {M}\) (for any \(k \in \mathbb {N}_{0}\) and for any \(\alpha \in (0,1)\)) as follows (suppressing the dependence on \(\mathscr {C}\)):

$$\begin{aligned} \Vert u\Vert _{C^{k,\alpha }} := \sum _{i = 0}^{k} \sup _{\mathcal {M}} \Vert \nabla ^i u\Vert _g + \sum _{i=1}^N [\psi _i \nabla ^k u]_{\alpha ; B_i}. \end{aligned}$$

We denote the space of continuous sections of E for which this norm is finite by \(C^{k,\alpha }(E)\).

Since the space of smooth tensor fields is not closed in the Hölder norms, in order to obtain the cleanest possible statements of our results, we also introduce the space of little Hölder continuous tensor fields. Let \(h^{k,\alpha }(E)\) denote the completion of the set of smooth tensor fields with respect to the \(C^{k,\alpha }\) norm. We note that the space \(h^{k,\alpha }(E)\) is a proper closed subset of \(C^{k,\alpha }(E)\) [28].

We now discuss differential operators, first on functions and then on tensor fields. Consider a linear differential operator P of order k acting on functions, given in local coordinates by

$$\begin{aligned} P u = \sum _{|I|=0}^k a_I(x) \partial ^I u, \end{aligned}$$

where I is a multi-index and \(a_I\) is a sufficiently smooth coefficient function (the precise regularity is expounded below). The principal symbol of P is defined by

$$\begin{aligned} \sigma _{\xi }(P;x) := i^k \sum _{|I| = k} a_I(x) \xi ^{I}, \end{aligned}$$

where \(\xi \) is a real vector. The operator P is defined to be elliptic if \(\sigma _{\xi }(P;x) \ne 0\) for all x and \(\xi \ne 0\). If P is a linear differential operator of order k acting on sections of a tensor bundle E, then in terms of local coordinate-basis tensor components (with indices such as “\(\ell \)” representing collective tensor indices, and with summation over repeated indices presumed) one has

$$\begin{aligned} (P u)_j = \sum _{|I|=0}^k {a^{\ell } _j}_I(x) \partial ^I u_{\ell }, \end{aligned}$$

with the corresponding (now tensorial) symbol

$$\begin{aligned} \sigma _{\xi }(P;x)^{\ell }_j = i^k \sum _{|I| = k} (a_j^\ell )_I(x) \xi ^{I}. \end{aligned}$$

P is elliptic if for all x and \(\xi \ne 0\), \(\sigma _{\xi }(P;x)^\ell _j\) is an isomorphism. P is strongly elliptic if there exists a constant \(C > 0\) such that for all x, \(\xi \) with \(|\xi |=1\), and \(\eta \in \mathbb C\),

$$\begin{aligned} \mathrm {Re} \; \sigma _{\xi }(P;x)_j^{\ell } \eta ^j \overline{\eta }_{\ell } \ge C |\eta |^2. \; \end{aligned}$$

If P has smooth coefficients, we may regard it as a map \(P:C^{\infty }(E) \rightarrow C^{\infty }(E)\). The \(L^2\)-pairing for sections of E may then be used to define the (formal) adjoint \(P^*\) of P. Specifically, \(P^*\) is the differential operator of order k such that

$$\begin{aligned} (Pu,v) = (u, P^* v), \; \; \forall u, v \in C^{\infty }(E). \end{aligned}$$

By definition, P is formally self-adjoint if \(P^* = P\).

We use the following basic results from elliptic theory. These can be found, for example, in Appendix A of [7].

Theorem 8

Let \((\mathcal {M},g)\) be a compact manifold and E a tensor bundle over \(\mathcal {M}\). Let \(P: C^{\infty }(E) \longrightarrow C^{\infty }(E)\) be a linear formally self-adjoint strongly elliptic geometric operator. Then the extension of P to an unbounded operator

$$\begin{aligned} P: L^2(E) \longrightarrow L^2(E) \end{aligned}$$

has a discrete \(L^2\)-spectrum consisting of a sequence of real-valued eigenvalues that diverge to \(-\infty \).

In addition to this extension of the linear differential operator P to \(L^2(E)\), it also extends naturally to an operator mapping \(C^{k+l,\alpha }(E)\) to \(C^{l,\alpha }(E)\), and mapping \(L^{k+l,p}(E)\) to \(L^{l,p}(E)\). For P acting on these Hölder and Sobolev spaces, one has the following elliptic estimates (see Theorem 40 in the Appendix of [7]):

Theorem 9

(Appendix Theorem 27, [7]) For the linear differential operator P described above, there exist positive constants \(c_1\) and \(c_2\) such that

  1. (1)

    for every \(u \in C^{k+l,\alpha }(E)\),

    $$\begin{aligned} \Vert u \Vert _{C^{k+l,\alpha }} \le c_1( \Vert Pu \Vert _{C^{l,\alpha }} + \Vert u \Vert _{C^{0,\alpha }} ); \end{aligned}$$
  2. (2)

    for every \(u \in L^{k+l,p}(E), \; 1< p < \infty \),

    $$\begin{aligned} \Vert u \Vert _{L^{k+l,p}} \le c_2( \Vert Pu \Vert _{L^{l,p}} + \Vert u \Vert _{L^p} ). \end{aligned}$$

Although it is not stated explicitly in the reference above, the constants \(c_1\) and \(c_2\) appearing in the above estimates depend on upper and lower bounds for the coefficients of the operator; see [17].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bahuaud, E., Guenther, C. & Isenberg, J. Convergence Stability for Ricci Flow. J Geom Anal 30, 310–336 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-018-00132-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-018-00132-9

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation