Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between outdoor and indoor ozone pollution concentration

  • Published:
Transactions of Tianjin University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyses the changing rule of indoor ozone concentration and its influencing factors. A formula of indoor-outdoor concentration ratio (I/O ratio) was deduced based on the indoor ozone mass-balance equation. The ozone I/O ratio in different kinds of buildings was studied. Results show that I/O ratio is much related to air-exchange rate, which is well compatible with the theoretical calculation results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amann A, Bertok I, Cofala J et al. Cost-effective control of acidification and ground-level ozone [J]. In: Third Interim Report to the European Commission. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis(IIASA). Laxenburg, Austria, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sabersky R H, Sinema Da A, Shair F H. Concentrations, decay rates, and removal of ozone and their relation to establishing clean indoor air [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 1973, 7(4): 347–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sutton D J, Nodolf K M, Makino K K. Predicting ozone concentrations in residential structures [J]. ASHRAE Journal, 1976, 18: 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Niu J L, Tung C W, Burnett J. Quantification of dust removal and ozone emission of ionizer air-cleaners by chamber testing[J]. Journal of Electrostatics,2001,51(1):20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu Linmao, Guo Jingfu, Li Jie et al. The effect of wire heating and configuration on ozone emission in a negative ion generator [J]. Journal of Electrostatics, 2000, 48(2): 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Office Equipment: Design, Indoor Air Emissions, and Pollution Prevention Opportunities[R]. US Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, EPA/600/SR-95/045, 1995.

  7. Lee S C, Sanches Lam, Ho Kin Fai. Characterization of VOCs, ozone, and PM10 emissions from office equipment in an environmental chamber [J]. Building and Environment, 2001, 36(7): 837–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nazaroff W W, Cass G R. Mathematical modeling of chemically reactive pollutants in indoor air[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 1986, 20(9): 924–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Weschler C J, Shields H C, Naik D V. Indoor chemistry involving O3, NO, and NO2 as evidenced by 14 months of measurements at a site in California[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 1994, 28(12): 2120–2132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Weschler C J, Shields H C, Naik D V. Indoor ozone exposures[J]. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 1989, 39(12): 1562–1568.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Weschler C J, Shields H C, Naik D V. Ozone-removal efficiencies of activated carbon filters after more than three years of continuous service[J]. ASHRAE Transactions, Symposia, 1994, 100(2): 1121–1129.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junjie Liu  (刘俊杰).

Additional information

DU Xiaogang, born in 1966, male, doctorate student.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Du, X., Liu, J. Relationship between outdoor and indoor ozone pollution concentration. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 15, 330–335 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-009-0058-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-009-0058-6

Keywords

Navigation