Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of pile settlement based on cone penetration test results: An ANN approach

  • Geotechnical Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several theoretical and experimental methods are available to estimate pile settlement. Due to difficulties for obtaining undisturbed samples, many of these methods have been focused on in-situ tests. The cone penetration test is one of the most effective in-situ tests because of its geometrical analogy with the piles as well as presenting continuous results along the depth. In this study, 1300 recorded settlement data from 101 pile loading tests with the CPT results were collected. Then Artificial Neural Network analyses (ANN) were conducted to obtain the best model for the prediction of pile settlement. The relative importance of input parameters has been evaluated using senility analysis. Accuracy predictions of the proposed model, along with other classic methods, were compared with the recorded values from the loading tests with the aid of different statistical parameters. This comparison indicated the superiority of the proposed model over previous methods. A parametric study has also been performed for the input parameters to study the consistency of the suggested model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Farsakh, M.Y. and Titi, H. H. (2004). “Assessment of direct cone penetration test methods for predicting the ultimate capacity of friction driven piles.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 9, pp. 935–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albiero, J. H., Sacilotto, A. C., De Mantilla, J. N. R., Teixeira, C. Z., and Carvalho, D. (1995). “Successive load tests on bored piles.” Proceedings of the 10th Pan-American Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Mexico City, October 29 November 3, Vol. 2, pp. 992–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altaee, A., Fellenius, B. H., and Evgin, E. (1992). “Axial load transfer for piles in sand. I: Tests on an instrumented precast pile.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, N. and De Alencar, D. (1975). “An approximate method to estimate the bearing capacity of piles.” Proc of the 5th Pan-American Conference of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Buenos Aires, Argentina, pp. 367–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardalan, H., Eslami, A., and Nariman-Zadeh, N. (2009). “Piles shaft capacity from CPT and CPTu data by polynomial neural networks and genetic algorithms.” Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 616–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avasarala, S. K. V., Davidson, J. L., and McVay, A. M. (1994). “An evaluation of predicted capacity of single piles from SPILE and UNIPILE programs.” Proceedings of the FHWA International Conference on Design and Construction of Deep Foundations, Orlando, FL, December 7-9, Vol. 2, pp. 712–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baziar, M. H. and Nilipour, N. (2003). “Evaluation of liquefaction potential using neural-networks and CPT results.” J. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., Vol. 23, No. 7, pp. 631–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baziar, M. H. and Ghorbani, A. (2005). “Evaluation of lateral spreading using artificial neural network.” Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 25, pp. 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baziar, M. H., Kashkooli, A., and Saeedi-Azizkandi, A. (2012). “Prediction of pile shaft resistance using Cone Penetration Tests (CPTs).” Comput. Geotech., Vol. 45, No. 45, pp. 74–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campanella, R. G. (1989). Use of in-situ tests in pile design, Rio de Janeiro, Br., pp. 199–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • CH2M HILL (1987). Geotechnical report on indicator pile testing and static pile testing, Berths 225-229 at Port of Los Angeles, CH2M Hill, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clisby, M. B., Scholtes, R. M., Corey, M. W., Cole, H. A., Teng, P., and Webb, J. D. (1978). An evaluation of pile bearing capacities, Final Report Ed., Mississippi State Highway Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, B. M. (1995). Principles of foundation engineering, 3rd Ed., PWS Publ. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eslami, A. and Fellenius, B. H. (1997). “Pile capacity by direct CPT and CPTu methods applied to 102 case histories.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 886–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, H. Y. (2001). Foundation engineering handbook, CBS Publishers and Distributors, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finno, R. J. (1989). Subsurface conditions and pile installation data, 1989 Foundation Engineering Congress Test Section, Evanston, IL, USA, pp. 1–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, W. G. K., Weltman, A. J., Randolph, M. F., and Elson, W. K. (2008). Piling engineering (4th Edition), Blackie Academic and Professional, Glasgow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambini, F. (1985). “Experience in Italy with centricast concrete piles.” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Penetrability and Drivability of Piles, San Francisco, August 10, Vol. 1, pp. 97–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garson, G. D. (1991). “Interpreting neural-network connection weights.” AI Expert, Vol. 6, No. 7, pp. 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haustorfer, I. J. and Plesiotis, S. (1988). “Instrumented dynamic and static pile load testing at two bridges.” Proceedings of the 5th Australia-New Zealand Conference on Geomechanics-Prediction versus performance, Sydney, August 22-28, pp. 514–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz, G. E., Stettler, D. R., and Crowser, J. C. (1981). Comparison of predicted and observed pile capacity, St. Louis, MO, USA, pp. 413–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. W. and Tarvin, P. A. (1993). Piles for marquette university math building, Dallas, TX, USA, pp. 91–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laier, J. E. (1994). “Predicting the ultimate compressive capacity of long 12HP74 steel pile.” Proceedings of the FHWA International Conference on Design and Construction of Deep Foundations, Orlando, FL., December 7-9, Vol. 2, pp. 1804–1818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. H. and Wysockey, M. H. (1999). “Accuracy of methods for predicting axial capacity of deep foundations.” Proc, OTRC’ 99 Conf: Analysis, Design, Construction, and Testing of Deep Foundation, GSP No. 88, ASCE, Reston, VA, pp. 190–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, T., Michi, Y., and Hirano, T. (1995). “Performance of axially loaded steel pipe piles driven in soft rock.” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 121, pp. 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayne, P. W. (1993). Axial load — Displacement behavior of drilled shaft foundations in Piedmont Residuum, U.S. Federal Highway Administration, Research Report FHWA-41-30–2175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerhof, G. G. (1976). “Bearing capacity and settlement of pile foundations.” ASCE J Geotech Eng. Div., Vol. 102, pp. 195–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevels, J. B. and Snethen, D. R. (1994). Comparison of settlement predictions for single pile in sand based on penetration test results, College Station, TX, USA, pp. 1028–1038.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, M. W. (1981). Field study of pile group action, US Federal Highway Administration, FHWA Report RD-81-002.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, M. W. (1988). Pile group prediction symposium, summary of prediction results, Federal Highway Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pooya Nejad, F., Jaksa, M. B., Kakhi, M., McCabe, B. A. (2009). “Prediction of pile settlement using artificial neural networks based on standard penetration test data.” Comput. Geotech., Vol. 36, No. 7, 1125–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulos, H. G. and Davis, E. H. (1980). Pile foundation analysis and design, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese, J. D., O’Neill, M. W., and Wang, S. T. (1988). Drilled shaft tests, Interchange of West Belt Roll Road and US290 Highway, Texas. Lymon C. Reese and Associates, Austin, Tex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, K. D. (1986). Uplift capacity of pile foundations using cpt data, Blacksburg, VA, USA, pp. 1077–1093.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumay, M. T. and Fakhroo, M. (1982). Friction pile capacity prediction in cohesive soils using electric quasi-static penetration tests, Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesic, A. S. (1977). Design of pile foundations, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Synthesis of Practice No. 42. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viergever, M. A. (1982). “Relation between cone penetration and static loading of piles on locally strongly varying sand layers.” Proceedings of the 2nd European Symposium on Penetration Testing, ESOPT-2, Amsterdam, May 24-27, Vol. 2, pp. 927–932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, L. (1982). Efficiency improvement of steel H-bearing piles, Arbed Research, Final Report 7210.SA/5-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yen, T.-L., Lin, H., Chin, C.-T., and Wang, R. F. (1989). Interpretation of instrumented driven steel pipe piles, Evanston, IL, USA, pp. 1293–1308.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Hassan Baziar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baziar, M.H., Saeedi Azizkandi, A. & Kashkooli, A. Prediction of pile settlement based on cone penetration test results: An ANN approach. KSCE J Civ Eng 19, 98–106 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-0628-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-0628-3

Keywords

Navigation