Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

ACL Return to Sport Guidelines and Criteria

  • ACL Rehab (T Sgroi and J Molony, section editors)
  • Published:
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Because of the epidemiological incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, the high reinjury rates that occur when returning back to sports, the actual number of patients that return to the same premorbid level of competition, the high incidence of osteoarthritis at 5–10-year follow-ups, and the effects on the long-term health of the knee and the quality of life for the patient, individualizing the return to sports after ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) is critical. However, one of the challenging but unsolved dilemmas is what criteria and clinical decision making should be used to return an athlete back to sports following an ACL-R. This article describes an example of a functional testing algorithm (FTA) as one method for clinical decision making based on quantitative and qualitative testing and assessment utilized to make informed decisions to return an athlete to their sports safely and without compromised performance. The methods were a review of the best current evidence to support a FTA.

Recent Findings

In order to evaluate all the complicated domains of the clinical decision making for individualizing the return to sports after ACL-R, numerous assessments need to be performed including the biopsychosocial concepts, impairment testing, strength and power testing, functional testing, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

Summary

The optimum criteria to use for individualizing the return to sports after ACL-R remain elusive. However, since this decision needs to be made on a regular basis with the safety and performance factors of the patient involved, this FTA provides one method of quantitatively and qualitatively making the decisions. Admittedly, there is no predictive validity of this system, but it does provide practical guidelines to facilitate the clinical decision making process for return to sports. The clinical decision to return an athlete back into competition has significant implications ranging from the safety of the athlete, to performance factors and actual litigation issues. By using a multifactorial FTA, such as the one described, provides quantitative and qualitatively criteria to make an informed decision in the best interests of the athlete.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Sugimoto D, LeBlanc JC, Wooley SE, et al. The effectiveness of a functional knee brace on joint-position sense in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed individuals. J Sport Rehabil. 2016;25(2):190–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Heard BJ, Solbak NM, Achari Y, et al. Changes of early post-traumatic osteoarthritis in an ovine model of simulated ACL reconstruction are associated with transient acute post-injury synovial inflammation and tissue catabolism. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2013;21(12):1942–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. • Risberg MA, Oiestad BE, Gunderson R, et al. Changes in knee osteoarthritis, symptoms, and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 20-year prospective follow-up study. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(5):1215–24. This Level of evidence 2 cohort study examined the progression on knee OA changes and changes in symptoms and function in isolated and combined injuries from 15 to 20 years after ACLR. A total of 210 subjects with ACLR were prospectively followed. At the 15- and 20-year follow-ups, radiographs were obtained and classified by the Kellgren and Lawrence (K-L) grading system. Symptoms and function were evaluated with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) as well as isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength tests. There were 168 subjects (80%) who returned for the 20-year follow-up, with a mean (±SD) age of 45 ± 9 years, mean body mass index of 27 ± 4, and median Tegner activity level of 4 (range, 0–9). The prevalence of radiographic TF and PF OA at the 20-year follow-up was 42 and 21%, respectively. Patients with ACL injuries and other combined injuries had significantly higher prevalence of radiographic TF OA compared with those who had isolated ACL injury ( P < .0001). A significant deterioration in knee symptoms and function was observed on the KOOS subscales ( P ≤ .01), with the exception of quality of life ( P = .14), as well as a decrease in quadriceps muscle strength and hamstring muscle strength ( P < .0001).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kamath GV, Murphy T, Creighton RA, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament injury, return to play, and reinjury in the elite collegiate athlete: analysis of an NCAA Division I cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(7):1638–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, et al. Return-to-sport outcomes at 2 to 7 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(1):41–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. • Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR. Factors used to determine return to unrestricted sports activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(12):1697–705. This is a Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies. The rates of either reinjuring an ACL-reconstructed knee or sustaining an ACL rupture to the contralateral knee range from 3 to 49%. reconstruction. Two hundred and 64 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 105 (40%) failed to provide any criteria for return to sports after ACL reconstruction. In 84 studies (32%) the amount of time postoperatively was the only criterion provided. In 40 studies (15%) the amount of time along with subjective criteria were given. Only 35 studies (13%) noted objective criteria required for return to athletics. These criteria included muscle strength or thigh circumference (28 studies), general knee examination (15 studies), single-leg hop tests (10 studies), Lachman rating (1 study), and validated questionnaires (1 study).The results of this systematic review show noteworthy problems and a lack of objective assessment before release to unrestricted sports activities.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reiman MP, Manske RC. The assessment of function: how is it measured? A clinical perspective. J Man Manip Ther. 2011;19(2):91–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Reiman MP, Manske RC. The assessment of function. Part II: clinical perspective of a javelin thrower with low back and groin pain. J Man Manip Ther. 2012;20(2):83–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Manske RC, Reiman M. Functional performance testing for power and return to sports. Sports Health. 2013;5:244–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Morris RC, Hulstyn MJ, Fleming BC, et al. Return to play following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med. 2016;35(4):655–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. van Melick N, van Cingel RE, Brooijmans F, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice update: practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus. Br J Sports Med. 2016;24:1506–1515.

  12. Gokeler A, Welling W, Zaffagnini S, et al. Development of a test battery to enhance safe return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(1):192–199.

  13. • Kyritsis P, Bahr R, Landreau P, et al. Likelihood of ACL graft rupture: not meeting six clinical discharge criteria before return to sport is associated with a four times greater risk of rupture. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(15):946–51. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a set of objective discharge criteria, including muscle strength and functional tests, are associated with risk of ACL graft rupture after RTS. 158 male professional athletes who underwent an ACL reconstruction and returned to their previous professional level of sport were included. Before players returned to sport they underwent a battery of discharge tests (isokinetic strength testing at 60°, 180° and 300°/s, a running t test, single hop, triple hop and triple crossover hop tests). Athletes were monitored for ACL re-ruptures once they returned to sport (median follow-up 646 days, range 1–2060). Of the 158 athletes, 26 (16.5%) sustained an ACL graft rupture an average of 105 days after RTS. Two factors were associated with increased risk of ACL graft rupture: (1) not meeting all six of the discharge criteria before returning to team training (HR 4.1, 95% CI 1.9 to 9.2, p ≤ 0.001); and (2) decreased hamstring to quadriceps ratio of the involved leg at 60°/s (HR 10.6 per 10% difference, 95% CI 10.2 to 11, p = 0.005). Athletes who did not meet the discharge criteria before returning to professional sport had a four times greater risk of sustaining an ACL graft rupture compared with those who met all six RTS criteria. In addition, hamstring to quadriceps strength ratio deficits were associated with an increased risk of an ACL graft rupture.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. • Grindem H, Snyder-Mackler L, Moksnes H, et al. Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(13):804–8. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between knee reinjury after ACL reconstruction and (1) return to level I sports, (2) timing of RTS and (3) knee function prior to return. 106 patients who participated in pivoting sports participated in this prospective 2-year cohort study. Sports participation and knee reinjury were recorded monthly. Knee function was assessed with the Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living Scale, global rating scale of function, and quadriceps strength and hop test symmetry. Pass RTS criteria were defined as scores >90 on all tests, failure as failing any. Patients who returned to level I sports had a 4.32 ( p = 0.048) times higher reinjury rate than those who did not. The reinjury rate was significantly reduced by 51% for each month RTS was delayed until 9 months after surgery, after which no further risk reduction was observed. 38.2% of those who failed RTS criteria suffered reinjuries versus 5.6% of those who passed (HR 0.16, p = 0.075). More symmetrical quadriceps strength prior to return significantly reduced the knee reinjury rate.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Joreitz R, Lynch A, Rabuck S, et al. Patient-specific and surgery specific factors that affect return to sport after ACL reconstruction. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016;11(2):264–78.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Waldén M, Hägglund M, Magnusson H, et al. ACL injuries in men's professional football: a 15-year prospective study on time trends and return-to-play rates reveals only 65% of players still play at the top level 3 years after ACL rupture. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(12):744–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dingenen B, Gokeler A. Optimization of the return-to-sport paradigm after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a critical step back to move forward. Sports Med. 2017;11.

  18. McGrath TM, Waddington G, Scarvell JM, et al. An ecological study of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part 1: clinical tests do not correlate with return-to-sport outcomes. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016;4(11):2325967116672208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lefevre N, Klouche S, Mirouse G, et al. Return to sport after primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(1):34–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Grassi A, Vascellari A, Combi A, et al. SIGASCOT Sports Committee. Return to sport after ACL reconstruction: a survey between the Italian Society of Knee, Arthroscopy, Sport, Cartilage and Orthopaedic Technologies (SIGASCOT) members. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016;26(5):509–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Undheim MB, Cosgrave C, King E, et al. Isokinetic muscle strength and readiness to return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is there an association? A systematic review and a protocol recommendation. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(20):1305–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ellman MB, Sherman SL, Forsythe B, et al. Return to play following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23(5):283–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Herbst E, Hoser C, Hildebrandt C, et al. Functional assessments for decision-making regarding return to sports following ACL reconstruction. Part II: clinical application of a new test battery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(5):1283–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Logerstedt D, Di Stasi S, Grindem H, et al. Self-reported knee function can identify athletes who fail return-to-activity criteria up to 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44(12):914–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Harris JD, Abrams GD, Bach BR, et al. Return to sport after ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics. 2014;37(2):e103–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Davies GJ, Zillmer DA. Functional progression of a patient through a rehabilitation program. Orthop Phys Therapy Clin North Am. 2000;9:103–18.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Davies, GJ. Individualizing the return to play decision after ACL reconstruction. Oper Tech Orthop. 2017. doi:10.1053/j.oto.2017.01.013. In press.

  28. Kennedy JC, Weinberg HW, Wilson AS. The anatomy and function of the anterior cruciate ligament. As determined by clinical and morphological studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56(2):223–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nagelli CV, Hewett TE. Should return to sport be delayed until 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Biological and functional considerations. Sports Med. 2017;47:221–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nagelli CV, Cook JL, Kuroki K, et al. Does anterior cruciate ligament innervation matter for joint function and development of osteoarthritis? J Knee Surg. 2017;30(4):364–371.

  31. Kim HJ, Lee JH, Lee DH. Proprioception in patients with anterior cruciate ligament tears. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Dec 1:363546516682231. doi:10.1177/0363546516682231.

  32. Suarez T, Laudani L, Giombini A, et al. Comparison in joint-position sense and muscle coactivation between anterior cruciate ligament-deficient and healthy individuals. J Sport Rehabil. 2016;25(1):64–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Davies GJ, Heiderscheidt B. Linea reliability of the Lido Linea closed kinetic chain isokinetic dynamometer. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997;25(2):133–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nicholas JA, Marino M. The relationship of injuries of the leg, foot, and ankle to proximal thigh strength in athletes. Foot Ankle. 1987;7(4):218–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gleim GW, Nicholas JA, Webb JN. Isokinetic evaluation following leg injuries. Phys Sportsmed. 1978;6(8):75–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Greenberger HB, Paterno MV. Relationship of knee extensor strength and hopping test performance in the assessment of lower extremity function. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995;22(5):202–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pincivero DM, Lephart SM, Karunakara RG. Relation between open and closed kinematic chain assessment of knee strength and functional performance. Clin J Sport Med. 1997;7(1):11–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Perry MC, Morrissey MC, King JB, et al. Effects of closed versus open kinetic chain knee extensor resistance training on knee laxity and leg function in patients during the 8- to 14-week post-operative period after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005;13(5):357–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Davies GJ. A compendium of isokinetics in clinical usage and rehabilitation techniques. Fourth ed. Onalaska: S. & S Publishers; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Davies GJ, Gould JA, et al. Torque acceleration energy and average power changes in quadriceps and hamstrings through the selected velocity spectrum as determined by computerized Cybex testing. Presented at the ACSM National Conference, 1983. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1983;15(2):144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gould JA, Davies GJ, et al. Computerized Cybex testing of ACL reconstruction assessing hamstrings peak torque, TAE, total work, and average power. Presented at the ACSM National Conference, 1984. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1984;16(2):204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mirkov DM, Knezevic OM, Maffiuletti NA, et al. Contralateral limb deficit after ACL-reconstruction: an analysis of early and late phase of rate of force development. J Sports Sci. 2017;35(5):435–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Larsen JB, Farup J, Lind M, et al. Muscle strength and functional performance is markedly impaired at the recommended time point for sport return after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in recreational athletes. Hum Mov Sci. 2015;39:73–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Myer GD, Martin L Jr, Ford KR, et al. No association of time from surgery with functional deficits in athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evidence for objective return-to-sport criteria. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(10):2256–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Vairo GL, Myers JB, Sell TC, et al. Neuromuscular and biomechanical landing performance subsequent to ipsilateral semitendinosus and gracilis autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(1):2–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Brumitt J, Engilis A, Isaak D, et al. Preseason jump and hop measures in male collegiate basketball players: an epidemiological report. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016;11(6):954–61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Brumitt J, Heiderscheit BC, Manske RC, et al. Lower extremity functional tests and risk of injury in Division III collegiate athletes. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013;8(3):216–27.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Brumitt J, Heiderscheit BC, Manske RC, et al. Off-season training habits and preseason functional test measures of Division III collegiate athletes: a descriptive report. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9(4):447–55.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Brumitt J, Heiderscheit BC, Manske RC, et al. The lower-extremity functional test and lower-quadrant injury in NCAA Division III athletes: a descriptive and epidemiologic report. J Sport Rehabil. 2016;25(3):219–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Narducci E, Waltz A, Gorski K, et al. The clinical utility of functional performance tests within one-year post-ACL reconstruction: a systematic review. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2011;6(4):333–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Physical Therapy Program, Armstrong State University, Savannah, GA, USA

    George J. Davies

  2. Coastal Therapy, Savannah, GA, USA

    George J. Davies

  3. Gundersen Health System, LaCrosse, WI, USA

    George J. Davies

  4. Sports Medicine and Performance Center, Colorado University, Boulder, CO, USA

    Eric McCarty

  5. Steadman Clinic and Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA

    Matthew Provencher

  6. Department of Physical Therapy, Wichita State University, Via Christi Health, Wichita, KS, USA

    Robert C. Manske

Authors
  1. George J. Davies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eric McCarty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthew Provencher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Robert C. Manske
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George J. Davies.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

George J. Davies and Matthew Provencher declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Eric McCarty reports consultancy fees from Zimmer and Biomet, Royalties from Elsevier, and institutional and educational support from Arthrex, Smith Nephew, and Depuy Mitey, outside of the submitted work.

Robert Manske reports royalties from Elsevier Science and Human Kinetics, and an honorarium from Rehab Champions, outside of the submitted work.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on ACL Rehab

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davies, G.J., McCarty, E., Provencher, M. et al. ACL Return to Sport Guidelines and Criteria. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 10, 307–314 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-017-9420-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-017-9420-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation