Skip to main content
Log in

Constitutive behavior of binary mixtures of kaolin and glass beads in direct shear

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

Composite soils having a wide range of particle size may be the most commonly encountered materials in geotechnical engineering practice. This study involves 21 direct shear tests to investigate the constitutive behavior of composite soils within the normal stress range from 50 to 200 kPa. The samples are mixtures of fine (kaolin) and coarse (glass beads) fractions at various proportions. The properties of the samples considered in the investigation are particle size distribution, water content of sheared specimens, structural features of shear surface and residual shear strength. It is shown that the particle size distribution influences the void ratio produced with the same compaction effort. Increasing fine fraction from zero to a threshold value (approximately 20–30%) causes a decrease in void ratio of the mixture. Beyond this threshold, a further increase of fine fraction causes an increase in void ratio. High proportion of fine fraction causes: (1) lower water content of shear zones relative to outer zones, (2) densification process within shear zone, (3) well slickensided shear surfaces, and (4) shearing in sliding mode and hence low residual shear strength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Society for Testing Methods (2004). Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions, ASTM D3080-90.

  • American Society for Testing Methods (2010) Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils, ASTM D4318-10.

  • Brandon, T. L., Filz, G. M., and Duncan, J. M. (1991). Review of landslide investigation, phase I — Part B, Olmstead locks and dams, Report Prepared for the Louisville District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

  • Bishop, A. W. (1971). “Shear strength parameters for undisturbed and remoulded specimens.” Proc. Roscoe Mem. Symp., Cambridge, Foulis and Co., pp. 3–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Standard Institution (2010). Code of practice for site investigations, BS 5930:1999+A2 2010.

  • Day, R. W. (1989). “Relative compaction of fills having oversized particles.” J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, Vol. 115, No. 4, pp. 1487–1491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyskin, A. V., Estrin, Y., Kanel-Belov, A. J., and Pasternak, E. (2001). “Toughening by fragmentation — How topology helps.” Adv. Eng. Mater., Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 885–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuoka, H., Sassa, K., Wang, G. and Sasaki, R. (2006). “Observation of shear zone development in ring-shear apparatus with a transparent shear box.” Landslides, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 239–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, T. S. and Saxena, S. K. (1991). “A general formula for determining density of compacted soils with oversize particles.” Soils and Foundations, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 161–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewell, R. A. and Worth, C. P. (1987). “Direct shear tests on reinforced sand.” Geotechnique, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, T. C. (1977). “Residual strengths of mineral mixtures.” Proc., 9th I.C.S.M.F.E., Vol. 1, pp. 155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemos, L. J. L. (1986). The effect of rate of shear on residual strength soil, PhD Thesis, University of London.

  • Li, Y. R. and Aydin, A. (2010). “Behavior of rounded granular materials in direct shear: mechanisms and quantification of fluctuations.” Engrg. Geol., Vol. 115, Nos. 1–2, pp. 96–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. R., Chan, L. S., Yeung, A. T., and Xiang, X. Q. (2011). “Effects of test conditions on shear behavior of composite soil.” Geotech. Engrg., Proc. ICE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/geng.11.00013.

  • Liu, X. L., Loo, H., Min, H., Deng, J. H., Tham, L. G., and Lee, C. F. (2006). “Shear strength of slip soils containing coarse particles of Xietan landslide.” Proc. of Sess. of GeoSh. 2006, Shanghai, pp. 195–207.

  • Lupini, J. F. (1980). The residual strength of soils, PhD Thesis, University of London.

  • Lupini, J. F., Skinner, A. E., and Vaughan, P. R. (1981). “The drained residual strength of cohesive soils.” Geotechnique, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 181–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesri, G. and Shahien, M. (2003). “Residual shear strength mobilized in first-time slope failure.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., Vol. 129, No. 1, pp. 12–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. K. (1993). Fundamentals of soil behavior, 2nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oda, M. and Konishi, J. (1974). “Microscopic deformation mechanism of granular material in simple shear.” Jap. Soc. Soil Mech. Found. Engrg., Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. D. F., Dijkstra, T. A., and Smalley, I. J. (1994). “Particle packing from an earth science point of view.” Earth Sci. Rev., Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed, H. B., Woodward, R. J., and Lundgren, R. (1964). “Clay mineralogical aspects of the Atterberg limits.” Journal A.S.C.E., Vol. 90, No. SM4, pp. 107–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seycek, J. (1978). “Residual shear strength of soils.” Bull. Int. Ass. Engng Geol., Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 73–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, B. and Bore, P. K. (2003). “Plastic limit, liquid limit and undrained shear strength of soil — reappraisal.” J. Geotech. Geoenvir. Engrg., Vol. 129, No. 8, pp. 774–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelly, T. L. and Daniel, D. E. (1993). “Effect of gravel on hydraulic conductivity of compacted soil liners.” J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, Vol. 119, No. 1, pp. 54–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimobe, S. and Moroto, N. (1995). “A new classification chart for sand liquefaction.” In: Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Balkema, Rotterdam, K. Ishihara (ed.), The Netherlands, pp. 315–320.

  • Simoni, A. and Houlsby, G. T. (2006). “The direct shear strength and dilatancy of sand-gravel mixtures.” Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 523–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skempton, A. W. (1964). “The long term stability of clay slopes.” Geotechnique, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skempton, A. W. (1985). “Residual strength of clays in landslides, folded strata and the laboratory.” Geotechnique, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, T. D. and Eid, H. T. (1994). “Drained residual strength of cohesive soils.” J. Geotech.Geoenvir. Engrg., ASCE, Vol. 120, No. 5, pp. 856–871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsuoka, F., Nakamura, S., Huang, C.-C., and Tani, K. (1990). “Strength anisotropy and shear band direction in plane strain tests on sand.” Soils and Foundations, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. W. (1948). Fundamentals of soil mechanics, John Wiley and Sons, New York, p. 700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, B. and Marui, H. (2005). “A new method for the correlation of residual shear strength of the soil with mineralogy composition.” J. of Geotech. and Geoenvir. Engrg., Vol. 131, No. 9, pp. 1139–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallejo, L. E. and Mawby, R. (2000). “Porosity influence on the shear strength of granular material-clay mixtures.” Engrg. Geol., Vol. 58, Nos. 1–2, pp. 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, P. R., Hight, D. W., Sodha, V. G., and Walbancke, H. J. (1978). “Factors controlling the stability of clay fills in Britain.” Clay Fills, ICE, pp. 203–217.

  • Voight, B. (1973). “Correlation between Atterberg plasticity limits and residual shear strength of natural soils.” Geotechnique, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 265–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen, B. P., Aydin, A. Duzgoren-Aydin, N. S., Li, Y. R., Chen, H. Y., and Xiao, S. D. (2007). “Residual strength of slip zones of large landslides in the Three Gorges Area, China.” Engineering Geology, Vol. 93, Nos. 1–2, pp. 82–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, P. K., Matsushima, K., and Tatsuoka F. (2008). “Effects of specimen size and some other factors on the strength and deformation of granular soil in direct shear tests.” Geotech. Test. J., ASTM, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z., Zhou, G., Liu, Z., Zhou, J., and Tian, Q. (2007). “Correcting method and error analysis for sample area in direct shear test.” J. China Univ. Mining Tech., Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 658–662.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanrong Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Y., Aydin, A., Xu, Q. et al. Constitutive behavior of binary mixtures of kaolin and glass beads in direct shear. KSCE J Civ Eng 16, 1152–1159 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-1613-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-1613-6

Keywords

Navigation