Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Scaffolding Collaborative Reflective Writing in a VET Curriculum

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Vocations and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Learning journal writing is an effective tool to foster the development of reflective capacity in the context of Vocational Education and Training (VET) if conceived as a collection of descriptions and reflections on real professional experiences. Reporting professional situations in a learning journal outside the workplace in turn fosters the connection between places of learning. Taking into account that collaborative writing with peer-feedback stimulates reflective writing and that comparisons between different professional experience boosts reflection, we conducted a study based on peer-to-peer commenting and revising on a reflective journal entry. Considering that this kind of reflection needs to be properly stimulated and scaffolded, we implemented a 3 × 2 study with three different levels of prompts (low-medium-high) for revision and commenting and two kinds of tool (paper-based vs. computer-based). We measured the improvement of the quality of reflection between the initial drafts and the final revised texts on the basis of the reflective grid by Bain et al. (2002). Results show the impact of scaffolding in medium and high scaffolded conditions, whose texts significantly outperformed the low-scaffolded ones in terms of reflection. Revisions and comments are mostly related to the Reporting and Relating dimensions. Moreover, the study confirms the impact of scaffolding on the number of comments produced by peers in the different conditions, but no mediating effect of comments on the text quality was found. The type of tool used has a significant role in determining the quantity of comments developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarkrog, V. (2006). Practical training as a means of reflecting on practice: an evaluation of a vocational and education and training programme for rescue officers. Learning in Health and Social Care, 5, 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade, H. G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Education Leadership, 57, 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baartman, L., & De Bruijn, E. (2011). Integrating knowledge, skills and attitude: conceptualising learning processes towards vocational competence. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain, J. D., Ballantyne, R., Mills, C., & Lester, N. C. (2002). Reflecting on practice: Student teachers’ perspectives. Flaxton, Queensland: Post Pressed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, C., Little, J., Bethel, L., Chavkin, T., Fouquette, D., & Garufis, J. (2005). Reference guide to writing across the curriculum. Indiana: Parlor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, R., & Friedrich, T. (2006). Response to writing. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 222–234). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthold, K., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2007). Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts. Learning and Instruction, 17, 564–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biemans, H., Wesselink, R., Gulikers, J., Schaafsma, S., Verstegen, J., & Mulder, M. (2009). Towards competence-based VET: dealing with the pitfalls. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 61(3), 267–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2001). Learning through work: workplace affordances and individual engagement. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13(5), 209–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boldrini, E., & Cattaneo, A. (2012). Collaborative writing on professional experiences as a means for fostering reflective thinking in VET curricula. In C. Gelati, B. Arfé, & L. Mason (Eds.), Issues in writing research (pp. 180–188). Padova: Cleup.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boldrini, E., & Cattaneo, A. (2013). Written identifications of errors to learn professional procedures in VET. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 65(4), 525–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boscolo, P., & Ascorti, K. (2004). Effects of collaborative revision on children’s ability to write understandable narrative texts. In L. Allal, L. Chanquoy, & P. Largy (Eds.), Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 157–170). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boscolo, P., & Mason, L. (2001). Writing to learn, writing to transfer. In P. Tynjala, L. Mason, & K. Lonka (Eds.), Writing as a learning tool: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 83–104). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo, A., & Boldrini, E. (2009). 11 competences for the teacher using ICTs: A quali-quantitative research pattern. In U. Bernath, A. Szücs, A. Tait, & M. Vidal (Eds.), Distance and E-learning in transition learning innovation, technology and social challenges (pp. 261–286). London/Hoboke -NJ: ISTE/WILEY Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2011). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction, 20, 228–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Kwon, K. (2007). Learning writing by reviewing in science. In 8th International conference on computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 141–143). New Brunswick, NJ, USA: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A. (2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: generic and directed prompts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 91–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scaffolding students’ knowledge integration: prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 819–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A., & Miyake, N. (2004). Explorations of scaffolding in complex classroom systems: guest editors’ introduction. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 265–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bruijn, E., & Leeman, Y. (2011). Authentic and self-directed learning in vocational education: challenges to vocational educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 694–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, J. A., Wierstra, R. F., & Hermanussen, J. (2006). An exploration of the relationship between academic and experiential learning approaches in vocational education. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duijnhouwer, H., Prins, F. J., & Stokking, K. M. (2012). Feedback providing improvement strategies and reflection on feedback use: effects on students’ writing motivation, process, and performance. Learning and Instruction, 22(3), 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, D. (1999). Writing as a knowledge-constituting process. In M. Torrance & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production (pp. 139–160). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavota, M., Bétrancourt, M., & Schneider, D. (2010a). Writing and commenting on professional procedures. In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Learning in the disciplines: Proceedings of the 9th international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS 2010) – volume 1, full papers (pp. 683–689). Chicago IL: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavota, M., Cattaneo, A., Arn, C., Boldrini, E., Motta, E., Schneider, D. K., & Bétrancourt, M. (2010b). Computer-supported peer commenting: a promising instructional method to promote skill development in vocational education. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 62(4), 495–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding ill-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20, 304–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, I. M., & Ashley, K. D. (2012). Eliciting formative assessment in peer review. Journal of Writing Research, 4(2), 203–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, I. M., Ashley, K. D., & Schunn, C. D. (2012). Redesigning educational peer review interactions using computer tools: an introduction. Journal of Writing Research, 4(2), 111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instructions for adolescents students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & MacArthur, C. (2004). Writing instruction. In B. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (pp. 281–313). Orlando, FL: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1–27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. R. (2006). New directions in writing theory. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 28–40). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavioral Research Methods, 44, 924–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., & Boscolo, P. (2006). Motivation and writing. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 144–157). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiemstra, R. (2001). Uses and benefits of journal writing. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 90, 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, K., & Pressley, M. (1997). Scaffolding student learning. Instructional approaches & issues. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hübner, S., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2010). Writing learning journals: instructional support to overcome learning-strategy deficits. Learning and Instruction, 20, 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D. (2001). Reflective teaching and learning in the health profession. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., Jones, A., Loke, A., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., Tse, H., Webb, C., Wong, F., Wong, M., Wa Yan, P., & Yeung, E. (1996). Developing curricula to encourage students to wirite reflective journals. Educational Action Research, 4(3), 329–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning. Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, U.-M., & Stark, R. (2010). Reflection in example- and problem- based learning: effects of reflection prompts, feedback and cooperative learning. Evaluation & Research in Education, 23, 255–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, G. (2008). Examining the effects of selected computer-based scaffolds on preservice teachers’ levels of reflection as evidenced in their online journal writing. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.

  • Lai, G., & Calandra, B. (2007). Using online scaffolds to enhance preservice teachers’ reflective journal writing: a qualitative analysis. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 3(3), 66–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, D. Y. P., & Kember, D. (2003). The relationship between approaches to learning and reflection upon practice. Educational Psychology, 23(1), 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukinsky, J. (1990). Reflective withdrawal through journal writing. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Ed.), Fostering critical reflection in adulthood (pp. 213–234). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, C. (2006). The effects of new technologies on writing and writing processes. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 248–262). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, C. (2009). Reflections on research on writing and technology for struggling writers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(2), 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, K., Gordon, J., & MacLeod, A. (2009). Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14(4), 595–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauroux, L., Dehler-Zufferey, J., Jimenez, F., Wehren, R., Cattaneo, A., & Gurtner, J.-L. (2013). Autorégulation des apprentissages et dossiers de formation en formation professionnelle. In J.-L. Berger & F. Büchel (Eds.), L’apprentissage autorégulé : Perspectives théoriques et recherches empiriques (pp. 195–227). Nice: Ovadia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, K. (2002). Vocational education and training in transition: From Fordism to a learning economy. In W. Nijhof, A. Heikkinen, & L. Nieuwenhuis (Eds.), Shaping flexibility in vocational education and training: Institutional, curricular and professional conditions (pp. 17–33). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J. (1999). Reflection in learning & professional development: Theory and practice. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motta, E., Boldrini, E., & Cattaneo, A. (2013). Technologies to “bridge the gap” among learning contexts in vocational training. In P. M. Pumilia-Gnarini, E. Favaron, E. Pacetti, J. Bishop, & L. Guerra (Eds.), Handbook of research on didactic strategies and technologies for education: Incorporating advancements (Vol. 2, pp. 247–265). Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nystrand, M. (2006). The social and historical context for writing research. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 11–27). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poortman, C. L., Illeris, K., & Nieuwenhuis, L. (2011). Apprenticeship: from learning theory to practice. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 63(3), 267–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raizen, S. A. (1994). Learning and work: The research base. In Vocational education and training for youth: Towards coherent policy and practice (pp. 69–115). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosaen, C. L. (1989). Writing in the content areas: Reaching its potential in the learning process. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Teaching for meaningful understanding and self-regulated learning (pp. 153–194). Greenwich, Conn: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (2003). Key competencies for a successful life and a well-functioning society. Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, J. (2009). Understanding of work: The basis of competence development. In R. C. Velde (Ed.), International perspectives on competence in the workplace. Implication for research, policy and practice (pp. 3–20). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sarig, G. (2005). Fostering reflective writing by structuring writing-to-learn tasks. In G. Rilaarsdam, H. Van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Effective teaching and learning of writing: A handbook of writing in education (pp. 499–518). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Studies in Writing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schaap, H., Baartman, L. K. J., & De Bruijn, E. (2012). Students’ learning processes during school-based learning and workplace learning in vocational education: a review. Vocations and Learning, 5, 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, G. M., & Gradwohl Nash, J. (1991). Conceptualizing and measuring knowledge change due to wiriting. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 67–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segev-Miller, R. (2005). Writing-to-learn: Conducting a process log. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. Van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Effective teaching and learning of writing: A handbook of writing in education (pp. 533–546). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Studies in Writing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A., & Freeman, S. (2011). ‘Made in the trade’: youth attitudes toward apprenticeship certification. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 63, 345–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tynjälä, P. (2001). Writing, learning and the development of expertise in higher education. In P. Tynjälä, L. Mason, & K. Lonka (Eds.), Writing as a learning tool. Integrating theory and practice (pp. 37–56). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tynjälä, P. (2008). Perspectives into learning at the workplace. Educational Research Review, 3, 130–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tynjälä, P., Välimaa, J., & Boulton Lewis, G. (Eds.). (2006). Higher education and working life. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Woerkom, M. (2004). Kritisch reflectief werkgedrag: de verbinding tussen individueel leren en organisatieleren. [Critical reflective work behavior: the connection between individual learning and organizational learning]. Tijdschrift voor HRM, 3, 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virtanen, A., & Tynjälä, P. (2007). Students’ experiences of workplace learning in Finnish VET. European Journal of Vocational Training, 44(2), 199–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesselink, R., De Jong, C., & Biemans, H. (2010). Aspects of competence-based education as footholds to improve the connectivity between learning in school and in the workplace. Vocations and Learning, 3, 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 17(2), 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L., & Looi, C.-K. (2012). Agent prompts: scaffolding for productive reflection in an intelligent learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 339–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarrow, F., & Topping, K. J. (2001). Collaborative writing: the effects of metacognitive prompting and structured peer interaction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 261–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study presented here is part of a series of activities of the Swiss “Technologies for Vocational Training” Leading House funded by the State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI) within the Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (EAER) [BB.2009.0175]. We would thank Claudia Sassi and all the trainers at the Società Impiegati di Commercio (SIC Ticino) whose support was fundamental for this experience; Elisa Motta, Luca Bausch, Carlo Tomasetto for their precious contribution and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Boldrini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boldrini, E., Cattaneo, A. Scaffolding Collaborative Reflective Writing in a VET Curriculum. Vocations and Learning 7, 145–165 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-014-9110-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-014-9110-3

Keywords

Navigation