Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The EC Discourse on Vocational Training: How a ‘Common Vocational Training Policy’ Turned into a Lifelong Learning Strategy

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Vocations and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article traces the EC vocational training policy historically and describes the discursive alignments which brought the policy from a ‘common vocational training policy’ as laid down in Article 128, in the Treaty of Rome to the Lisbon Lifelong Learning strategy. The argument is that vocational training has served as a lever for the gradual expansion of the policy field into both general and higher education and for the establishment of a European discourse on Lifelong Learning. In the article, Ball’s concept of “policy as discourse” is used to identify the changing spaces of possibility within EC vocational training policy (Ball, What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse, 13(2), 1993).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The open method of coordination is in most EU studies described as “soft law”, i.e., the method does not establish the binding law of the community method which has to be implemented at national level. Like the programme method, it creates networks of individuals and institutions exchanging ideas and developing similar practices. But in addition, the open method involves national governments in creating and diffusing a EU framework of policies and practices on a topic area over which, they, officially, retain sovereignty. This works through the establishment of common policy objectives, benchmarks and indicators and through continuous evaluation by peers, and monitoring by the Commission through reviewing of policies and action plans in each country in annual or bi-annual reports (Cort 2008a).

  2. In the article, I use the term “vocational training” hereby reflecting the legal basis for implementing a common vocational training policy as stated in Article 128 of the Treaty of Rome. It is not until the adoption of the Maastricht Treaty in 1992 that the term “vocational education and training” starts being more widely used in EC policy documents. The different EC usage of the terms reflects the fact that the community is Treaty-based and that wording has to be carefully considered in order not to overstep the EC legal jurisdiction.

  3. By “technologies of Europeanisation”, I mean the modes of governance or policy instruments which lead to changes in national policies along the lines of European policy objectives or European models, such as the European Qualification Framework or the European Lifelong Learning model. This definition is partly based on the Vink, who defines Europeanisation pragmatically as “when something in the domestic political system is affected by something European” (Vink 2002, p. 3).

  4. Andersen and Kjær (1996) introduce the concept of “space of possibility” by drawing on Foucault’s concept of “conditions of possibility”, which make certain ways of thinking and acting possible and exclude others (see Foucault 2005). I find their concept very interesting as it opens up for a spatiality of actions but also for counteractions, e.g., drawing on other discourses within this space.

  5. It is inspired by the approach developed by Andersen and Kjær (1996), institutional history. They promote an analytical strategy consisting of two steps: 1) a diachronic analysis focusing on how a specific institution is constructed over time; and 2) a synchronic analysis focusing on changes/rupture that re-configure a specific institution. In this article, I apply the diachronic perspective. (For a synchronic perspective please see Cort 2008b).

  6. EC policies adopted within the field of vocational training in general belong to the lower echelon of the EC judicial hierarchy, i.e. recommendations and decisions.

  7. Gillingham points to the fact that the Treaty of Rome is highly influenced by ordo-liberal ideas of the market as the main mechanism for regulating the economy. He sees the Single European Act as a return to these ordo-liberal ideas, but points to a perpetual schism within the Community between the ideas of the European Community as a new “superstate” or as a new market economy consisting of 27 Member States. In the early 1960s, there was a wish within the Commission to establish a federal state and this led to conflicts with the Member States, especially France.

  8. In the Treaty of Rome, vocational training is mentioned in several of the Articles (see e.g. Article 41 on a Common Agricultural Policy, Article 57 on the mutual recognition of diplomas, and Article 118 on social policy within the community).

  9. This dichotomy of Commission versus Member States and the issue of retaining or pooling sovereignty is a common theme in many articles dealing with the European Community. However, as pointed out by many EU researchers EC politics is a complex process in which both the Member States influence EC policies and EC policies have a direct impact on national policies (see e.g. Howarth and Torfing 2005; Kohler-Koch and Eising 1999).

  10. For researchers interested only in education, this is often regarded as the starting point for a common education policy in the European Communities and Neave notes that “[the Janne report] was a noteworthy contribution to breaking down the taboo which, hitherto, had been set around the area of education in community affairs” (Neave 1984, p. 8).

  11. Ralf Dahrendorf was the German Commissioner of the first Directorate-General for Research, Science and Education from 1970 to 1974.

  12. In his report, Janne also warns against the extreme outcome of à la carte system where learners can choose freely: ”inevitably, the industrial enterprise would seek to train workers, employees and supervisory staff according to its own needs and would organise promotion in such a way as to fit in with its own criteria for technical and managerial skills. The abolition of the legal value of degrees and diplomas, the institutionalisation of systems providing completely free options […] might culminate in the emergence of a meritocracy regulated by the interest of private enterprise’ (Janne 1973, p. 43). Now more than 30 years later, it might be worth remembering this far-sighted warning by Janne.

  13. 30 years later the unease seems to have disappeared as the terms of “a European VET area” and a “European education and training space” are generally accepted, even in national policy papers.

  14. The central issue of the case was the payment of a fee for attending a course in the art of strip cartoon at the Academie Royale des Beaux Arts in Liège. A French student, Gravier, objected to paying the fee as it was only to be paid by non-Belgian students. The European Court of Justice ruled that “(2) the term “vocational training” includes courses in strip cartoon art provided by an institution of higher art education where that institution prepares students for a qualification for a particular profession, trade or employment or provides them with the skills necessary for such a profession, trade or employment”.(“Francoise Gravier v City of Liège” 1985).

References

  • Andersen, N. A., & Kjær, P. (1996). Institutional Construction and Change: An Analytical Strategy of Institutional History (Vol. 5). København: Center for offentlig organisation og styring.

  • Ball, S. J. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse, 13(2). doi:10.1080/0159630930130203.

  • Brine, J. (2006). Lifelong learning and the knowledge economy: those that know and those that do not—the discourse of the European Union. British Educational Research Journal, 32(5), 649–665. doi:10.1080/01411920600895676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L., & Pedersen, O. K. (Eds.). (2001). The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis. Princeton University Press.

  • Commission Working Paper.Guidelines for Community Action in the Field of Education and Training. (1993). (Vol. COM(93) 183 final): Commission of the European Communities.

  • Cort, P. (2008a). The open method of coordination—a triangle of EU governance? The Danish School of Education.

  • Cort, P. (2008b). Transcending the nation state—Towards a European Vocational Education and Training Model? Cursiv, 3.

  • Council Decision of 2 April 1963 laying down general principles for implementing a common vocational training policy. (1963). (Vol. 63/266/EEC, pp. 25–28): Official Journal of the European Communities.

  • Dahrendorf, R. (1973). Working Program in the Field of “Research, Science and Education” (Vol. SEC(73) 2000/2): Commission of the European Communities.

  • de Moor, A. (1985). Article 7 of the Treaty of Rome Bites. The Modern Law Review, 48(4), 452–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deane, C. (2005). Transparency of Qualifications: are we there yet? European Journal of Education, 40(3), 279–293. doi:10.1111/j.1465-3435.2005.00226.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogg, K., & Jones, H. C. (1985). Educating the European Community: Ten Years on: Changing Issues in Education. European Journal of Education, 20(2/3), 293–300. doi:10.2307/1502956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2005) Vidensarkælogien. Forlaget Philosophia.

  • Francoise Gravier v City of Liège, Non-discrimination—Access to vocational training (Court of Justice of the European Communities. (1985).

  • From education to working life. (1976). (Supplement 12): Commission of the European Communities.

  • General guidelines for drawing up a Community action programme on vocational training. (1971). (Vol. C 081, 12/08/1971, pp. 5–11): The European Commission.

  • Gewirtz, S., & Ball, S. J. (2000). From “Welfarism” to “New Managerialism”: shifting discourses of shcool headship in the education marketplace. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21(3), 253–268. doi:10.1080/713661162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham, J. (2003). European Integration 19502003 (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, D., & Torfing, J. (Eds.). (2005). Discourse Theory in European Politics: palgrave macmillan.

  • Janne, H. (1973). For a Community policy on education. In The European Commission (Ed.) (Vol. 10, pp. 60): The European Commission.

  • Kohler-Koch, B., & Eising, R. (Eds.). (1999). The Tranformation of Governance in the European Union (Vol. 12). London: Routledge.

  • Lawn, M. (2003). The “Usefulness” of Learning: the struggle over governance, meaning and the European education space. University of Edinburgh.

  • Mechi, L. (2004). Vocational training from the birth of the ECSC to the early years of the EEC. In A. Varsori (Ed.), Towards a history of vocational education and training (VET) in Europe in a comparative perspective (vol. II, (p. 12–23)). Florence: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Memorandum on the Rationalisation and Coordination of Vocational Training Programmes at Community Level. (1990). (Vol. COM(90) 334 final): The Commission of the European Communities.

  • Moodie, G. (2002). Identifying vocational education and training. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 54(2), 249–266. doi:10.1080/13636820200200197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (1984). The EEC and education: Trentham Books.

  • Nielsen, S. P. (1993). EF's sammenlignelighedsprojekt og erhvervsuddannelserne. København: Statens Erhvervspædagogiske Læreruddannelse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, S. P., Cort, P., & Pedersen, F. (1999). Evaluation of the Leonardo Programme. Denmark. Copenhagen: The Danish Institute for Educational Training of Vocational Teachers.

    Google Scholar 

  • On the comparability of vocational training qualifications between the Member States of the European Community. (1985). (Vol. 85/368/EEC): European Economic Community.

  • Petrini, F. (2004). The common vocational training policy in the EEC from 1961 to 1972. In A. Varsori (Ed.), Towards a history of vocational education and training (VET) in Europe in a comparative perspective(vol. 101). Thessaloniki: Cedefop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Project Memorandum sur les Problèmes relatifs à la Formation Professionnelle des Travilleurs des Industries de la Communauté. (1957). In H. Autorité (Ed.) (Vol. 2894/57): Communauté Europeenne du Charbon et de l’Acier.

  • Treaty of Rome. (1957).

  • Treaty on European Union. (1992). Official Journal, C, 191.

  • Vink, M. (2002). What is Europeanization? and Other Questions on a New Research Agenda, Yen Research Meeting on Europeanisation. Milan: Department of Science, Ledien University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkenhorst, H. (2005). The German Education System and Europeanisation: From “Golden Rein” to Last Resort? Manchester: ASGP Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, W., & Haahr, J. H. (2005). Governing Europe. Discourse, governmentality and European integration. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • White Paper on Education and Training.Teaching and Learning—Towards the Learning Society. (1995). (Vol. COM(95) 590 final): Commission of the European Communities.

List of policy documents

  • Commission Memorandum on Vocational Training in the European Community in the 1990s. (1991). (Vol. COM(91) 397 final): Commission of the European Communities.

  • Commission Report on the Establishment of a European Foundation. (1977). (Vol. 5): European Communities-Commission.

  • Communication from the Commission: Review of the Reactions to the White Paper: “Teaching and Learning: Towards the Learning Society”. (1997). (Vol. COM(97) 256 final): Commission of the European Communities.

  • Conclusions of the Council and the ministers for education meeting within the Council of 14 December 1989 on technical and vocational education and initial training. (1990). (Vol. C 027, pp. 4–6): Official Journal.

  • The Copenhagen Declaration. (2002).

  • Council Conclusions of 24 July 1995 on the importance and implications of the quality of vocational training. (1995). (Vol. 31995Y0812(03), pp. 7–8): Official Journal C 207.

  • Council Decision of 18 December 1989 establishing an action programme to promote innovation in the field of vocational training resulting from technological change in the European Community (Eurotecnet). (1989). (Vol. 89/657/EEC): The European Community.

  • Council Regulation (EEC) No 1360/90 of 7 May 1990 establishing a European Training Foundation. (1990). (Vol. 1360/90): EU Commission.

  • Council Resolution of 5 June 1989 on continuing vocational training. (1989). (Vol. 31989Y0615(01), pp. 4): Official Journal C 148.

  • Council resolution of 11 July 1983 concerning vocational training policies in the European Community in the 1980s. (1983). (Vol. 31983Y0720(02), pp. 6): Official Journal C193, 20/07/1983, p. 2.

  • Council Resolution of 15 July 1996 on the transparency of vocational training certificates. (1996). (Vol. 31996Y0801(04), pp. 7–8): Official Journal C 224.

  • Council Resolution of 18 December 1990 on the comparability of vocational training qualifications. (1990). (Vol. 31991Y0424(01), pp. 1–2): Official Journal C 109, 24/04/1991.

  • Detailed work programme on the follow-up of the objectives of Education and training systems in Europe. (2002). (Vol. C 142): Official Journal of the European Communites.

  • Education and training in Europe: diverse systems, shared goals for 2010. (2002): European Commission.

  • Education and vocational training within the European Community. Activities of the Commission of the European Communities in 1983 and 1984. (1985). (Final ed.): Commission of the European Communities.

  • Education in the European Community. (1974). (Vol. 3): The European Commission.

  • Education in the European Community—Medium-term perspectives 1989–1992. (1988). (Vol. COM(88) 280 final): Commission of the European Communities.

  • European Governance—A White paper. (2001). Commission of European Communities.

  • Interim Report on the implementation of the Council Decision of 1 December 1987 concerning an Action Programme for the vocational training of Young People and their Preparation for Adult and Working Life (PETRA Programme). (1990). (Vol. SEC(90) 432 final): Commission of the European Communities.

  • Making a European Area of Lifelong Learning a Reality. (2001): The European Commission.

  • New Information Technologies and Social Change in the areas of employment, working conditions, education and vocational training. Communication of the Commission to the Standing Committee on Employment. (1981). The Commussion of the European Communities.

  • Newsletter on the Common Agricultural Policy. (1966). (Vol. 3): Directorate General for Agriculture of the EEC Commission.

  • Presidency Conclusions: Lisbon European Council 23 and 24 March 2000. (2000). European Commission.

  • Report from Education Council to the European Council on the Concrete Future Objectives of Education and Training Systems. (2001). The Council of the European Union.

  • Towards a Europe of Knowledge. (1997). (Vol. COM(97) 563 final): Commission of the European Communities.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pia Cort.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cort, P. The EC Discourse on Vocational Training: How a ‘Common Vocational Training Policy’ Turned into a Lifelong Learning Strategy. Vocations and Learning 2, 87–107 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-008-9019-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-008-9019-9

Keywords

Navigation