Skip to main content
Log in

Accurate 3D reconstruction of subject-specific knee finite element model to simulate the articular cartilage defects

  • Published:
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The biomechanical relationship between the articular cartilage defect and knee osteoarthritis (OA) has not been clearly defined. This study presents a 3D knee finite element model (FEM) to determine the effect of cartilage defects on the stress distribution around the defect rim. The complete knee FEM, which includes bones, articular cartilages, menisci and ligaments, is developed from computed tomography and magnetic resonance images. This FEM then is validated and used to simulate femoral cartilage defects. Based on the obtained results, it is confirmed that the 3D knee FEM is reconstructed with high-fidelity level and can faithfully predict the knee contact behavior. Cartilage defects drastically affect the stress distribution on articular cartilages. When the defect size was smaller than 1.00 cm2, the stress elevation and redistribution were found undistinguishable. However, significant stress elevation and redistribution were detected due to the large defect sizes (⩾1.00 cm2). This alteration of stress distribution has important implications relating to the progression of cartilage defect to OA in the human knee joint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peña E, Calvo B, Martinez M A, et al. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the combined behavior of ligaments and menisci in the healthy human knee joint [J]. Journal of Biomechanics, 2006, 39(9): 1686–1701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Donahue T L, Hull M L, Rashid M M, et al. A finite element model of the human knee joint for the study of tibio-femoral contact [J]. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2002, 124(3): 273–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shirazi R, Shirazi-adl A, Hurtig M. Role of cartilage collagen fibrils networks in knee joint biomechanics under compression [J]. Journal of Biomechanics, 2008, 41(16): 3340–3348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shirazi R, Shirazi-adl A. Computational biomechanics of articular cartilage of human knee joint: Effect of osteochondral defects [J]. Journal of Biomechanics, 2009, 42(15): 2458–2465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang N H, Canavan P K, Nayeb-hashemi H, et al. Protocol for constructing subject-specific biomechanical models of knee joint [J]. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2010, 13(5): 589–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Peña E, Calvo B, Martinez M A, et al. Finite element analysis of the effect of meniscal tears and meniscectomies on human knee biomechanics [J]. Clinical Biomechanics, 2005, 20(5): 498–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Widuchowski W, Widuchowski J, Trzaska T. Articular cartilage defects: Study of 25 124 knee arthroscopies [J]. The Knee, 2007, 14(3): 177–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Papaioannou G, Demetropoulos C K, King Y H. Predicting the effects of knee focal articular surface injury with a patient-specific finite element model [J]. The Knee, 2010, 17(1): 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li G, Lopez O, Rubash H. Variability of a three-dimensional finite element model constructed using magnetic resonance images of a knee for joint contact stress analysis [J]. Biomedical Engineering, 2001, 123(4): 341–346.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Meakin J R, Shrive N G, Frank C B, et al. Finite element analysis of the meniscus: The influence of geometry and material properties on its behaviour [J]. The Knee, 2003, 10(1): 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pelletier J P, Raynauld J P, Berthiaume M J, et al. Risk factors associated with the loss of cartilage volume on weight-bearing areas in knee osteoarthritis patients assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: A longitudinal study [J]. Arthritis Research and Therapy, 2007, 9(4): R74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Weiss J A, Gardiner J C. Computational modeling of ligament mechanics [J]. Critical Review in Biomedical Engineering, 2001, 29(3): 303–371.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yang N, Nayeb-hashemi H, Canavan P K. The combined effect of frontal plane tibiofemoral knee angle and meniscectomy on the cartilage contact stresses and strains [J]. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2009, 37(11): 2360–2372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sathasivam S, Walker P S. A computer model with surface friction for the prediction of total knee kinematics [J]. Journal of Biomechanics, 1997, 30(2): 177–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Karataglis D, Green M A, Learmonth D J. Autologous osteochondral transplantation for the treatment of chondral defects of the knee [J]. The Knee, 2006, 13(1): 32–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li G, Gil J, Kanamori A, et al. A validated three-dimensional computational model of a human knee joint [J]. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 1999, 121(6): 657–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bowers M E, Tung G A, Fleming B C, et al. Quantification of meniscal volume by segmentation of 3T magnetic resonance images [J]. Journal of Biomechanics, 2007, 40(12): 2811–2815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fukubayashi T, Kurosawa H. The contact area and pressure distribution pattern of the knee: A study of normal and osteoarthrotic knee joints [J]. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 1980, 51(6): 871–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Walker P S, Erkman M J. The role of the menisci in force transmission across the knee [J]. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1975 (109): 184–192.

  20. Bendjaballah M Z, Shirazi-Adl A, Zukor D J. Biomechanics of the human knee joint in compression: Reconstruction, mesh generation and finite element analysis [J]. The knee, 1995, 2(2): 69–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Radin E L, Burr D B. Hypothesis: Joints can heal [J]. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, 1984, 13(3): 293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jackson D W, Lalor P A, Aberman H M, et al. Spontaneous repair of full-thickness defects of articular cartilage in a goat model: A preliminary study [J]. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2001, 83(1): 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hughston J C, Hergenroeder P T, Courtenay B G. Osteochondritis dissecans of the femoral condyles [J]. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1984, 66(9): 1340–1348.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Buckwalter J A, Brown T D. Joint injury, repair, and remodeling: Roles in post-traumatic osteoarthritis [J]. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2004 (423): 7–16.

  25. Peña E, Calvo B, Martinez M A, et al. Effect of the size and location of osteochondral defects in degenerative arthritis: A finite element simulation [J]. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2007, 37(3): 376–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qing-rong Xu  (徐卿荣).

Additional information

Foundation item: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81071235) and the Medicine and Engineering Interdisciplinary Fund of Shanghai Jiaotong University (No. YG2010MS26)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dong, Yf., Hu, Gh., Zhang, Ll. et al. Accurate 3D reconstruction of subject-specific knee finite element model to simulate the articular cartilage defects. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 16, 620–627 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-011-1199-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-011-1199-z

Key words

CLC number

Navigation