Skip to main content
Log in

TBM construction process simulation and performance optimization

  • Published:
Transactions of Tianjin University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Long tunnel excavation with tunnel boring machine (TBM) is a complex and stochastic process. It is easily affected by uncertainties and needs to be adjusted according to specific geological conditions in different tunnel sections, which makes the construction scheduling and management difficult. Based on the rock mass classification, this paper estimates the penetration rate. Using the rate, a cyclic network simulation (CYCLONE) model of TBM boring system is established, and the advance rates under different geological conditions are determined. Then, the impact of different cutter head thrust, which is chosen in reasonable range according to previous experiences, on project schedule is analyzed. Moreover, the simulation model of mucking system is built to determine the number of muck trains and rail intersections reasonably, regarding the efficiency of muck loading and material transporting. Based on the interaction and interrelation between TBM boring system and mucking system, the combined CYCLONE model for the entire tunneling process is established. Then reasonable construction schedule, the utilization rate of working resources, and the probability of project completion are obtained through the model programming. At last, a project application shows the feasibility of the presented method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shahriar Kourosh. Geotechnical risk assessment based approach for rock TBM selection in difficult ground conditions [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2007, 23(3): 318–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Okubo S. Expert system for applicability of tunnel boring machines in Japan[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2003, 36(4): 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gertscha R, Gertschb L, Rostami J. Disc cutting tests in Colorado Red Granite: Implications for TBM performance prediction[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2007, 44(2): 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barton N. TBM performance in rock based on Q TBM[J]. Tunnels and Tunnelling International, 1999, 31(9): 41–48.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang Leshi, Zhang Guoliang, Wang Yu. TBM back up system research[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2006, 37(3): 16–22 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Li, Zhang Yumin, Hou Zhi. Program of TBM muck trains[J]. Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology, 2000, 31(1): 47–49 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Farmer I W, Glossop N H. Mechanics of disc cutter penetration[ J]. Tunnels and Tunneling International, 1980, 12: 622–625.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bruland A. Hard Rock Tunnel Boring[D]. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rostami J. Development of a Force Estimation Model for Rock Fragmentation with Disc Cutters Through Theoretical Modeling and Physical Measurement of Crushed Zone Pressure[D]. Department of Mining Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, USA, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sapigni M. TBM performance estimation using rock mass classifications[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2002, 39: 771–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nelson P P, Yousof A A, Laughton C. Improved strategies for TBM performance prediction and project management[ C]. In: RETC Proceedings. London, 1999. 963–979.

  12. Benardos A G, Kaliampakos D C. Modelling TBM performance with artificial neural networks[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2004, 19(6): 597–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Innaurato N, Oggeri C, Oreste P P et al. Experimental and numerical studies on rock breaking with TBM tools under high stress confinement[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2007, 40(5): 429–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Johannessen O. NTH Hard Rock Tunnel Boring[Z]. Project Report 1-94, NTH/NTNU Trondheim, Norway, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ioannou P G. Geologic prediction model for tunneling[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 1987, 113(4): 569–590.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Likhitruangslip V, Ioannou P G. Risk-sensitive decision support system for tunnel construction[C] In: ASCE Conference Proceedings on Geotechnical Engineering for Transportation Project. American Society of Civil Engineers, Los Angeles, USA, 2004. 1508–1515.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donghai Liu  (刘东海).

Additional information

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.50709024) and Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (No. NCET-08-0391).

LIU Donghai, born in 1974, male, Dr, associate Prof.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, D., Zhou, Y. & Jiao, K. TBM construction process simulation and performance optimization. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 16, 194–202 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-010-0035-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-010-0035-0

Keywords

Navigation