Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Uses and Misuses of the DSM in Forensic Settings

  • Published:
Psychological Injury and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present in broad summary our views—gained through experiences interacting in the legal system—concerning some of the more significant issues that trouble the legal/psychiatric interface. Even when a psychiatric diagnosis is the reliable and accurate result of appropriate evaluation methods and proper documentation, it may not be helpful in answering the questions posed to mental health professionals by the legal system. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual provides explicit cautions that its clinical descriptions of mental disorder do not always map well with legal concepts of mental illness or abnormality. This is an inherent tension that accurate psychiatric diagnosis can reduce, but not eliminate. The relationship between psychiatry and the law continues to evolve and we hope will improve with greater understanding of the possible misunderstandings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1999). Dangerous sex offenders: A task force report of the American Psychiatric Association. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-V (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

  • Bricklin, B. (2013). The custody evaluation handbook: Research based solutions & applications (e-book). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S. Ct. 2786 (1993).

  • Doren, D. M. (2002). Evaluating sex offenders: A manual for civil commitment and beyond. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faigman, D. (2010). Evidentiary incommensurability: A preliminary exploration of the problem of reasoning from general scientific data to individualized legal decision making. Brooklyn Law Review, 75, 1115–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  • First, M., & Pincus, H. (2002). The DSM-IV text revision: Rationale and potential impact on clinical practice. Psychiatric Service, 53, 288–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frances, A., Widiger, T., & Pincus, H. (1989). The development of DSM-IV. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 373–375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013, 34 ALR 145 (D.C. Cir. 1923).

  • Halon, R. L. (2009). Clinical versus forensic psychology: The twain never meets. Critical book review of Mental Disorder and Criminal Law: Responsibility, Punishment and Competence by R. Schopp, R. L. Wiener, B. H. Bornstein, & S. L. Willborn (Eds.). PsycCRITIQUES, 54(37).

  • Hogoboom, W., & King, D. (1998). California practice guide: Family law. Eagan: Thomson Reuters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kansas v. Hendricks, U.S. 521 US 346 (1997).

  • Kendell, R. E. (1975). The role of diagnosis in psychiatry. Philadelphia: Blackwell Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (2007). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regier, D. A., Narrow, W. E., Clarke, D. E., Kraemer, H. C., Kuramoto, S. J., Kuhl, E. A., & Kupfer, D. J. (2013). DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, part II: Test–retest reliability of selected categorical diagnoses. American Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 59–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sartorious, N., Üstün, T. B., Costa e Silva, J.-A., Goldberg, D., Lecrubier, Y., Ormel, J., ... Witchen, H. U. (1993). An international study of psychological problems in primary care: Preliminary report from the World Health Organization collaborative project on ‘psychological problems in general health care’. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 819–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

    Allen Frances

  2. San Luis Obispo, CA, USA

    Robert Halon

Authors
  1. Allen Frances
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert Halon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Halon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frances, A., Halon, R. The Uses and Misuses of the DSM in Forensic Settings. Psychol. Inj. and Law 6, 336–344 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-013-9180-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-013-9180-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation