Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Meanings and Problems of Contemporary Creative Work

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Vocations and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contemporary creative work has emerged as a focus of international academic and policy attention since the late 1990s, the period in which the cultural and creative industries achieved recognition as a highly successful new sector. Commentators have noted the problems faced by many contemporary creative workers because of the precarious and ill-paid nature of much of the work in the sector. This article proposes that associations with the creative arts provide an important resource for the occupational identification for these workers, yet also a significant source of conflicts. Analyses of interviews with creative workers who were recruited from the students and alumni of UK art colleges (Higher Education Institutions in Arts and Design) suggest that meanings derived from the creative arts and taken up in educational contexts and elsewhere continue to shape these workers’ understandings of creative work, including the process of creative working, the trajectory of a creative career, and what constitutes success in creative work. The importance of these meanings is explored and detailed through a consideration of participants’ identifications using a narrative-discursive analysis of interview data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The ‘cultural industries’ came to be of interest as producers of culture, including national culture, for example, through media like television (O’Connor 2007). ‘Creative industries’ is a newer term combining ‘cultural industries’ and ‘creative arts’ (Hartley 2005, p.6). The concept of the creative industries was originally introduced in the UK (DCMS 2001) but has subsequently been taken up in other national contexts, with varying emphases and definitions (see Keane 2009; Power 2009).

  2. Other details of the transcription are as follows:

    (Laughter) indicates laughter by speaker

    … indicates that words have been omitted from the transcript

    [he] indicates a word added to increase readability

    Italics indicates a word emphasised by the speaker

  3. The non-linear career trajectory which the participants claimed for themselves corresponds to the portfolio or ‘protean’ career (Bridgstock 2005) described by some researchers as a feature of contemporary working lives in certain areas. My interest in this article is in participants’ own accounts and the possible functions of these accounts.

References

  • Banks, M. (2007). The politics of cultural work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, M., & Hesmondhalgh, D. (2009). Looking for work in creative industries policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 15(4), 415–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, M., & O'Connor, J. (2009). Introduction: after the creative industries. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 15(4), 365–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1982). Art worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1999). Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse & Society, 10(4), 543–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgstock, R. S. (2005). Australian artists, starving and well-nourished: what can we learn from the prototypical protean career? Australian Journal of Career Development, 14(3), 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgstock, R. S. (2009). The graduate attributes we’ve overlooked: enhancing graduate employability through career management skills. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkitt, I. (2008). Social Selves: Theories of self and society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creative and Cultural Skills. (2011). Sector Qualifications Strategy for the creative and cultural industries. http://www.ccskills.org.uk/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=NKELTZ%2bhsbA%3d&tabid=135. Accessed 3 June 2011.

  • Department of Culture, Media and Sport. (2001). Creative Industries Mapping Document. Media and Sport Department for Culture: HMSO.

  • Edley, N. (2001). Analysing Masculinity: Interpretative repertoires, subject positions and ideological dilemmas. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edley, N., & Wetherell, M. (1995). Men in perspective: Practice, power and identity. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall/ Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A. (2007). London’s creative sector. London: GLA Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. (2007). Technobohemians or the new Cybertariat? New media workers in Amsterdam a decade after the Web. The Institute of Network Cultures.

  • Gill, R., & Pratt, A. (2008). In the social factory? Immaterial labour, precariousness and cultural work. Theory Culture & Society, 25(7–8), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guile, D. (2006). Access, learning and development in the creative and cultural sectors: from ‘creative apprenticeship’ to ‘being apprenticed’. Journal of Education and Work, 19(5), 433–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. (2005). Creative industries. In J. Hartley (Ed.), Creative industries. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howkins, J. (2001). The creative economy: How people make money from ideas. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, M. (2009). Creative Industries in China: four perspectives on social transformation. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 15(4), 431–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leadbetter, C. (2004). Britain’s creativity challenge. London: Creative and Cultural Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, A. (1998). British fashion design: Rag trade or image industry? London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miell, D., & Littleton, K. (2004). Collaborative creativity. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, J. (2007). The cultural and creative industries: a review of the literature. In creative partnerships. London: Arts Council England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, K. (2007). Better than working for a living? Skills and labour in the festivals economy. London: Celebrating Enterprise.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, K., Sperry, B., & Pratt, A. (2008). The art of innovation: How fine art graduates contribute to innovation. London: NESTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, E., Connor, H., & Hunt, W. (2008). Mapping provision and participation in postgraduate creative arts and design. London: National Arts Learning Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, D. (2009). Culture, creativity and experience in Nordic and Scandinavian cultural policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 15(4), 445–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J., & Taylor, S. (2005). Narrating singleness: Life stories and deficit identities. Narrative Inquiry, 15(2), 197–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J., Wetherell, M., & Taylor, S. (2007). Choice and chance: negotiating agency in narratives of singleness. The Sociological Review, 55(2), 331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1989). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1996). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power and personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, K. (2003). Group creativity: Music, theatre, collaboration. Mahwah: Earlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. (2006). Narrative as construction and discursive resource. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 94–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. (2010). Narratives of identity and place. London: Routledge / Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., & Littleton, K. (2005). Diversity and inclusion in the RCA: a report based on the ‘Creative journeys’ project.

  • Taylor, S., & Littleton, K. (2006). Biographies in talk: A narrativediscursive research approach. Qualitative Sociology Review. II(1). http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume3/QSR_2_1_Taylor_Littleton

  • Taylor, S., & Littleton, K. (2008a). Art work or money: Conflicts in the construction of a creative identity. The Sociological Review, 56(2), 275–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., & Littleton, K. (2008b). Creative Careers and Non-Traditional Trajectories. London: National Arts Learning Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9(3), 387–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. C. & White, C. A. (1965/1993). Canvases and careers: Institutional change in the french painting world. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie Taylor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, S. The Meanings and Problems of Contemporary Creative Work. Vocations and Learning 5, 41–57 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-011-9065-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-011-9065-6

Keywords

Navigation