Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Theft of pharmaceuticals during transport in Europe

  • Published:
Journal of Transportation Security Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to identify and describe the scale of cargo theft in the European pharmaceutical supply chain in 2014. The study is based on a system-theoretical approach which emphasises a holistic rather than atomistic view. The research in this paper is deductive and descriptive in its nature and aims to present a current description of theft of pharmaceuticals in a European perspective. This paper’s hypotheses on cargo theft have been developed from theories of criminology, for applicable use, to strengthen the scientific field of logistics. A survey was conducted in autumn 2014 whereby the respondents were asked to provide their opinions in relation to eleven questions. The survey was sent out to all major players in the European pharmaceutical sector – manufacturers and logistics providers specializing in pharmaceuticals. The survey captured more or less 80 % of the European pharmaceutical manufacturers' market share. We found that the current threats against European pharmaceutical transport are small in relative occurrence terms (relatively few attacks on a yearly basis compared to other product categories) but on an impact basis thefts of pharmaceuticals place as one of the top targets (value wise) for criminals. This research supports other sources that the current geographical hot spot for these thefts in Europe is in Italy. The top risks are rated as either robbery or theft from vehicle at unsecure parking areas. These two different modi operandi can be divided into one frequency related threat (theft from unsecure parking) and one impact related risk (robbery).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal R, Bohinc J (2012) Black swans and supply chain strategic necessity. J Transp Secur 5(1):39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck A, Chapman P (2003) Hot spots in the supply chain: developing an understanding of what makes some retail stores vulnerable to shrinkage. ECR Europe, Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein P (1996) Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk. Wiley, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga AA (2005) Hot spots policing and crime prevention: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Exp Criminol 1:317–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher M, Lee H (2004) Mitigating supply chain risk through improved confidence. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 34(5):388–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke RV (1999) “Hot Products: Understanding, Anticipating and Reducing Demand for Stolen Goods”, Police Research Series Paper, No. 112. Home Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke RV, Cornish D (2003) Opportunities, precipitators and criminal decisions: a reply to Wortley’s critique of situational crime prevention. Crime Prevention Studies 16:41–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen LE, Felson M (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. Am Sociol Rev 44:588–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colicchia C, Strozzi F (2012) Supply chain risk management: a new methodology for a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 17(4):403–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ECMT (2001), Theft of goods and goods vehicles. CEMT/CM (2001)19, Lissabon.

  • ECR (2003) Shrinkage: A Collaborative Approach to Reducing Stock Loss in the Supply Chain. ECR Europe, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekwall D (2009) Managing the risk for antagonistic threats against the transport network. Division of Logistics and Transportation, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekwall D (2010) On analyzing the official statistics for antagonistic threats against transports in EU: a supply chain risk perspective. J Transp Secur 3(4):213–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekwall D, Lantz B (2013) Seasonality of cargo theft at transport chain locations. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 43(9):728–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekwall D, Lantz B (2015) Cargo theft at non-secure parking locations. Int J Retail Distrib Manag 43(3):204–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EP - European Parliament’s Committee on Transport and Tourism (2007), Organised theft of commercial vehicles and their loads in the European Union, European Parliament, Brussels.

  • EU ICS (2005) The burden of crime in the EU, a comparative analysis of the European Survey of Crime and Safety (EU ICS). Brussels: EU ICS

  • FreightWatch International (2015) FWI SCIC database. FreightWatch International, Supply Chaing Intelligence Center

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosdick M (1997) The techniques of risk management are insufficient in themselves. Disaster Prevention and Management 6(3):165–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FWI SCIC (2015) European cargo crime threat assessment. FreightWatch International, Supply Chain Intelligence Center

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie J, Guthrie A (2006) A research agenda for loss prevention. Int J Retail Distrib Manag 34(11):873–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliar C, Lonie A, Power D, Sinclair D (2001) “Attitudes of UK managers to risk and uncertainty”. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland. Bell and Bain Ltd., Glasgow

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard DW (2008) The failure of risk management. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Interpol (2012) Pharmaceutical crime. Lyon, Interpol

    Google Scholar 

  • IRU (2008) Attacks on drivers of international heavy goods vehicles. International Road Transport Union, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Jüttner U, Peck H, Christopher M (2003) Supply chain risk management: outlining an agenda for future research. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 6(4):197–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan O, Burnes B (2007) Risk and supply chain management: creating a research agenda. Int J Logist Manag 18(2):197–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lab SP (2000) Crime prevention: Approaches, practices and evaluations, Fourth edn. Andersson Publishing Co, Cincinnati US

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalwani CS, Disney SM, Naim MM (2006) On assessing the sensitivity to uncertainty in distribution network design. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 36(1):5–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangan J, Lalwani C, Gardner B (2004) Combining quantitative and qualitative methodologies in logistics research. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 34(7):565–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manuj I, Mentzer JT (2008a) Global supply chain risk management. J Bus Logist 29(1):133–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manuj I, Mentzer JT (2008b) Global supply chain risk management strategies. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 38(3):192–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell V-W (1999) Consumer perceived risk: conceptualisations and models. Eur J Mark 33(1/2):163–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore PG (1983) The business of risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norrman A, Jansson U (2004) Ericsson’s proactive supply chain risk management approach after a serious sub-supplier accident. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 34(5):434–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M (2002) Re-thinking science. Blackwell Publishers ltd, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce G, Spaar S, Briggs L (1988) The character of police work: Strategic and tactical implications. Center for Applied Social Research, Northeastern University, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao S, Goldsby TJ (2009) Supply chain risks: a review and typology. Int J Logist Manag 20(1):97–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riccardi M., Dugato M. and Polizzotti M. (2014), The theft of medicines from Italian hospitals. Milan-Trento, Transcrime – Joint Research Centre on Transnational Crime

  • Sheffi Y (2001) Supply chain management under the threat of international terrorism. Int J Logist Manag 12(2):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman LW, Gartin PR, Buerger ME (1989) “Hot spots of predatory crime: routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology 27(1):27–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock JR (1997) Applying theories from other disciplines to logistics. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 27(9):515–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavares C, Thomas G (2009) Crime and criminal justice. Eurostat - Statistics in focus - Population and social conditions, 36/2009. Luxembourg: Eurostat

  • Transcrime (2012) Analysis of the draft protocol to eliminate illicit trade in tobacco products. Milan, Transcrime

    Google Scholar 

  • TruckPol (2007) TruckPol annual report 2007, Homeoffice, TruckPol, UK.

  • Tummala R, Schoenherr T (2011) Assessing and managing risks using the supply chain risk management process (SCRMP). Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 16(6):474–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner SM, Bode C (2008) An empirical examination of supply chain performance along several dimensions of risk. J Bus Logist 29(1):307–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters D (2007) Supply Chain Risk Management: Vulnerability and Resilience in Logistics. Kogan-page, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd D, Maher L, Sherman L (1992) Contrasting crime general and crime specific theory: the case of hot spots of crime. Adv Criminol Theory 4:45–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Werthman C, Piliavin I (1967) Gang members and the police. In: Bordua D (ed) The police: six sociological essays. Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 56–98

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Textiles, Engineering and Business, University of Borås, 501 90, Borås, Sweden

    Daniel Ekwall

  2. Hanken School of Economics, 00101, Helsinki, Finland

    Daniel Ekwall

  3. FreightWatch International, Head of EMEA Intelligence, Brussels, Belgium

    Helmut Brüls

  4. Freightwatch International, EMEA Intelligence Analyst, Dublin, Ireland

    Daniel Wyer

Authors
  1. Daniel Ekwall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Helmut Brüls
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel Wyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Ekwall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ekwall, D., Brüls, H. & Wyer, D. Theft of pharmaceuticals during transport in Europe. J Transp Secur 9, 1–16 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-015-0162-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-015-0162-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation