Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of Maximum Penetration Depth of Suction Caissons in Sand

  • Geotechnical Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

The suction caisson is a large top-closed cylindrical steel structure in diameter, short in length and much thinner in skirt wall thickness. The total resistance of the suction caisson during installation consists of the tip resistance and the skirt wall friction. However, since the thickness of the skirt wall is very small, the skirt wall friction may produce additional vertical stress and shear stress in soil at the skirt tip level, and this additional vertical stress and shear stress will contribute to the increase in the skirt tip resistance. At the same time, seepage induced by suction also causes the tip resistance to reduce significantly. A modified slip-line field is proposed in this study estimating the tip resistance in terms of the slip-line theory. The expression obtaining the minimum suction to install the suction caisson is also proposed in terms of the force equilibrium. In addition, the critical suction is determined based on the mechanism of sand piping. Thus, the maximum penetration depth of the suction caisson can be reached when the critical suction equals the minimum suction. Results from calculations of the minimum suction and the maximum penetration depth have been proved to be in a good agreement with the measured data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Petroleum Institute (API) (1993). Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms, API RP 2A, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, D.C.

  • Andersen, K. H., Murff, J. D., Randolph, M. F., Clukey, E. C., Erbrich, C. T., Jostad, H. P., Hansen, M., and Supachawarote, C. (2005). “Suction anchors for deep water applications. Keynote lecture.” In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics, Perth, Western Australia, pp. 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, K. H., Jostad, H. P., and Dyvik, R. (2008). “Penetration resistance of offshore skirted foundations and anchor in dense sand,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 134, No. 1, pp. 106–116, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:1(106).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bye, A., Erbrich, C., Rognlien, B., and Tjelta, T. I. (1995). “Geotechnical design of bucket foundations.” In: Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference. Paper No. OTC 7793. 27th Ed., pp. 869–883, DOI: 10.4043/7793-MS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, C. J. F. (1998). “Fundamentering av plattformer; Observasjonerog refleksjoner.” 16th Laurits Bjerrum Memorial Lecture, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erbrich, C. T. and Tjelta, T. I. (1999). “Installation of bucket foundations and suction caissons in sand-geotechnical performance.” Proceedings of the 31th Annual Offshore Technology Conference, Houston: OTC 10990, pp. 725–735. DOI: 10.4043/10990-MS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogervorst, J. R. (1980). “Field trials with large diameter suction piles.” Proc., Offshore Technology Conf., OTC 3817, 12th Ed., pp. 217–224, DOI: 10.4043/3817-MS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlsby, G. T. and Byrne, B. W. (2005). “Design procedure for installation of suction caissons in sand,” Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 158, No. 3, pp.135–144, DOI: 10.1680/geng.2005.158.3.135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harireche, O., Mehravar, M., and Alani, A. M. (2013). “Suction caisson installation in sand with isotropic permeability varying with depth,” Applied Ocean Research, Vol. 43, pp. 256–263, DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2013.10.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harireche, O., Mehravar, M., and Alani, A. M. (2014). “Soil conditions and bounds to suction during the installation of caisson foundations in sand,” Ocean Engineering, Vol. 88, pp. 164–173, DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.06.033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Z. P., Wang, R., and Xia, X. B. (2015). “Modifying the formula of the ultimate bearing capacity of a shallow circular foundation,” Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1–7, DOI: 10.1061/JHTRCQ.0000419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. (1950). The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ibsen, L. B. (2008). “Implementation of a new foundations concept for offshore wind farms.” In: Proceedings of the Nordisk Geoteknikermøte Nr. 15. NGM 2008, Sandefjord, Norway, pp. 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jostad, H. P. and Andersen, K. H. (2006). “Potential benefits of using skirted foundations for jack-up platforms.” In: Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference. Paper No. OTC 18016, Houston. DOI: 10.4043/18016-MS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. S., Lee, S. T., and Kim, J. H. (2016). Centrifuge model tests on installation of suction caissons in sand. “Japanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication.” Vol. 4, No. 4, pp.73–77, DOI: 10.3208/jgssp.v04.k05.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, D. Y., Zhang, Y. K., Gao, Y. F., and Song, Y. J. (2012). “Model tests on penetration of suction anchors in medium-coarse sand,” Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 34, No. 12, pp. 2278–2283. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerhof, G. G. (1951). “The ultimate bearing capacity of foundations,” Geotechnique, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 301–332, DOI: 10.1680/geot.1951. 2.4.301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi, K. (1943). Theoretical soil mechanics, New York: Wiley John.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tjelta, T. I. (1995). “Geotechnical experience from the installation of the europipe jacket with bucket foundations.” In: Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference. Paper No. OTC 7795, DOI: 10.4043/7795-MS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjelta, T. I., Guttormsen, T. R., and Hermstad, J. (1986). “Large scale penetration test at a deepwater site.” Proc., Offshore Technology Conf., OTC 5103, 18th Ed., 201–212, DOI: 10.4043/5103-MS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran, M. N., Randolph, M. F., and Airey, D. W. (2005). “Study of seepage flow and sand plug loosening in installation of suction caissons in sand.” Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Seoul. pp. 516–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran, M. N. and Randolph, M. F. (2008). “Variation of suction pressure during caisson installation in sand,” Geotechnique, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 1–11, DOI: 10.1680/geot.2008.58.1.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S. H., Zheng, Q. A., and Liu, X. A. (2004). “Finite element analysis of suction penetration seepage field of bucket foundation platform with application to offshore oilfield development,” Ocean Engineering, Vol. 31, pp. 1591–1599, DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dayong Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Y., Li, D., Zhang, Y. et al. Determination of Maximum Penetration Depth of Suction Caissons in Sand. KSCE J Civ Eng 22, 2776–2783 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1469-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1469-x

Keywords

Navigation