Abstract
With the purpose of investigating the influence of both fineness levels and replacement ratios of limestone filler on sodium sulfate attack, cement mortar and paste specimens incorporating the material were exposed to 5% sodium sulfate solution for 1 year. The resistance of mortar specimens to sulfate attack was evaluated by visual appearance, expansion and compressive strength measurements. Additionally, microstructural observations such as XRD and SEM/EDS were also performed on paste samples stored in similar conditions of sulfate attack. Experimental results demonstrated that the worst performance was noted in the mortar specimens with high replacement ratio as well as high fineness level of limestone filler, showing extensive surface damages in addition to significant expansion and strength loss. Thus, it was observed that both high replacement ratio and high fineness level have potentially a negative effect in resisting sodium sulfate attack. This phenomenon is likely attributed to thaumasite formation as a result of sulfate attack rather than gypsum formation. The present study may suggest useful information on both reasonable replacement ratio and fineness level for the application of limestone filler in sulfate environments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Amoudi, O. S. B., Maslehuddin, M., and Saadi, M. M. (1995). “Effect of magnesium sulfate and sodium sulfate on the durability performance of plain and blended cements.” ACI Mater. J., Vol. 92, No. 1, pp. 15–24.
Bensted, J. (2003). “Thaumasite — direct, woodfordite and other possible formation routes.” Cem. Concr. Compos., Vol. 25, No. 8, pp. 873–877.
Bickley, J. A., Hemmings, R. T., Hooton, R. D., and Balinski, J. (1994). “Thaumasite related deterioration of concrete structures.” In Concrete Technology, Past, Present and Future, ACI SP-144, American Concrete Institute, pp. 159–175.
Blanco-Varela, M. T., Aguilera, J., and Martinez-Ramirez, S. (2006). “Effect of cement C3A content, temperature and storage medium on thaumasite formation in carbonated mortars.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 707–715.
Brown, P. and Hooton, R. D. (2002). “Ettringite and thaumasite formation in laboratory concretes prepared using sulfate-resisting cements.” Cem. Concr. Compos., Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 361–370.
Collepardi, M. (1999). “Thaumasite formation and deterioration in historic buildings.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 147–154.
Figg, A. (1999). “Field studies of sulfate attack on concrete.” In: Marchand, J. and Skalny, J., ed., Material science of concrete special volume: Sulfate attack mechanism, The American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, pp. 315–324.
Gollop, R. S. and Taylor, H. F. W. (1992). “Microstructural and microanalytical studies of sulfate attack: I. Ordinary Portland cement paste.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 1027–1038.
Hartshorn, S. A., Sharp, J. H., and Swamy, R. N. (1999). “Thaumasite formation in Portland-limestone cement pastes.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 29, No. 8, pp. 1331–1340.
Hartshorn, S. A., Sharp, J. H., and Swamy, R. N. (2002). “The thaumasite form of sulfate attack in Portland-limestone cement mortars stored in magnesium sulfate solution.” Cem. Concr. Compos., Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 351–359.
Hobbs, D. W. and Taylor, M. G. (2000). “Nature of the thaumasite sulfate attack mechanism in field concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 529–533.
Hooton, R. D. and Emery, J. J. (1990). “Sulfate resistance of a Canadian slag cement.” ACI Mater. J., Vol. 87, No. 6, pp. 547–555.
Irassar, E. F. (2009). “Sulfate attack on cementitious materials containing limestone filler-A review.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 241–254.
Irassar, E. F., Bonavetti, V. L., and Gonzalez, M. (2003). “Microstructural study of sulfate attack on ordinary and limestone Portland cements at ambient temperature.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 31–41.
Irassar, E. F., Bonavetti, V. L., Trezza, M. A., and Gonzalez, M. A. (2005). “Thaumasite formation in limestone filler cements exposed to sodium sulphate solution at 20.” Cem. Concr. Compos., Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 77–84.
Kamile, T., Burak, F., Bulent, B., and Akın, I. A. (2009). “Effects of limestone replacement ratio on the sulfate resistance of Portland limestone cement mortars exposed to extraordinary high sulfate concentrations.” Construct. Build. Mater., Vol. 23, No. 7, pp. 2534–2544.
Khatri, R. P. and Sirivivatnanon, V. (1997). “Role of permeability in sulphate attack.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 27, No. 8, pp. 1179–1189.
Kohler, S., Heinz, D., and Urbonas, L. (2006). “Effect of ettringite on thaumasite formation.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 679–706.
Lawrence, C. D. (1992). “The influence of binder type on sulfate resistance.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 1047–1058.
Lee, S. T., Hooton, R. D., Kim, S. S., and Kim, E. K. (2006). “Effect of fineness of high-alumina ground blastfurnace slag on magnesium sulphate attack.” Mag. Concr. Res., Vol. 58, No. 5, pp. 301–311.
Lee, S. T., Hooton, R. D., Jung, H. S., Park, D. H., and Choi, C. S. (2008). “Effect of limestone filler on the deterioration of mortars and pastes exposed to sulfate solutions at ambient temperature.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 68–76.
Lucie, S., Mohammed, S., and Peter, J. M. B. (2003). “Influence of mix proportions on rheology of cement grouts containing limestone powder.” Cem. Concr. Compos., Vol. 25, No. 7, pp. 737–749.
Mazloom, M., Ramezanianpour, A. A., and Brooks, J. J. (2004). “Effect of silica fume on mechanical properties of high-strength concrete.” Cem. Concr. Compos., Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 347–357.
Mehta, P. K. (1983). “Mechanism of sulfate attack on Portland cement concrete-another look.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 401–406.
Menendez, G., Bonavetti, V., and Irassar, E. F. (2003). “Strength development of ternary blended cement with limestone filler and blast-furnace slag.” Cem. Concr. Compos., Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 61–67.
Neto, C. S., and Campiteli, V. C. (1990). “The influence of limestone additions on the rheological properties and water retention value of Portland cement slurries.” P. Klieger, R. D. Hooton (Eds.), Carbonate Additions to Cement, STP 1064, ASTM, Philadelphia, pp. 24–29.
Qian, X. and Li, Z. (2001). “The relationship between stress and strain for high-performance concrete with metakaolin.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 31, No. 11, pp. 1607–1611.
Ramezanianpour, A. M. and Hooton, R. D. (2013). “Thaumasite sulfate attack in Portland and Portland-limestone cement mortars exposed to sulfate solution.” Construct. Build. Mater., Vol. 40, pp. 162–1734.
Sahu, S., Badger, S., and Thaulow, N. (2002). “Evidence of thaumasite formation in Southern California concrete.” Cem. Concr. Compos., Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 379–384.
Santhanam, M., Cohen, M. D., and Olek, J. (2003). “Effects of gypsum formation on the performance of cement mortars during external attack.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 325–332.
Sawicz, Z. and Heng, S. S. (1996). “Durability of concrete with addition of limestone powder.” Mag. Concr. Res., Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 131–137.
Skaropoulou, A., Sotiriadis, K., Kakali, G., and Tsivilis, S. (2013). “Use of mineral admixtures to improve the resistance of limestone cement concrete against thauamsite form of sulfate attack.” Cem. Concr. Compos., Vol. 37, pp. 267–275.
Sotiriadis, K., Nikolopoulou, E., Tsivilis, S., Pavlou, A., Chaniokakis, E., and Swamy, R. N. (2013). “The effect of chlorides on the thaumasite form of sulfate attack of limestone cement concrete containing mineral admixtures at low temperature.” Construct. Build. Mater., Vol. 43, pp. 156–164.
Tian, B. and Cohen, M. D. (2000). “Expansion of Alite paste caused by gypsum formation during sulfate attack.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 24–25.
Torii, K., Taniguchi, K., and Kawamura, M., (1995). “Sulfate resistance of high fly ash content concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 759–768.
Tsivilis, S., Kakali, G., Skaropoulou, A., Sharp, J. H., and Swamy, R. N. (2003a). “Use of mineral admixtures to prevent thaumasite formation in limestone cement mortar.” Cem. Concr. Compos., Vol. 25, No. 8, pp. 969–976.
Tsivilis, S., Tsantilas, J., Kakali, G., Chaniotakis, E., and Sakellariou, A. (2003b). “The permeability of Portland limestone cement concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 33, No. 9, pp. 1465–1471.
Vuk, T., Tinta, V., Gabrovsek, R., and Kaucic, V. (2001). “The effects of limestone addition, clinker type and fineness on properties of Portland cement.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 135–139.
Vuk, T., Gabrovsek, R., and Kaucic, V. (2002). “The influence of mineral admixtures on sulfate resistance of limestone cement pastes aged in cold MgSO4 solution.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 32, No. 6, pp. 943–948.
Wee, T. H., Suryavanshi, A. K., Wong, S. F., and Anisur Rahman, K. M. (2000). “Sulfate resistance of concrete containing mineral admixture.” ACI Mater. J., Vol. 97, No. 5, pp. 536–549.
Zelic, J., Krstulovic, R., Tkalcec, E., and Krolo, P. (1999). “Durability of the hydrated limestone-silica fume Portland cement mortars under sulphate attack.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 819–826.
Zhou, Q., Hill, J., Cripps, E. A., Lynsdale, C. J., and Sharp, J. H. (2006). “The role of pH in thaumasite sulfate attack.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 160–170.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ryou, J., Lee, S., Park, D. et al. Durability of cement mortars incorporating limestone filler exposed to sodium sulfate solution. KSCE J Civ Eng 19, 1347–1358 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-0457-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-0457-4