Skip to main content
Log in

Attributes influencing college students’ participation in volunteering: a conjoint analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the increasing efforts by both government and higher education institutions to develop programs to provide college students with opportunities for community service, little is known as to which attributes of volunteer activity encourage or discourage participation. This study examines the relative importance of the selected five attributes of a formal volunteering activity in college students’ decision to volunteer. From a survey of 380 college students attending a university in the southeastern United States, this study employs a conjoint analysis with 16 distinctive volunteering scenarios. The findings indicate that an organization’s mission is the most important determinant of their participation, followed by travel distance, reference groups, flexibility, and task types. The results also reveal gender-specific preferences regarding volunteering activities. This study concludes with suggestions for marketing volunteer programs to different segments of college students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although volunteer can take leadership roles (such as board members and project leader), it is not very common for student volunteers.

  2. Putnam (2000) points the increase in time spent in vehicles as one of the culprits of decrease in civic engagement. Similarly, CNCS (2010) reports that states with a shorter average commuting time tend to have high volunteer rates compared to those with longer average commuting time. However, no empirical research has examined the impact of commuting time on probability of volunteering.

References

  • Amichai-Hamburger Y (2008) Potential and promise of online volunteering. Comput Hum Behav 24(2):544–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astin AW, Sax LJ (1998) How undergraduates are affected by service participation. J Coll Stud Dev 39(3):251–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss JA (1994) The effects of community service work on the moral development of college ethics students. J Moral Educ 23(2):183–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brudney JL, Lee Y (2008) Volunteer programs. In: International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol 9, 2nd edn. Macmillan Reference, Detroit

  • Bussell H, Forbes D (2002) Understanding the volunteer market: the what, where, who, and why of volunteering. Int J Pub Nonprofit Mark 7(3):244–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campus Compact (2004) The 2004 Annual Campus Compact Member Survey. http://www.compact.org/survey. Accessed 1 January 2010

  • Cappellari L, Turati G (2004) Volunteer labour supply: the role of workers’ motivations. Ann Publ Cooper Econ 75(4):619–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clary EG, Snyder M (1999) The motivation to volunteer: theoretical and practical considerations. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 8:156–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clary EG, Snyder M, Ridge RD, Copeland J, Stukas AA, Haugen J, Miene P (1998) Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: a functional approach. J Personal Soc Psychol 74:1516–1530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cnaan RA, Handy F, Wadsworth M (1996) Defining who is a volunteer: conceptual and empirical considerations. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 25(3):364–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corporation for National and Community Service (2006) Volunteering in America 2006. http://www.nationalservice.gov. Accessed 15 January 2010

  • Corporation for National and Community Service (2010) Volunteering in America 2010 issue brief. http://www.volunteeringinamerica.gov. Accessed 15 January 2010

  • Craig-Lees M, Harris J, Lau W (2008) The role of dispositional, organizational and situational variables in volunteering. J Nonprofit Pub Sect Mark 19(2):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frayer A (2007) Yoga for the volunteer manager: the practicalities of remaining flexible. Aust J Volunt 12(2):89–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Granzin KL, Olsen JE (1991) Characterizing participants in activities protecting the environments: a focus on donating, recycling, and conservation behaviors. J Pub Policy Mark 10(2):1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Green PE, Krieger AM (1991) Segmenting markets with conjoint analysis. J Mark 55(4):20–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green PE, Srinivasan V (1978) Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook. J Consum Res 5:103–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair J, Anderson R, Tatham R, Black W (2009) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy F, Cnaan RA, Brudney JL, Ascoli U, Meijs LCMP, Ranade S (2000) Public perception of “who is a volunteer”: an examination of the net-cost approach from a cross-cultural perspective. Voluntas 11(1):45–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houle BJ, Sagarin BJ, Kaplan MF (2005) A functional approach to volunteerism: do volunteer motives predict task preference? Basic Appl Soc Psychol 27(4):337–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson C, Parcel M, Cobb M, Uy D (2004) Infrastructure of volunteer agencies: capacity to absorb boomer volunteers. In: Reinventing aging: baby boomers and civic engagement. Harvard School of Public Health, Center for Health Communication, Boston

  • Metz E, NcLellan J, Youniss J (2003) Type of volunteer service and adolescent’s civic development. J Adolesc Res 18(2):188–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orme BK (2006) Getting started with conjoint analysis: strategies for product design and pricing research. Research Publishers, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Points of Light Foundation (2000) A matter of survival: volunteering by, in, and with low income communities. Points of Light Foundation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam RD (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon L, Anheier H, List R, Toepler S, Sokolowsky W et al (1999) Global civil society: dimensions of the nonprofit sector. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Sector I (2001) Giving and volunteering in the United States: key findings. Independent Sector, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundeen RA, Raskoff SA, Garcia MC (2007) Differences in perceived barriers to volunteering to formal organizations: lack of time versus lack of interest. Nonprof Manag Leader 17(3):279–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trudeau KJ, Devlin AS (1996) College students and community service: who, with whom, and why? J Appl Soc Psychol 26(21):1867–1888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Labor (2010a) Volunteering in the United States, 2009. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/volun.nr0.htm. Accessed 15 January 2010

  • United States Department of Labor (2010b) College Enrollment and Work Activity of 2009 High School Graduates. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/hsgec.nr0.htm. Accessed 15 January 2010

  • Wallace N (2001) A virtual army of volunteers. Chron Philanthr 13(9):37–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson J (2000) Volunteering. Annu Rev Sociol 26:215–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson J, Musick M (1997) Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. Am Sociol Rev 62(5):692–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson J, Musick M (1999) The effects of volunteering on volunteers. Law Contemp Probl 62(4):141–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Won D, Park M, Turner BA (2010) Motivation for participation in health related charity sport events. J Venue Event Manag 1(2):17–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright ND, Larson V, Higgs R (1995) Marketing of voluntarism: the case of Appalachian mountain housing. J Consum Satisf Dissatisf Complain Behav 8:188–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Wymer WW (2003) Differentiating literacy volunteers: a segmentation analysis for target marketing. Int J Nonprofit Volunt Sect Mark 8(3):267–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doyeon Won.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, Yj., Won, D. Attributes influencing college students’ participation in volunteering: a conjoint analysis. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark 8, 149–162 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-011-0074-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-011-0074-9

Keywords

Navigation