Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating security screening checkpoints for domestic flights using a general microscopic simulation model

  • Published:
Journal of Transportation Security Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has established a list of items that are prohibited to be taken onboard an airplane. As a consequence passenger lines occasionally exceed into terminal halls, sometimes onto airports’ curbside. Today, the additional wait time and the inconvenience of searches experienced at security screening checkpoints are a matter of continuous concern. The purpose of the present study was to assess operational efficiency of the passenger processing system with a sole emphasis on the screening of passengers and their carry-on baggage. This study sought to define an acceptable wait time threshold, as well as provide general recommendations with respect to screening approach, screening procedures, and screening equipment. In addition, a sensitivity analyses was conducted by means of a general microscopic simulation model to test the impact of screeners’ performance and the effect of prescreening. The measures of effectiveness used in both analyses consist of average wait time, average service time, average queue length, and average throughput rate. It was concluded that significant improvements occur as the portion of passenger that is positively profiled increases, hence levering the pressure on secondary screening. Reduction in queue length, and thus wait time; occurred even at relatively high percentages of random selected passengers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • de Neufville R, Odoni A (2003) Airport systems: Planning, design, and management. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillingham G (2003) Transportation Security: Post-September 11th initiatives and long-term challenges. United States General Accounting Office, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias B (2005) Aviation security-related findings and recommendations of the 9/11 commission. Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress. Retrieved Feb. 10, 2013, from http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA453685

  • General Accounting Office (2001) Aviation security: Weaknesses in airport security and options for assigning screening responsibilities. United States General Accounting Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • House Committee on Homeland Security (2005) The Transportation Security Administration’s screening of airline pilots: sound security practice or waste of scarce resources: hearing before the Subcommittee on Economic Security, Infrastructure Protection, and Cybersecurity of the Committee on Homeland. United States: BiblioGov. Retrieved Nov. 5, 2012, from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-109hhrg23034/html/CHRG-109hhrg23034.htm

  • IATA (2005) Security manual. International Air Transport Association, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschenbaum A (2013) The cost of airport security: the passenger dilemma. J Air Transp Manag 30:39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leone K, Liu R (2003) Measures of effectiveness for passenger-baggage security screening. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1822(1):40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott J (2002) Tight security compels airport design shakeup. Aviat Wk Space Technol 156(7):48–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole R (2002) Improving Airport Passenger Screening. Los Angeles, CA, USA: Reason Public Policy Institute Foundation. Retrieved Jan. 5, 2013, from http://reason.org/files/ee580fb1515e98c9bd64e9aa5ea18ed3.pdf

  • Prichard J, MacDonald L (2004) Cyber terrorism: a study of the extent of coverage in computer security textbooks. J Inf Technol Educ 3:279–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson CV, Shrader S, Pendergraft DR, Johnson LM, Silbert KS (2002) The role of modeling demand in process re-engineering. In: Simulation Conference, 2002. Proceedings of the Winter, vol 2, pp 1454–1458. IEEE

  • Tampa International Airport (2012) 2012 Masterplan update. Terminal Facilities, Planning Analysis, Tampa International Airport. Retrieved Mar. 10, 2013, from http://www.tampaairport.com/AIRPORT_BUSINESS/master_plan/index.asp

  • Wensveen J (2012) Air transportation: A management perspective, 7th edn. Ashgate Publishing, pp 260–262

  • Wikipedia (2013) Transportation Security Administration. Retrieved Feb. 10, 2013, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transportation_Security_Administration

  • World Airport Awards (2013) The Worlds Best Airports. Retrieved Feb. 10, 2013, from http://www.worldairportawards.com/Awards_2013/top100.htm

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Delaware Center for Transportation (DCT). The authors express their sincere gratitude to Nelda E. Bravo, Head of the National Transportation Library of the U.S. Department of Transportation for her continuous support and advice throughout this project and Carlos H. Amado, Industrial Engineer for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security for assisting us enormously with the simulation model. In particular, the authors would like to thank Keith Wilschetz, Vice President of Planning at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, for sharing his findings on security screening checkpoints.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ardeshir Faghri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Boekhold, J., Faghri, A. & Li, M. Evaluating security screening checkpoints for domestic flights using a general microscopic simulation model. J Transp Secur 7, 45–67 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-013-0129-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-013-0129-8

Keywords

Navigation