Skip to main content
Log in

Update on risk stratification and treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

  • Progress in Hematology
  • Understanding the pathogenesis and the evolving treatment paradigm for multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents
  • Published:
International Journal of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multiple myeloma is the second most common hematologic malignancy. Chromosomal aberrations are important prognostic determinants that influence the clinical decision-making in newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Patients are considered high-risk if any of the following features are detected: hypodiploidy, deletion 13 by cytogenetics, t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20) and/or 17 p deletion. In the absence of these features patients are considered standard risk. Outside of trials, risk-adapted therapy in the transplant-eligible high-risk patients advocates use of bortezomib-based induction therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and bortezomib-based maintenance therapy. High-risk, transplant-ineligible patients should also utilize bortezomib as initial therapy since it is known to overcome the poor prognosis associated with some high-risk features. The goal of therapy in high-risk patients is to attain and maintain a state of complete remission as much as possible. In contrast, the standard-risk, transplant-eligible patients may be treated with either lenalidomide–dexamethasone or bortezomib-based therapy followed by ASCT. In such patients, ASCT can also be deferred until first relapse if the patients are tolerating initial therapy well. Lenalidomide maintenance therapy in the post-transplant setting in standard-risk patients is controversial and not recommended routinely. For transplant-ineligible standard-risk patients, multiple options exist, although in the absence direct comparisons, we prefer lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone over melphalan-based combinations. This review outlines evidence-based management approaches in NDMM, with a focus on risk-adapted therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rajkumar SV. Treatment of multiple myeloma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8(8):479–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Russell SJ, Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma and the road to personalised medicine. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(7):617–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rajkumar SV, et al. Serum free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Blood. 2005;106(3):812–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kyle RA, et al. Clinical course and prognosis of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(25):2582–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kapoor P, et al. Evidence for cytogenetic and fluorescence in situ hybridization risk stratification of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the era of novel therapie. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(6):532–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kapoor P, et al. Efficacy of thalidomide- or lenalidomide-based therapy in proliferative multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2011;25(7):1195–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Greipp PR, et al. International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(15):3412–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barlogie B, Crowley J. Could CR mean cure? Blood. 2011;118(3):483.

  9. Fonseca R, et al. International Myeloma Working Group molecular classification of multiple myeloma: spotlight review. Leukemia. 2009;23(12):2210–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar SK, et al. Management of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma: updated Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) consensus guidelines. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84(12):1095–110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Moreau P, et al. Heterogeneity of t(4;14) in multiple myeloma. Long-term follow-up of 100 cases treated with tandem transplantation in IFM99 trials. Leukemia. 2007;21(9):2020–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Barlogie B, et al. Sustained complete remissions in multiple myeloma linked to bortezomib in total therapy 3: comparison with total therapy 2. Br J Haematol. 2008;140(6):625–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. San Miguel JF, et al. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(9):906–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lane DP. Cancer. p53, guardian of the genome. Nature. 1992;358(6381):15–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Avet-Loiseau H, et al. Genetic abnormalities and survival in multiple myeloma: the experience of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome. Blood. 2007;109(8):3489–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shaughnessy J Jr, et al. Prognostic impact of cytogenetic and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization-defined chromosome 13 deletion in multiple myeloma: early results of total therapy II. Br J Haematol. 2003;120(1):44–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhan F, et al. The molecular classification of multiple myeloma. Blood. 2006;108(6):2020–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Decaux O, et al. Prediction of survival in multiple myeloma based on gene expression profiles reveals cell cycle and chromosomal instability signatures in high-risk patients and hyperdiploid signatures in low-risk patients: a study of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(29):4798–805.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Avet-Loiseau H, et al. Prognostic significance of copy-number alterations in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(27):4585–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kumar SK, et al. Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood. 2008;111(5):2516–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Rajkumar SV, Gahrton G, Bergsagel PL. Approach to the treatment of multiple myeloma: a clash of philosophies. Blood. 2011;118:3205–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kapoor P, et al. Impact of risk stratification on outcome among patients with multiple myeloma receiving initial therapy with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. Blood. 2009;114(3):518–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Moreau P, et al. Bortezomib plus dexamethasone versus reduced-dose bortezomib, thalidomide plus dexamethasone as induction treatment prior to autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood. 2011.

  24. Reeder CB, et al. Cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone induction for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: high response rates in a phase II clinical trial. Leukemia. 2009;23(7):1337–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Fermand JP, et al. High-dose therapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: up-front or rescue treatment? Results of a multicenter sequential randomized clinical trial. Blood. 1998;92(9):3131–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Palumbo A, et al. Secondary malignancies in elderly myeloma patients (Abstract). Haematologica. 2011;96(s1).

  27. Attal M, et al. Maintenance therapy with thalidomide improves survival in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2006;108(10):3289–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Spencer A, et al. Consolidation therapy with low-dose thalidomide and prednisolone prolongs the survival of multiple myeloma patients undergoing a single autologous stem-cell transplantation procedure. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(11):1788–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kapoor P, et al. Melphalan and prednisone versus melphalan, prednisone and thalidomide for elderly and/or transplant ineligible patients with multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis. Leukemia. 2011;25(4):689–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fayers PM, et al. Thalidomide for previously untreated elderly patients with multiple myeloma: meta-analysis of 1685 individual patient data from 6 randomized clinical trials. Blood. 2011;118(5):1239–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Palumbo A, et al. Bortezomib–melphalan–prednisone–thalidomide followed by maintenance with bortezomib-thalidomide compared with bortezomib–melphalan–prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(34):5101–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mateos MV, et al. Bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone versus bortezomib, thalidomide, and prednisone as induction therapy followed by maintenance treatment with bortezomib and thalidomide versus bortezomib and prednisone in elderly patients with untreated multiple myeloma: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(10):934–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Moreau P, et al. Subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of bortezomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority study. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(5):431–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rajkumar SV, Jacobus S, Callander NS. Lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone versus lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(1):14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cavo M, et al. Bortezomib (Velcade®)–thalidomide–dexamethasone (VTD) vs thalidomide–dexamethasone (TD) in preparation for autologous stem-cell (SC) transplantation (ASCT) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Blood. 2007;110:Abstract 73 (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts).

  36. Rosinol, LL, et al. A phase III PETHEMA/GEM study of induction therapy prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma: superiority of VTD (bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone) over TD and VBMCP/VBAD plus bortezomib. Blood.2010;116:Abstract 307 (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts).

  37. Harousseau JL, et al. Bortezomib plus dexamethasone is superior to vincristine plus doxorubicin plus dexamethasone as induction treatment prior to autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of the IFM 2005–01 phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(30):4621–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Macro M, Divine M, et al. Dexamethasone+thalidomide (Dex/Thal) compared to VAD as a pre-transplant treatment in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM): a randomized trial. 2006;108(11):57 (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts).

  39. Lokhorst HM, et al. A randomized phase 3 study on the effect of thalidomide combined with adriamycin, dexamethasone, and high-dose melphalan, followed by thalidomide maintenance in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2010;115(6):1113–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Barlogie B, et al. Thalidomide arm of Total Therapy 2 improves complete remission duration and survival in myeloma patients with metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities. Blood. 2008;112(8):3115–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Stewart AK, et al. A randomized phase III trial of thalidomide and prednisone as maintenance therapy following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM): the NCIC CTG MY.10 Trial. Blood. 2010;116:Abstract 39 (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts).

  42. Morgan GJ, et al. Thalidomide Maintenance significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of myeloma patients when effective relapse treatments are used: MRC myeloma IX results. Blood. 2010;116:623 (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ludwig H, et al. Thalidomide maintenance treatment increases progression-free but not overall survival in elderly patients with myeloma. Haematologica. 2010;95(9):1548–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Attal M, et al. Maintenance treatment with lenalidomide after transplantation for myeloma: analysis of secondary malignancies within the IFM 2005-02 trial (Abstract). Haematologica. 2011;96(s1):S23.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mccarthy P, et al. PHASE phase III intergroup study of lenalidomide versus placebo maintenance therapy following single autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM) CALGB ECOG BMT-CTN 100104 (Abstract). Haematologica. 2011;96(s1):S23.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sonneveld P, et al. HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 randomized phase III trial comparing bortezomib, doxorubicin, dexamethasone (PAD) vs VAD followed by high-dose melphalan (HDM) and maintenance with bortezomib or thalidomide in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Blood;116:40 (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts).

  47. Niesvizky R, et al. Phase 3b UPFRONT Study: safety and efficacy of weekly bortezomib maintenance therapy after bortezomib-based induction regimens in elderly, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Blood. 2010;116:Abstract 619 (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts).

  48. Palumbo A, et al. Oral melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: updated results of a randomized controlled trial. Blood. 2008;112(8):3107–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Facon T, et al. Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide versus melphalan and prednisone alone or reduced-intensity autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma (IFM 99-06): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2007;370(9594):1209–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hulin C, et al. Efficacy of melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide in patients older than 75 years with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: IFM 01/01 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(22):3664–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Waage A, et al. Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide or placebo in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2010;116(9):1405–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Wijermans P, et al. Phase III study of the value of thalidomide added to melphalan plus prednisone in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the HOVON 49 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(19):3160–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Vincent Rajkumar.

About this article

Cite this article

Kapoor, P., Rajkumar, S.V. Update on risk stratification and treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Int J Hematol 94, 310–320 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-011-0947-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-011-0947-z

Keywords

Navigation