Skip to main content
Log in

Correction of flow metering coefficients by using multi-dimensional non-linear curve fitting

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flow disturbances can significantly affect flow metering because the downstream flow of flow disturbances can become unstable and asymmetric, thus resulting in measurement errors in the flow meter. A clamp-on type ultrasonic flow meter is an example of a flow meter that is susceptible to flow disturbances given its diametrical configuration of ultrasonic paths. Several flow rate correction formulas have been suggested to mitigate the effect of flow disturbance for improved flow metering. As a novel method, a multi-dimensional non-linear correction formula is suggested to overcome limitations in flow metering that are attributed to the non-linearity of flow disturbances. The non-linear correction formula comprises n-th order polynomials with multiple variables. To validate the usefulness of the non-linear correction formula, the standard error of estimate (SEE) is introduced. Four types of flow configurations, namely, downstream of a contraction pipe, an expansion pipe, a single elbow joint, and a tee joint, are used to show the effect of the non-linear correction formula. The expanded uncertainty based on the SEE indicates estimated values of 1.29%, 11.14%, 1.07%, and 6.31% for the four upstream flow configurations, respectively. Thus, the effect of the non-linear correction formula is limited according to the upstream flow conditions. In the downstream flow of the contraction pipe and of the single elbow joint, the non-linear correction formula not only harmonizes the distribution of the flow rate deviations but also removes the biases of flow rate deviations with respect to the flow velocity, the installation location, and the diameter ratio.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Organization for Standardization, Measurement of fluid flow in closed conduits — Ultrasonic meters for gas — Part 1: Meters for custody transfer and allocation measurement, ISO 17089-1:2010 (2010) Geneva, Swiss.

  2. K. Tezuka, M. Mori, T. Suzuki and T. Kanamine, Ultrasonic pulse-Doppler flow meter application for hydraulic power plants, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 19 (2008) 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. K. Tezuka, M. Mori, T. Suzuki and Y. Takeda), Calibration tests of pulse-Doppler flow meter at national standard loops, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 19 (2008) 181–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Z. Wang, G. Y. Tian and G. P. Lucas, Relationship between velocity profile and distribution of induced potential for an electromagnetic flow meter, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 18 (2007) 99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Ozalp, A. Pinarbasi, M. S. Fakilar and B. Sahin, PIV measurements of flow through a sudden contraction, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 18 (2007) 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. F. Giannetti, P. Luchini and L. Marino, Stability and sensitivity analysis of non-Newtonian flow through an axisymmetric expansion, Journal of Physics: Conference Series (ETC13), 318 (2011) 032015 (10 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. K.-H. Kang, B. -J. Yun, D. -J. Euh and W. -P. Baek, Application of averaging bidirectional flow tube for measurement of single-phase flow rate in a piping system, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 23(3) (2009) 758–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Chun, B. -R. Yoon and K. -B. Lee, Diagnostic flow metering using ultrasound tomography, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 25(6) (2011) 1475–1482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. International Organization for Standardization, Measurement of fluid flow by means of pressure differential devices inserted in circular cross-section conduits running full — Part 2: Orifice plates, ISO 5167-2:2003, (2003) Geneva, Swiss.

  10. Siemens, 2006, System and Method for Flow Profile Calibration Correction for Ultrasonic Flowmeters, WIPO, no.060650.

  11. S. Chun, B. R. Yoon, D. K. Lee and H. M. Choi, Correction of flow metering coefficients using two-dimensional curve fitting, ASME-JSME-KSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conference, July 24–29 (2011), Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.

  12. R. E. Walpole, R. H. Myers, S. L. Myers and K. Ye, Probability and statistics for engineers and scientists, Pearson, New York, USA (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  13. K.-B. Lee, S. Chun, Y. Terao, N. H. Thai, C. T. Yang, M. Tao and M. B. Gutkin, Final report of the APMP water flow key comparison: APMP.M.FF-K1, Metrologia, 48 (2011) 07003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. K. W. Lim and M. K. Chung, Numerical investigation on the installation effects of electromagnetic flowmeter downstream of a 90° elbow — laminar flow case, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 10 (1999) 167–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. G. Wendt, B. Mickan, R. Kramer and D. Dopheide, Systematic investigation of pipe flows and installation effects using laser Doppler anemometry — Part I. Profile measurements downstream of several pipe configurations and flow conditioners, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 7 (1996) 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. J. More, The levenberg-marquardt algorithm: implementation and theory, Numerical Analysis, ed. G. A. Watson, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer Verlag, 630 (1977) 105–116.

  17. W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling and B. P. Flannery, Numerical recipes, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA (2007).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. The MathWorks, Optimization Toolbox™ 5: User’s Guide, March, Natick, MA, U.S.A., Ch.6 (2010) 146–161.

  19. International Organization for Standardization, Uncertainty of measurement — Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995), ISO/IEC Guide 98- 3:2008, (2008) Geneva, Swiss.

  20. M.-G. Kang and G. -M. Lee, Multicriteria evaluation of water resources sustainability in the context of watershed management, Journal of the American Water Resources Associaton (JAWRA), 47 (2011) 813–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. K.-J. Bathe and J. Dong, Studies of finite element procedures — the use of ADINA-F in fluid flow analyses, Computers & Structures, 32 (1989) 499–516.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. C.-S. Kim and C. -H. Sohn, Dynamic characteristics of an unsteady flow through a vortex tube, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 20(12) (2006) 2209–2217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hae-Man Choi.

Additional information

Recommended by Associate Editor Byeong Rog Shin

Sejong Chun is a research engineer working at KRISS, Korea. He joined the Division of Physical Metrology in 2004. He majored in fluid mechanics for his Ph.D study under Professor Hyung Jin Sung at KAIST, Korea. After graduation, he visited Professor Cam Tropea’s laboratory at TU Darmstadt in Germany for one year. His research interests are liquid flow rate metrology, ultrasound flow tomography, and fluid acceleration by using laser-Doppler-anemometry.

Byung-Ro Yoon is a principal research technician working at KRISS, Korea. He has been working in the field of liquid flow rate and liquid viscosity metrology for over 20 years. He is an expert in the calibration and testing of various flow meters and viscometers such as clamp-on type ultrasonic flow meters and Cannon-Fenske type capillary viscometers, among others.

Duck-Ki Lee is currently working as the CEO of Dae Deok Hi-Tech Co. Ltd. in Korea. He formerly worked at KRISS in Korea as a researcher for over 10 years. He has extensive experience in water flow measurements with various types of flow meters including electromagnetic, turbine, and ultrasonic flow meters. His research interests include installation conditions to achieve accurate flow metering in a water flow calibration facility influenced by a valve or an elbow.

Hae-Man Choi is the head of the Center for Fluid Flow and Acoustics in KRISS, Korea. He joined the Division of Physical Metrology in 1985. He majored in fluid mechanics at University of Tsukuba, Japan. His primary focus for his Ph.D degree was the flow visualization of multi-phase flows by using PIV and its application to flow rate metrology. His current work is on the low-pressure gas flow measurement and liquid viscosity fields. He is also concerned with liquid flow measurements with the use of flow meters.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chun, S., Yoon, BR., Lee, DK. et al. Correction of flow metering coefficients by using multi-dimensional non-linear curve fitting. J Mech Sci Technol 26, 3479–3489 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-012-0863-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-012-0863-z

Keywords

Navigation