Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of compression load test interpretation criteria for driven precast concrete pile capacity

  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An extensive evaluation of capacity interpretation criteria is presented for driven Precast Concrete (PC) piles under axial compression loading. A database of static load tests for round and square cross-section piles under both drained and undrained loading was developed and utilized in the analysis. The compiled data are generalized into four groups (round — drained, square — drained, round — undrained, and square — undrained) to examine the differences in their behavior. Generally, similar trends for each criterion are noted for the four groups. Statistical analyses show a decreasing COV with increasing pile displacement, and the drained load tests show less variability than the undrained load tests. For drained loading, somewhat higher interpreted capacities are exhibited by round piles than by square piles. In addition, a slightly stiffer normalized load-displacement curve is shown for the drained loading compared to the undrained loading. The drained and undrained databases are further sub-divided by hammer type (drop, air/steam, diesel, and hydraulic) to explore the effects of driving energy and driving resistances on pile capacity. Based on these analyses, the relative merits and interrelationships of these criteria are established, and design recommendations for the use of these methods are suggested in terms of normalized capacity and displacement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chen, Y.-J., Chang, H.-W., and Kulhawy, F. H. (2008). “Evaluation of uplift interpretation criteria for drilled shaft capacity.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Engrg., ASCE, Vol. 134, No. 10, pp. 1459–1468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-J. and Fang, Y.-C. (2009). “Critical evaluation of compression interpretation criteria for drilled shafts.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Engrg., ASCE, Vol. 135, No. 8, pp. 1056–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, F. K. (1970). “Estimation of the ultimate load of piles not carried to failure.” Proc., 2nd Southeast Asian Conf. Soil Engrg., Singapore, pp. 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davisson, M. T. (1972). “High capacity piles.” Proc., Lect. Series on Innov. in Found. Const., ASCE, Illinois Section, Chicago, p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBeer, E. E. (1970). “Experimental determination of shape factors of sand.” Geotechnique, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 387–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duzceer, R. and Saglamer A. (2002). “Evaluation of pile load test results.” Proc., 9th Int. Conf. Piling and Deep Found., Deep Foundation Institute, Nice, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellenius, B. H. (1975). “Test loading of piles-methods, interpretation and new proof testing procedure.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., Vol. 101, No. 9, pp. 855–869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellenius, B. H. (2006). Basics of foundation design, Electronic Ed. http://www.Fellenius.net.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, F. M. and Hoy, H. E. (1970). “Pile load tests including quick load test method, conventional methods, and interpretations.” Research Record 333, Hwy. Res. Brd., Washington, pp. 74–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirany, A. and Kulhawy, F. H. (1988). Conduct and interpretation of load tests on drilled shaft foundations: Detailed guidelines. Rpt EL-5915(1), EPRI, Palo Alto, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirany, A. and Kulhawy, F. H. (1989). “Interpretation of load tests on drilled shafts (2): Axial uplift.” Found. Engrg.,: Current Princ. & Pract. (GSP22), ASCE, New York, pp. 1150–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirany, A. and Kulhawy, F. H. (2002). “On the interpretation of drilled foundation load test results.” Deep Found. 2002 (GSP 116), ASCE, Reston, pp. 1018–1028.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke, T. D. and Kulhawy, F. H. (1985). “Observations on load tests on drilled shafts.” Drilled Piers and Caissons II, ASCE, New York, pp. 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi, K. and Peck, R. B. (1967). Soil mechanics in engineering practice, 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Veen, C. (1953). “The bearing capacity of a pile.” Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Soil Mech. and Found. Engrg., Vol. 2, pp. 84–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Cecilia M. Marcos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marcos, M.C.M., Chen, YJ. & Kulhawy, F.H. Evaluation of compression load test interpretation criteria for driven precast concrete pile capacity. KSCE J Civ Eng 17, 1008–1022 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0262-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0262-8

Keywords

Navigation