Skip to main content
Log in

The role of offset stems in revision knee arthroplasty

  • Revision Knee Arthroplasty (R Rossi, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) represents a technically challenging procedure. The use of an offset stem extension can help in addressing some of the difficulties that can be encountered during surgery and, in particular, anatomical mismatch, malalignment, and gap balancing. Different offset stem extensions are available and can be classified according to four parameters: modularity, location of the offset, direction, and size of the displacement. Offset stem extensions can assist with implant alignment on the metaphysis if there is an offset diaphysis, can avoid medial-lateral or anterior-posterior component overhang, can reduce the incidence of coronal or sagittal malalignment, and can help in balancing the flexion and extension spaces by effectively translating the components. The aim of this study is to give an overview of the currently available evidence regarding the use of offset stem extensions in revision TKA as well as some useful surgical tips.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instr Course Lect. 1999;48:167–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vince KG, Long W. Revision knee arthroplasty. The limits of press fit medullary fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;317:172–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dalury DF, Pomeroy DL, Gorab RS, Adams MJ. Why are total knee arthroplasties being revised? J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(8 Supp):120–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Engh GA, Parks NL. The management of bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 1997;46:227–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Morgan-Jones R, Oussedik SI, Graichen H, Haddad FS. Zonal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B(2):147–9. Introduces the concept of zonal fixation and describes the methods by which fixation in each zone can be obtained.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bourne RB, Finlay JB. The influence of tibial component intramedullary stems and implant-cortex contact on the strain distribution of the proximal tibia following total knee arthroplasty. An in vitro study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;208:95–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mabry TM, Hanssen AD. The role of stems and augments for bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(4 Suppl 1):56–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rawlinson JJ, Closkey Jr RF, Davis N, Wright TM, Windsor R. Stemmed implants improve stability in augmented constrained condylar knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(11):2639–43.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Whittaker JP, Dharmarajan R, Toms AD. The management of bone loss in revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2008;90(8):981–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. van Loon CJ, Kyriazopoulos A, Verdonschot N, et al. The role of femoral stem extension in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;378:282–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bugbee WD, Ammeen DJ, Engh GA. Does implant selection affect outcome of revision knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(5):581–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hanssen AD. Cemented stems are requisite in revision knee replacement. Orthopedics. 2004;27(9):990–1003.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nelson CL, Lonner JH, Rand JA, Lotke PA. Strategies of stem fixation and the role of supplemental bone graft in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85A:S52–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Completo A, Simões JA, Fonseca F, Oliveira M. The influence of different tibial stem designs in load sharing and stability at the cement-bone interface in revision TKA. Knee. 2008;15(3):227–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Completo A, Fonseca F, Simões JA. Strain shielding in proximal tibia of stemmed knee prosthesis: experimental study. J Biomech. 2008;41(3):560–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hicks CA, Noble P, Tullos H. The anatomy of the tibial intramedullary canal. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;321:111–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Radnay CS, Scuderi GR. Management of bone loss: augments, cones, offset stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446:83–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tang Q, Zhou Y, Yang D, Xu H, Liu Q. The offset of the tibial shaft from the tibial plateau in Chinese people. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(10):1981–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Abraham R, Malkani AL, Lewis J, Beck D. An anatomical study of tibial metaphyseal/diaphyseal mismatch during revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(2):241–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Goosen JHM, Van Hellemondt GG. Tibial component offset in revision total knee arthroplasty. In: Rossi R, Bonasia DE, editors. Total Knee Revision Surgical Techniques. Edizioni Minerva Medica 2013.

  21. Chan Â, Gamelas J, Folgado J, Fernandes PR. Biomechanical analysis of the tibial tray design in TKA: comparison between modular and offset tibial trays. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(3):590–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bertin KC, Freeman MA, Samuelson KM, Ratcliffe SS, Todd RC. Stemmed revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1985;67(2):242–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Parsley BS, Sugano N, Bertolusso R, Conditt MA. Mechanical alignment of tibial stems in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18(7 Suppl 1):33–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Friedman RJ, Hirst P, Poss R, Kelley K, Sledge CB. Results of revision total knee arthroplasty performed for aseptic loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;255:235–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gustilo T, Comadoll JL, Gustilo RB. Long-term results of 56 revision total knee replacements. Orthopedics. 1996;19(2):99–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nakasone CK, Abdeen A, Khachatourians AG, Sugimori T, Vince KG. Component alignment in revision total knee arthroplasty using diaphyseal engaging modular offset press-fit stems. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(8):1178–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Partington PF, Sawhney J, Rorabeck CH, Barrack RL, Moore J. Joint line restoration after revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;367:165–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Laskin RS. Joint line position restoration during revision total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:169–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mahoney OM, Kinsey TL. Modular femoral offset stems facilitate joint line restoration in revision knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446:93–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Brilhault JM, Ries MD. Influence of offset stem couplers in femoral revision knee arthroplasty: a radiographic study. Knee. 2012;19(2):112–5. Highlights the importance of an offset femoral stem extension in balancing the flexion gap and improving the alignment of the stem.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Innocenti M, Matassi F, Carulli C, Soderi S, Villano M, Civinini R. Joint line position in revision total knee arthroplasty: the role of posterior femoral off-set stems. Knee. 2013;20(6):447–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bellemans J. Restoring the joint line in revision TKA: does it matter? Knee. 2004;11(1):3–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Brilhault JM, Ries MD. Posteriorly offset femoral component to restore anteroposterior position of the distal femur in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(2):214–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Giovanni Balato and Vincenzo Franceschini declare that they have no conflict of interest. Andrea Baldini is a consultant with ZimmerBiomet with speaker agreement.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Baldini.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Revision Knee Arthroplasty

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baldini, A., Balato, G. & Franceschini, V. The role of offset stems in revision knee arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 8, 383–389 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-015-9294-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-015-9294-7

Keywords

Navigation