Skip to main content
Log in

Three-phase modeling of viscoelastic nanofiber-reinforced matrix

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper three-phase fiber-reinforced matrix is analyzed using analytical micromechanical model named simplified unit cell method (SUCM). The system consists of transversely isotropic elastic nanotube and viscoelastic matrix and interphase region. This interphase region comprises considerable volume fraction of the system because of large surface area per unit volume of the nanotubes. However, volume fraction of the interphase in particular short fiber system is considerably small to contribute to the whole properties of it. The presented closed-form solutions are able to predict the effective response of the three-phase fiber-reinforced matrix in any combination of normal and shear loading conditions. To verify the results, creep compliance of Graphite/Epoxy in 10° and 45° and 90° off-axis conditions are compared with existing data. Nanotube/Polycarbonate is also examined to investigate the effect of interphase on viscoelastic behaviors of nanocomposites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Referances

  1. T. Ramanathan, H. Liu, H. Shen and L. C. Brinson, Functionalized SWNT polymer nanocomposites for dramatic property improvement, Journal of Polymer Science, Part B: Polym. Phys., 43(17) (2005) 2269–2279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. C. Y. Wei, D. Shrivastava and K. Choi, Thermal expansion and diffusion coefficients of carbon nanotube, polymer composites, Nano Lett., 2(6) (2002) 647–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zh. Xi and B. D. Youn, Predictive carbon nanotube models using the eigenvector dimension reduction (EDR) method, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 26(4) (2012) 1089–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhimin Xi and Byeng D. Youn, Predictive carbon nanotube models using the eigenvector dimension reduction (EDR) method, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 26(4) (2012) 1089–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Ghorbanpour Arani, M. Rahnama Mobarakeh, Sh. Shams and M. Mohammadimehr, The effect of CNT volume fraction on the magneto-thermo-electro-mechanical behavior of smart nanocomposite cylinder, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 26(8) (2012) 2565–2572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. N. Kordani and A. Sadough, Optimization of ethanol content in shear thickening fluid under impact loading, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, (2013) Accepted.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. T. Thostenson and T. W. Chou, On the elastic properties of carbon nanotube-based composites: Modeling and characterization, Journal of PHYSICS D: Applied PHYSICS, 36 (2003) 573–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. I. C. Finegan, G. G. Tibbetts and R. F. Gibson, Modeling and characterization of damping in carbon nanofiber/polypropylene composites, Composites Science and Technology, 63 (2003) 1629–1635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Liu and L. C. Brinson, A hybrid numerical-analytical method for modeling the viscoelastic properties of polymer nanocomposites, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 73 (2006) 758–767.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. F. T. Fisher and L. C. Brinson, Viscoelastic interphase in polymer-matrix composites: Theoretical models and finiteelement analysis, Composite Science and Technology, 61 (2001) 731–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. PS. Theocaris, The unfolding model for the representation of the mesophase layer in composites, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 30 (1985) 621–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. K. Mai, E. Mader and M. Muhle, Interphase Characterization in composites with new non-destructive method, Composites Part A, 29A (1998) 1111–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. H. HE, H. Y. Kong, R. R. Yang, H. Dou, N. Faraz, L. Wang and C. Feng, Review on fiber morphology obtained by bubble electrospinning and blown bubble spinning, Thermal Science, 16(5) (2012) 1263–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Pankonian, Z. Ounaies and C. Yang, Electrospinning of cellulose and SWNT-cellulose nano fibers for smart applications, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 25(10) (2011) 2631–2639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. G. M. Odegard, Modeling and testing of the viscoelastic properties of a graphite nanoplatelet/epoxy composite, Journal of Intelligent Materials and Structures (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. R. Falahatgar, M. Salehi and M. M. Aghdam, Nonlinear viscoelastic response of unidirectional fiber-reinforced composites in off-axis loading, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 28(15) (2009) 1793–1811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M. M. Aghdam, M. J. Pavier and D. J. Smith, Micromechanical modeling of metal matrix composite subjected combined thermal and shear loading, Proceeding of CADCOMP-98, Montreal (1998) 321–330.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Aboudi, A continuum theory for fiber-reinforced elasticvisco-plastic composites, International Journal of Engineering Science, 20 (1982) 605–620.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Masoumi, M. Salehi and M. Akhlaghi, Multiscale Analysis of Viscoelastic Laminated Composite Plates Using Generalized Differential Quadrature, Springer-Verlag (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. R. Falahatgar, M. Salehi and M. M. Aghdam, Micromacro analysis of viscoelastic unidirectional laminated composite plates using DR method, Applied Composite Material, 17 (2010) 427–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. L. C. Brinson and W. S. Lin, Comparison of micromechanical methods for effective properties of multiphase viscoelastic composites, Composite Structures, 41 (1998) 353–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. R. N. Yancey and M. J. Pindera, Micromechanical analysis of the creep response of unidirectional composites, ASME Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 112 (1990) 157–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. R. Qiao and L. C. Brinson, Simulation of interphase percolation and gradients in polymer nanocomposites, Composite Science and Technology, 69 (2009) 491–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naser Kordani.

Additional information

Recommended by Associate Editor HYUNG YIL LEE

Manouchehr Salehi completed his B.Sc. (Hons) in Production Engineering in 1984 and M.Phil. in Mechanical Engineering in 1987 at Leeds Metropolitan University and then moved to Lancaster University where he undertook a comprehensive research program on numerical and experimental analysis of stiffened and unstiffened sector plates towards his Ph.D. degree which he completed in 1990. He then returned to his homeland Iran to take up the position of Assistant Professor in Solid Mechanics at the Mechanical Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran Iran in 1990. Dr. Salehi is now Associate Professor in Solid Mechanics at the same University. Dr. Salehi has presented more than sixty papers at International and National conferences and has travelled to twelve countries to present these papers. He has more than forty referred journal publications and two books one on’ Optimization of Composite Structures using Genetic Algorithm’ and the other one on’ Engineering Elasticity’.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fatemifar, F., Salehi, M., Adibipoor, R. et al. Three-phase modeling of viscoelastic nanofiber-reinforced matrix. J Mech Sci Technol 28, 1039–1044 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-013-1177-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-013-1177-5

Keywords

Navigation