Skip to main content
Log in

Gender differences in social support in the decision to volunteer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a study that examines gender differences relating to social influences and norms when individuals are making the decision to volunteer. Specifically, this paper examines gender differences in reciprocity and collaboration in initiating volunteer service. An online questionnaire was used to collect data (N = 742). The results were significant and supported the hypotheses. Females are more likely than males to expect reciprocation in volunteer recruitment by individuals within their social networks. Females are more likely than males to seek social support when initiating volunteer service. Managerial implications and suggested areas of future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Khalek A (2006) Measuring happiness with a single-item scale. Soc Behav Pers Int J 34(2):139–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen N, Meyer J (1990) The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. J Occup Psychol 63(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonucci T, Akiyama H (1987) An examination of sex differences in social support among older men and women. Sex Roles 17(11):737–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonucci T, Fuhrer R, Jackson J (1990) Social support and reciprocity: a cross-ethnic and cross-national perspective. J Soc Pers Relat 7(4):519–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen S (2004) The essential difference: male and female brains and the truth about autism. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Basil D, Ridgway N, Basil M (2006) Guilt appeals: the mediating effect of responsibility. Psychol Mark 23(12):1035–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergkvist L, Rossiter J (2007) The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. J Mark Res 44(2):175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunsberger K, Wybenga H, Gates R (2007) A comparison of reliability between telephone and web-based surveys. J Bus Res 60(7):758–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne K (2002) Biology at work: rethinking sexual equality. Rutgers Univ Pr.

  • Clary E, Snyder M, Stukas A (1996) Volunteers’ motivations: findings from a national survey. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Quart 25(4):485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly A (1987) Sex differences in social behavior: a social-role interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum

  • Eagly A (2009) The his and hers of prosocial behavior: an examination of the social psychology of gender. Am Psychol 64(8):644–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Febbraro A (1997) Gender differences in giving and volunteering. From http://www.givingandvolunteering.ca/factsheets/1997_CA_gender_differences.asp

  • Flaherty J, Richman J (1989) Gender differences in the perception and utilization of social support: theoretical perspectives and an empirical test. Soc Sci Med 28(12):1221–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty JA, Gaviria FM, Pathak D (1983) The measurement of social support: the Social Support Network Inventory. Compr Psychiatr 24(6):521–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gainer B, Padanyi P (2002) Applying the marketing concept to cultural organisations: an empirical study of the relationship between market orientation and performance. Int J Nonprofit Volunt Sect Mark 7(2):182–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner D, Cummings L, Dunham R, Pierce J (1998) Single-item versus multiple-item measurement scales: an empirical comparison. Educ Psychol Meas 58(6):898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geary DC (2010) Male, female: the evolution of human sex differences, 2nd edn. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Golombok S, Fivush R (1994) Gender development. Cambridge Univ Pr

  • Gorsuch R, McFarland S (1972) Single vs. multiple-item scales for measuring religious values. J Sci Stud Relig 11(1):53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch R, McPherson S (1989) Intrinsic/extrinsic measurement: I/E-revised and single-item scales. J Sci Stud Relig 28(3):348–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haski-Leventhal D (2009) Elderly volunteering and well-being: a cross-European comparison based on SHARE data. Voluntas: Int J Volunt Nonprofit Organ 20(4):388–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haski-Leventhal D, Bargal D (2008) The volunteer stages and transitions model: organizational socialization of volunteers. Hum Relat 61(1):67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House JS, (1981) Work stress and social support. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co

  • Hürny C, Bernhard J, Coates A, Peterson H, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Gelber R, Goldhirsch A (1996) Responsiveness of a single-item indicator versus a multi-item scale: assessment of emotional well-being in an international adjuvant breast cancer trial. Med Care 34(3):234–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim N, Brannen D (1997) Implications of gender differences on the motivation to volunteer in hospitals. J Soc Serv Res 22(4):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Independent Sector (2001) Giving & volunteering in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Independent Sector (also available at http://www.cpanda.org/pdfs/gv/GV01Report.pdf)

  • Ingersoll-Dayton B, Antonucci T (1988) Reciprocal and nonreciprocal social support: contrasting sides of intimate relationships. J Gerontol 43(3):S65

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan J, Turner B (2008) The feasibility of single-item measures for organizational justice. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci 12:237–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause N, Keith V (1989) Gender differences in social support among older adults. Sex Roles 21(9):609–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby E (1999) The two sexes: growing up apart, coming together. Harvard University Press

  • Nagy M (2002) Using a single-item approach to measure facet job satisfaction. J Occup Organ Psychol 75(1):77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Octon C (1993) A re-examination of marketing for British non-profit organisations. Eur J Mark 17(5):33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads S (2004) Taking sex differences seriously. Encounter Books

  • Robins R, Hendin H, Trzesniewski K (2001) Measuring global self-esteem: construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 27(2):151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell J, Weiss A, Mendelsohn G (1989) Affect grid: a single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. J Personal Soc Psychol 57(3):493–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant A (2005) Marketing management for nonprofit organizations, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Starnes B, Wymer W (2001) Conceptual foundations and practical guidelines for retaining volunteers who serve in local nonprofit organizations: part II. J Nonprofit Public Sect Mark 9(1):97–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streeter CL, Franklin C (1992) Defining and measuring social support: guidelines for social work practitioners. Res Soc Work Pract 2(1):81–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tardy CH (1985) Social support measurement. Am J Community Psychol 13(2):187–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udry J (1994) The nature of gender. Demography 31(4):561–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanous J, Reichers A, Hudy M (1997) Overall job satisfaction: how good are single-item measures? J Appl Psychol 82(2):247–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson J (2000) Volunteering. Annu Rev Sociol 26:215–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wymer W (1997) Segmenting volunteers using values, self-esteem, empathy, and facilitation as determinant variables. J Nonprofit Public Sect Mark 5(2):3–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wymer W, Samu S (2002) Volunteer service as symbolic consumption: gender and occupational differences in volunteering. J Mark Manag 18(9):971–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wymer W, Samu S (2008) The influence of cause marketing associations on product and cause brand value. Int J Nonprofit Volunt Sect Mark 14(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wymer W, Riecken G, Yavas U (1997) Determinants of volunteerism. J Nonprofit Public Sect Mark 4(4):3–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yavas U, Riecken G (1985) Can volunteers be targeted? J Acad Mark Sci 13(1):218–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter Wymer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wymer, W. Gender differences in social support in the decision to volunteer. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark 9, 19–26 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-011-0072-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-011-0072-y

Keywords

Navigation