Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Substrate Stiffness and Cell Area Predict Cellular Traction Stresses in Single Cells and Cells in Contact

  • Published:
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cells generate traction stresses against their substrate during adhesion and migration, and traction stresses are used in part by the cell to sense the substrate. While it is clear that traction stresses, substrate stiffness, and cell area are related, it is unclear whether or how area and substrate stiffness affect force generation in cells. Moreover, multiple studies have investigated traction stresses of single cells, but few have focused on forces exerted by cells in contact, which more closely mimics the in vivo environment. Here, cellular traction forces were measured where cell area was modulated by ligand density or substrate stiffness. We coupled these measurements with a multilinear regression model to show that both projected cell area and underlying substrate stiffness are significant predictors of traction forces in endothelial cells, and interestingly, substrate ligand density is not. We further explored the effect of cell–cell contact on the interplay between cell area, substrate stiffness, and force generation and found that again both area and stiffness play a significant role in cell force generation. These data indicate that cellular traction force cannot be determined by cell area alone and that underlying substrate stiffness is a significant contributor to traction force generation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. An, S. S., et al. Do biophysical properties of the airway smooth muscle in culture predict airway hyperresponsiveness? Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 35(1):55–64, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Califano, J. P., and C. A. Reinhart-King. A balance of substrate mechanics and matrix chemistry regulates endothelial cell network assembly. Cel. Mol. Bioeng. 1(2–3):122–132, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Califano, J. P., and C. A. Reinhart-King. Exogenous and endogenous force regulation of endothelial cell behavior. J. Biomech., 2009. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.012.

  4. Chen, C. S. Mechanotransduction—a field pulling together? J. Cell Sci. 121(Pt 20):3285–3292, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dembo, M., et al. Imaging the traction stresses exerted by locomoting cells with the elastic substratum method. Biophys. J. 70(4):2008–2022, 1996.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Dembo, M., and Y. L. Wang. Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. Biophys. J. 76(4):2307–2316, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. du Roure, O., et al. Force mapping in epithelial cell migration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102(7):2390–2395, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Engler, A., et al. Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. Biophys. J. 86(1 Pt 1):617–628, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Engler, A., L. Richert, J. Wong, C. Picart, and D. Discher. Surface probe measurements of the elasticity of sectioned tissue, thin gels and polyelectrolyte multilayer films: correlations between substrate stiffness and cell adhesion. Surf. Sci. 570:142–154, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Georges, P. C., and P. A. Janmey. Cell type-specific response to growth on soft materials. J. Appl. Physiol. 98(4):1547–1553, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo, W. H., et al. Substrate rigidity regulates the formation and maintenance of tissues. Biophys. J. 90(6):2213–2220, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lemmon, C. A., C. S. Chen, and L. H. Romer. Cell traction forces direct fibronectin matrix assembly. Biophys. J. 96(2):729–738, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lemmon, C. A., et al. Shear force at the cell-matrix interface: enhanced analysis for microfabricated post array detectors. Mech. Chem. Biosyst. 2(1):1–16, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li, B., et al. Spatial patterning of cell proliferation and differentiation depends on mechanical stress magnitude. J. Biomech. 42(11):1622–1627, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li, Y., Z. B. Hu, and C. F. Li. New method for measuring poisson ratio in polymer gels. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 50(6):1107–1111, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lo, C. M., et al. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys. J. 79(1):144–152, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Marganski, W. A., M. Dembo, and Y. L. Wang. Measurements of cell-generated deformations on flexible substrata using correlation-based optical flow. Methods Enzymol. 361:197–211, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Munevar, S., Y. Wang, and M. Dembo. Traction force microscopy of migrating normal and H-ras transformed 3T3 fibroblasts. Biophys. J. 80(4):1744–1757, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nelson, C. M., et al. Emergent patterns of growth controlled by multicellular form and mechanics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102(33):11594–11599, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ott, R. L., and M. Longnecker. An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury Press, 2001, 1184 pp.

  21. Paszek, M. J., and V. M. Weaver. The tension mounts: mechanics meets morphogenesis and malignancy. J. Mammary Gland. Biol. Neoplasia 9(4):325–342, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Paszek, M. J., et al. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell 8(3):241–254, 2005.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Pless, D. D., et al. Specific cell adhesion to immobilized glycoproteins demonstrated using new reagents for protein and glycoprotein immobilization. J. Biol. Chem. 258(4):2340–2349, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Reinhart-King, C. A. Endothelial cell adhesion and migration. Methods Enzymol. 443:45–64, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Reinhart-King, C. A., M. Dembo, and D. A. Hammer. Endothelial cell traction forces on RGD-derivatized polyacrylamide substrata. Langmuir 19(5):1573–1579, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Reinhart-King, C. A., M. Dembo, and D. A. Hammer. The dynamics and mechanics of endothelial cell spreading. Biophys. J. 89(1):676–689, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Reinhart-King, C. A., M. Dembo, and D. A. Hammer. Cell-cell mechanical communication through compliant substrates. Biophys. J. 95(12):6044–6051, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tsai, J., and L. Kam. Rigidity-dependent cross talk between integrin and cadherin signaling. Biophys. J. 96(6):L39–L41, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, N., et al. Micropatterning tractional forces in living cells. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 52(2):97–106, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, Y., et al. Integrins regulate VE-cadherin and catenins: dependence of this regulation on Src, but not on Ras. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103(6):1774–1779, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, Y. L., and R. J. Pelham, Jr. Preparation of a flexible, porous polyacrylamide substrate for mechanical studies of cultured cells. Methods Enzymol. 298:489–496, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yeung, T., et al. Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 60(1):24–34, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zemel, A., and S. A. Safran. Active self-polarization of contractile cells in asymmetrically shaped domains. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 76(2 Pt 1):021905, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a Scientist Development Grant from the American Heart Association and funding from the National Institutes of Health to CRK, and a Grant-In-Aid of Research from Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society to JPC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, 302 Weill Hall, 526 Campus Rd., Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA

    Joseph P. Califano & Cynthia A. Reinhart-King

Authors
  1. Joseph P. Califano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cynthia A. Reinhart-King
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cynthia A. Reinhart-King.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Califano, J.P., Reinhart-King, C.A. Substrate Stiffness and Cell Area Predict Cellular Traction Stresses in Single Cells and Cells in Contact. Cel. Mol. Bioeng. 3, 68–75 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-010-0102-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-010-0102-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation