Abstract
The Muskingum model has been widely utilized for flood routing by water resources engineers for decades. Since the relation between channel storage and weighted summation of inflow and outflow seems to be nonlinear, a constant exponent parameter is used to account for this nonlinearity. On the other hand, the nonlinear Muskingum models with constant parameters cannot address variation of Muskingum parameters during flood period. In this paper, fourteen new Muskingum models with variable parameters are proposed. In these models, the routing period is divided into two or three sub-periods and the proposed versions of the Muskingum models can possess parameters with different values in these sub-periods. This capability enhances the Muskingum flood routing approach to better capture the reach characteristics and subsequently improve the routing results. The flood routing results for the selected data set demonstrate that three variable-parameter model reduces the SSQ value more than 89% comparing with the best three constant-parameter Muskingum model in the literature. Additionally, it was concluded that considering x-parameter as a variable parameter during a flood period affects the parameter estimation more than imposing the K- and m-parameters to be variable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afzali, S. H. (2016). “Variable-parameter Muskingum model.” Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, Vol. 40, No. 1), pp. 59–68, DOI: 10.1007/s40996-016-0001-8.
Afzali, S. H., Darabi, A., and Niazkar, M. (2016) “Steel frame optimal design using MHBMO algorithm.” International Journal of Steel Structures, Vol. 16, No. 2), pp. 455–465, DOI: 10.1007/s13296-016-6016-y.
Barati, R. (2011). “Parameter estimation of nonlinear Muskingum models using Nelder-Mead Simplex algorithm.” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 11), pp. 946–954, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE) HE.1943-5584.0000379.
Barati, R. (2013). “Application of excel solver for parameter estimation of the nonlinear Muskingum models.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 5), pp. 1139–1148, DOI: 10.1007/s12205-013-0037-2.
Chu, H.-J. (2009). “The Muskingum flood routing model using a Neuro fuzzy approach.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 5), pp. 371–376, DOI: 10.1007/s12205-009-0371-6.
Chu, H.-J. and Chang, L.-C. (2009). “Applying particle swarm optimization to parameter estimation of the nonlinear Muskingum model.” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 9), pp. 1024–1027, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000070.
Das, A. (2004). “Parameter estimation for Muskingum models.” Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 2), pp. 140–147, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2004)130:2(140).
Easa, S. (2013). “Improved nonlinear muskingum model with variable exponent parameter.” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 12), pp. 1790–1794, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000702.
Geem, Z. W. (2006). “Parameter estimation for the nonlinear Muskingum model using the BFGS technique.” Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Vol. 132, No. 5), pp. 474–478, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2006)132:5(474).
Geem, Z. W. (2010). “Parameter estimation of the nonlinear Muskingum model using parameter-setting-free harmony search.” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 8), pp. 684–688, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000352.
Gill, M. A. (1978). “Flood routing by the Muskingum method.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 36, No. 3), pp. 353–363, DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(78)90153-1.
Guang-Te, W. and Singh, V. (1992). “Muskingum method with variable parameters for flood routing in channels.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 134, No. 1), pp. 57–76, DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(92)90028-T.
Karahan, H., Gurarslan, G., and Geem, Z. W. (2013). “Parameter estimation of the nonlinear Muskingum flood-routing model using a hybrid harmony search algorithm.” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 3), pp. 352–360, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584. 0000608.
Karahan, H. (2014). “Discussion of “Improved Nonlinear Muskingum Model with Variable Exponent Parameter” by Said M. Easa.” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 10, 07014007, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001045.
Karahan, H., Gurarslan, G., and Geem, Z. W. (2015). “A new nonlinear Muskingum flood routing model incorporating lateral flow.” Engineering Optimization, Vol. 47, No. 6), pp. 737–749, DOI: 10.1080/0305215X.2014.918115.
Kim, J. H., Geem, Z. W., and Kim, E. S. (2001). “Parameter estimation of the nonlinear Muskingum model using harmony search.” JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 37, No. 5), pp. 1131–1138, DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb03627.x.
Lamberti, P. and Pilati, S. (1988). “A simplified flood routing model: variable parameter Muskingum (VPM).” Meccanica, Vol. 23, No. 2), pp. 81–87, DOI: 10.1007/BF01556705.
Luo, J. and Xie, J. (2010). “Parameter estimation for nonlinear Muskingum model based on immune clonal selection algorithm.” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 10), pp. 844–851, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000244.
Mohan, S. (1997). “Parameter estimation of nonlinear Muskingum models using genetic algorithm.” Journal of hydraulic engineering, Vol. 123, No. 2), pp. 137–142, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429 (1997)123:2(137).
Niazkar, M. and Afzali, S. (2015a). “Assessment of modified honey bee mating optimization for parameter estimation of nonlinear Muskingum models.” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 4, 04014055, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001028.
Niazkar, M. and Afzali, S. H. (2015b). “Optimum design of lined channel sections.” Water Resources Management, Vol. 29, No. 6), pp. 1921–1932, DOI:10.1007/s11269-015-0919-9.
Niazkar, M. and Afzali, S. H. (2016a). “Application of new hybrid optimization technique for parameter estimation of new improved version of Muskingum model.” Water Resources Management, DOI: 10.1007/s11269-016-1449-9.
Niazkar, M. and Afzali, S. H. (2016b). “Streamline performance of Excel in stepwise implementation of numerical solutions.” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, Vol. 24, No. 4), pp. 555–566. DOI: 10.1002/cae.21731.
O’Donnell, T., Pearson, C. P., and Woods, R. A. (1988). “Improved fitting for three-parameter Muskingum procedure.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 114, No. 5), pp. 516–528, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1988)114:5(516).
Perumal, M. (1994). “Hydrodynamic derivation of a variable parameter Muskingum method: 1. theory and solution procedure.” Hydrological sciences journal, Vol. 39, No. 5), pp. 431–442, DOI: 10.1080/02626669409492766.
Perumal, M. and Raju, K. G. R. (1998). “Variable-parameter stage hydrograph routing method. ii: Evaluation.” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 2), pp. 115–121, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE) 1084-0699(1998)3:2(115).
Ponce, V. and Changanti, P. (1994). “Variable-parameter Muskingum-Cunge method revisited.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 162, No. 3), pp. 433–439, DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(94)90241-0.
Tang, X.-N., Knight, D. W., and Samuels, P. G. (1999). “Volume conservation in variable parameter Muskingum-Cunge method.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 125, No. 6), pp. 610–620, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:6(610).
Tung, Y.-K. (1985). “River flood routing by nonlinear Muskingum method.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 111, No. 12), pp. 1447–1460, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1985)111:12(1447).
Wilson, E. M. (1974). Engineering hydrology, Hampshire, United Kingdom: Macmillan Education LTD.
Xu, D.-M., Qiu, L., and Chen, S.-Y. (2011). “Estimation of nonlinear Muskingum model parameter using differential evolution.” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 2), pp. 348–353, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000432.
Yoon, J. and Padmanabhan, G. (1993). “Parameter estimation of linear and nonlinear Muskingum models.” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 119, No. 5), pp. 600–610, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1993)119:5(600).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Niazkar, M., Afzali, S.H. New nonlinear variable-parameter Muskingum models. KSCE J Civ Eng 21, 2958–2967 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-0652-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-0652-4