Skip to main content
Log in

Modular design method based on simultaneous consideration of physical and functional relationships in the conceptual design stage

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are many benefits of a modular product including reduced cost, rapid product development and reduced production time. The modular design of products has been increasingly popularized in modern engineering design activity. A new design method is proposed to design a modular product based on relationships among functional requirements of the product to overcome the difficulty of modular design. Axiomatic design, the function-based design method and design structure matrix are efficiently combined in the proposed method. Functional requirements and design parameters are defined based on the independence Axiom of axiomatic design and the zigzagging process of axiomatic design is employed for the decomposition of functional requirements and design parameters. The function-based design method is utilized for the decomposition of functional requirements and the design structure matrix is used to modularize the design parameters of the bottom level of the zigzagging process. Three design examples are demonstrated to validate the proposed method. The results are discussed and the usefulness of the proposed method is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. V. Martin and K. Ishii, Design for variety: Developing standardized and modularized product platform architectures, research in engineering design, 13(4) (2002) 213–235.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. J. Pine, Mass customization: the new frontier in business competition, Boston: Harvard Business School Press (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Bremmer, Cutting edge platforms, Financial Times Automotive World (1999) June: 30–41.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. K. Palani Rajan, M. Van Wie, M. I. Campbell, K. L. Wood and K. N. Otto, An empirical foundation for product flexibility, Design Studies, 26 (2005) 405–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Muffato Introducing a platform strategy in product development, International Journal of Production Economics, 60–61 (1999) 145–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. P. O’Grady and W. Y. Liang, An object oriented approach to design with modules, Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 11(4) (1998) 267–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Viswanathan and V. Allada Configuration analysis to support product redesign for end-of-life disassembly, International Journal of Production Research, 39(8) (2001) 1733–1753.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. J. K. Gershenson, G. J. Parasad, and Y. Zhang, Product modularity: Measure and design methods, Journal of Engineering Design, 15(1) (2004) 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. T. L. Yu, A. A. Yassine and D. E. Goldberg, An information theoretic method for developing modular architectures using genetic algorithms, Research in Engineering Design, 18 (2007) 91–109.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. G. Pahl and W. Beitz, Engineering design: A systematic approach, 2nd ed. London: Springer (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. B. Stone and K. L. Wood, Development of a functional basis for design, Journal of Mechanical Design, 122(4) (2000) 359–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. C. R. Bryant, K. L. Sivaramakrishnan, M. Van Wie, R. B. Stone and D. A. McAdams, A modular design approach to support sustainable design, In: ASME 2004 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, (IDETC/CIE2004), 28 September–2 October Salt Lake City, Utah, USA (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. V. Steward, Planning and managing the design of systems, In: Technology Management: the New International Language in IEEE International Engineering Management Conference/IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, 27–31 October Portland, USA. (1991) 189–193.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. E. Sosa, S. D. Eppinger and C. M. Rowles, Understanding the effects of product architecture on technical communication in product development organizations, Working Paper Number 4130, Cambridge, MA: Sloan School of Management (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. E. Sosa, S. D. Eppinger and C. M. Rowles, Identifying modular and integrative systems and their impact on design team interaction, Journal of Mechanical Design, 125(2) (2003) 240–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R. B. Stone, K. L. Wood and R. Crawford, A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architectures, Design Studies, 21(1) (2000) 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Chakrabarti and T. P. Bligh, A scheme for functional reasoning in conceptual design, Design Studies, 22(6) (2001) 493–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. N. P. Suh, Axiomatic design: Advances and applications, New York: Oxford University Press (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  19. N. P. Suh, Axiomatic design of mechanical systems, Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 117 (2005) 2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. N. P. Suh, Complexity: Theory and applications, New York: Oxford University Press (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  21. T. Lee, Complexity theory in axiomatic design, Doctoral Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  22. G. J. Park, Analytical methods in design practice, Germany: Springer-Verlag (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  23. V. Hubka, Principles of engineering design, England: Butterworth & Co. (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  24. N. Cross, Engineering design methods: Strategies for product design, New York: John Wiley & Sons (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. G. Ullman, The mechanical design process, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  26. K. T. Ulrich and S. D. Eppinger, Product design and development, 4th ed. Singapore: McGraw-Hill, (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  27. E. P. Hong and G. J. Park, Design information management of an on-line electric vehicle using axiomatic design, SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing, 3(1) (2010) 133–141.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. J. Rissanen, Universal prior for integers and estimation by minimum description length, The Annals of Statistics, 11(2) (1983) 416–431.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gyung-Jin Park.

Additional information

Recommended by Associate Editor Jongsoo Lee

Gyung-Jin Park received the B.S. degree from Hanyang University, Korea in 1980, M.S. degree from KAIST, Korea, in 1982, and the Ph.D. degree from the University of Iowa, USA, in 1986. In 1986–1988, he worked as an assistant professor at Purdue University at Indianapolis, USA. His research focuses on Structural Optimization, machine design, design theory and MDO. His work has yielded over 4 books and 360 technical papers. He is currently a professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Hanyang University, Ansan City, Korea.

Eul-Pyo Hong is a chief research engineer at LG Electronics, Inc. He received his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Hanyang University, Korea. His research interests include design theories and design optimization.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hong, EP., Park, GJ. Modular design method based on simultaneous consideration of physical and functional relationships in the conceptual design stage. J Mech Sci Technol 28, 223–235 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-013-0956-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-013-0956-3

Keywords

Navigation