Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Kriterien der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung e. V. für „Brustschmerz-Ambulanzen“

Update 2016

Criteria of the German Cardiac Society for “Chest Pain Units”

Update 2016

  • Konsensuspapier
  • Published:
Der Kardiologe Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Perings S et al (2010) Konsensuspapier der Task Force „Brustschmerz-Ambulanz“ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung. Kardiologe 4(3):208–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kligfield P et al (2007) Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part I: the electrocardiogram and its technology a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(10):1109–1127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bassand JP et al (2007) Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 28(13):1598–1660

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Van de Werf F et al (2008) Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 29(23):2909–2945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson JL et al (2007) ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction): developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons: endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Circulation 116(7):e148–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruigomez A et al (2006) Chest pain in general practice: incidence, comorbidity and mortality. Fam Pract 23(2):167–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ruigomez A et al (2009) Chest pain without established ischaemic heart disease in primary care patients: associated comorbidities and mortality. Br J Gen Pract 59(560):e78–86

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Dietz R, Rauch B (2003) Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of chronic coronary heart disease. Issued by the executive committee of the German Society of Cardiology – Heart Circulation Research in cooperation with the German Society for Prevention and Rehabilitation of Cardiac Diseases and the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Z Kardiol 92(6):501–521

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mason JW et al (2007) Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part II: electrocardiography diagnostic statement list a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(10):1128–1135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Breuckmann F et al (2008) Kriterien der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung für „Chest-Pain-Units“. Kardiologe 2(5):389–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Surawicz B et al (2009) AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part III: intraventricular conduction disturbances: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 53(11):976–981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rautaharju PM et al (2009) AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part IV: the ST segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 53(11):982–991

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hancock EW et al (2009) AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part V: electrocardiogram changes associated with cardiac chamber hypertrophy: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 53(11):992–1002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wagner GS et al (2009) AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part VI: acute ischemia/infarction: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 53(11):1003–1011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Muller-Bardorff M et al (1999) Quantitative bedside assay for cardiac troponin T: a complementary method to centralized laboratory testing. Clin Chem 45(7):1002–1008

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Apple FS (2009) A new season for cardiac troponin assays: it’s time to keep a scorecard. Clin Chem 55(7):1303–1306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Douglas PS et al (2007) ACCF/ASE/ACEP/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2007 appropriateness criteria for transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American Society of Echocardiography, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians and the Society of Critical Care Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 50(2):187–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Epstein AE et al (2008) ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices) developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 51(21):e1–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Trappe HJ, Lollgen H (2000) Guidelines for ergometry. German Society of Cardiology – Heart and Cardiovascular Research. Z Kardiol 89(9):821–831

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Douglas PS et al (2008) ACCF/ASE/ACEP/AHA/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2008 appropriateness criteria for stress echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society and the Society of Critical Care Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 51(11):1127–1147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bandoh T et al (2000) Fluvastatin suppresses atherosclerotic progression, mediated through its inhibitory effect on endothelial dysfunction, lipid peroxidation, and macrophage deposition. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 35(1):136–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hendel RC et al (2006) ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 48(7):1475–1497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Roffi M et al (2015) ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2015. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320

    Google Scholar 

  24. Than M et al (2011) A 2‑h diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms in the Asia-Pacific region (ASPECT): a prospective observational validation study. Lancet 377(9771):1077–1084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hamm CW (2004) Guidelines: acute coronary syndrome (ACS). 1: ACS without persistent ST segment elevations. Z Kardiol 93(1):72–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vafaie M et al (2015) Addition of copeptin improves diagnostic performance of point-of-care testing (POCT) for cardiac troponin T in early rule-out of myocardial infarction – A pilot study. Int J Cardiol 198:26–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Scheike M, Nilsson S, Nylander E (2007) Exercise testing and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in primary care patients with chest pain of new onset. Scand J Prim Health Care 25(2):117–122

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Siebens K et al (2007) The role of nurses in a chest pain unit. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 6(4):265–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CardioCentrum Düsseldorf, Königsallee 61, 40215, Düsseldorf, Deutschland

    S. Perings

  2. Kardiologische Praxis, Kirchheim-Teck, Deutschland

    N. Smetak

  3. Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie und Pneumologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland

    S. Perings & M. Kelm

  4. Ambulantes Kardiologisches Zentrum, Peine, Deutschland

    U. Gremmler & H. Darius

  5. Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Deutschland

    J. Senges

  6. Klinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland

    T. Münzel

  7. Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie und Pneumologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland

    E. Giannitsis & H. Katus

Authors
  1. S. Perings
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. Smetak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Kelm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. U. Gremmler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. H. Darius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. Senges
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. T. Münzel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. E. Giannitsis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. H. Katus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Perings.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

Den Interessenkonflikt der Autoren finden Sie online auf der DGK-Homepage unter http://leitlinien.dgk.org/ bei der entsprechenden Publikation.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perings, S., Smetak, N., Kelm, M. et al. Kriterien der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung e. V. für „Brustschmerz-Ambulanzen“. Kardiologe 10, 301–306 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12181-016-0074-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12181-016-0074-4

Search

Navigation