Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Fragility fractures of the pelvis

  • Trauma (MJ Gardner, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fragility fractures of the pelvis are common and the incidence is increasing with the aging population. The primary risk factor is osteoporosis. Diagnosis is challenging and advanced imaging with computed tomography (CT), bone scintigraphy, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is helpful. These injuries result in significant morbidity, including prolonged hospitalization, immobility, and loss of autonomy in previously active patients. The mortality rate is high, similar to hip fracture patients. This problem is underappreciated and deserves attention. An opportunity exists to improve outcomes with medical and surgical management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. • Hill RM, Robinson CM, Keating JF. Fractures of the pubic rami. Epidemiology and five-year survival. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(8):1141–4. This study points out the high rate of mortality associated with osteoporotic pelvic fractures. In addition, at five years there was no difference in mortality between patients with pelvic fractures and patients with hip fractures. We feel this finding is important and should be emphasized.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Taillandier J, Langue F, Alemanni M, et al. Mortality and functional outcomes of pelvic insufficiency fractures in older patients. Joint Bone Spine. 2003;70(4):287–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Breuil V, Roux CH, Testa J, et al. Outcome of osteoporotic pelvic fractures: An underestimated severity. Survey of 60 cases. Joint Bone Spine. 2008;75(5):585–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. • Morris RO, Sonibare A, Green DJ, et al. Closed pelvic fractures: characteristics and outcomes in older patients admitted to medical and geriatric wards. Postgrad Med J. 2000;76(900):646–50. This study is important to our understanding of the poor patient outcomes following conservative management of sacral insufficiency fractures. The authors demonstrate a significant impact on patient mobility and dependence post injury..

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, et al. Incidence and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis-Related Fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;22(3):465–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. • Kannus PP, Palvanen MM, Niemi SS, et al. Epidemiology of osteoporotic pelvic fractures in elderly people in Finland: sharp increase in 1970–1997 and alarming projections for the new millennium. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(5):443–8. This epidemiologic study highlights the rapid increase in the incidence of osteoporotic pelvic fractures in the elderly patient population. The authors emphasize that this trend is expected to continue with the number of fractures tripling by 2030. This data points to an important public health problem which deserves our attention..

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Melton LJ, Sampson JM, Morrey BF, et al. Epidemiologic features of pelvic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;155:43–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsiridis E, Upadhyay N, Giannoudis PV. Sacral insufficiency fractures: current concepts of management. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(12):1716–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pogrund H, Rigal W, Makin M, et al. Determination of osteoporosis in patients with fractured femoral neck using the Singh index: a Jerusalem study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;156:189.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gotis-Graham I, McGuigan L, Diamond T, et al. Sacral insufficiency fractures in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76(6):882.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Denis F, Davis S, Comfort T. Sacral fractures: an important problem. Retrospective analysis of 236 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;227:67–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dalal S, Burgess A, Siegel J, et al. Pelvic fracture in multiple trauma: classification by mechanism is key to pattern of organ injury, resuscitative requirements, and outcome. J Trauma. 1989;29(7):981–1000. discussion 1000–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Krappinger D, Kammerlander C, Hak DJ, et al. Low-energy osteoporotic pelvic fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130(9):1167–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Gagna G, et al. Transverse fracture of the upper sacrum. Suicidal jumper's fracture. Spine. 1985;10(9):838–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sabiston C, Wing P. Sacral fractures: classification and neurologic implications. J Trauma. 1986;26(12):1113–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Linstrom NJ, Heiserman JE, Kortman KE, et al. Anatomical and Biomechanical Analyses of the Unique and Consistent Locations of Sacral Insufficiency Fractures. Spine. 2009;34(4):309–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. De Smet AA, Neff JR. Pubic and sacral insufficiency fractures: clinical course and radiologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985;145(3):601–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grasland A, Pouchot J, Mathieu A, et al. Sacral insufficiency fractures: an easily overlooked cause of back pain in elderly women. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(6):668–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Peh WC, Khong PL, Yin Y, et al. Imaging of pelvic insufficiency fractures. Radiographics. 1996;16(2):335–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Blake SP. Sacral insufficiency fracture. Br J Radiol. 2004;77(922):891–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lyders EM, Whitlow CT, Baker MD, et al. Imaging and Treatment of Sacral Insufficiency Fractures. Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31(2):201–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gertzbein SD, Chenoweth DR. Occult injuries of the pelvic ring. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977;128:202–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Finiels H, Finiels P, Jacquot J, et al. Fractures of the sacrum caused by bone insufficiency. Meta-analysis of 508 cases. Presse Med. 1997;26(33):1568–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Peh W, Khong P, Ho W, et al. Sacral insufficiency fractures. Spectrum of radiological features. Clin Imaging. 1995;19(2):92–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cabarrus MC, Ambekar A, Lu Y, et al. MRI and CT of Insufficiency Fractures of the Pelvis and the Proximal Femur. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(4):995–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cosker TDA, Ghandour A, Gupta SK, et al. Pelvic ramus fractures in the elderly. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(4):513–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Babayev M, Lachmann E, Nagler W. The controversy surrounding sacral insufficiency fractures: to ambulate or not to ambulate? Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;79(4):404–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Koval KJ, Aharonoff GB, Schwartz MC, et al. Pubic rami fracture: A benign pelvic injury? J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11(1):7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rodan GA, Fleisch HA. Bisphosphonates: mechanisms of action. J Clin Invest. 1996;97(12):2692.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Reginster J, Minne H, Sorensen O, et al. Randomized trial of the effects of risedronate on vertebral fractures in women with established postmenopausal osteoporosis. Vertebral Efficacy with Risedronate Therapy (VERT) Study Group. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(1):83–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Liberman U, Weiss S, Broll J, et al. Effect of oral alendronate on bone mineral density and the incidence of fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis. The Alendronate Phase III Osteoporosis Treatment Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(22):1437–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. • Peichl P. Parathyroid Hormone 1–84 Accelerates Fracture-Healing in Pubic Bones of Elderly Osteoporotic Women. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(17):1583. This randomized controlled trial evaluating the use of recombinant human PTH in insufficiency fractures has encouraging results. The data suggests that recombinant human PTH can increase bone mineral density, reduce fracture risk, and enhance fracture healing. Further research is needed to determine the precise role of recombinant human PTH in the medical management of insufficiency fractures..

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pommersheim W, Huang-Hellinger F, Baker M, et al. Sacroplasty: a treatment for sacral insufficiency fractures. Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24(5):1003–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Butler CL, Given CA, Michel SJ, et al. Percutaneous sacroplasty for the treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184(6):1956–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Frey ME, DePalma MJ, Cifu DX, et al. Efficacy and safety of percutaneous sacroplasty for painful osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures: a prospective, multicenter trial. Spine. 2007;32(15):1635–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Richards AM, Mears SC, Knight TA, et al. Biomechanical Analysis of Sacroplasty: Does Volume or Location of Cement Matter? Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;30(2):315–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Beaulé PE, Antoniades J, Matta JM. Trans-sacral fixation for failed posterior fixation of the pelvic ring. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005;126(1):49–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. • Gardner MJ, Routt MLC. Transiliac-transsacral screws for posterior pelvic stabilization. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25(6):378–84. In this case series including patients with osteoporosis and insufficiency fractures the surgical technique and clinical experience using transiliac-transsacral screws is reported. The important points to note are greater screw length assists in distributing the load and resisting vertical shear forces, the holding power is increased by the additional screw threads, and that anchoring the screw in iliac cortical bone aids in maintenance of reduction. This technique is the mainstay of our surgical management of these patients..

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Moed BR, Whiting DR. Locked transsacral screw fixation of bilateral injuries of the posterior pelvic ring: initial clinical series. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(10):616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC Davis Medical Center, 4860 Y Street Suite 3800, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA

    Gillian L. S. Soles & Tania A. Ferguson

Authors
  1. Gillian L. S. Soles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tania A. Ferguson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tania A. Ferguson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soles, G.L.S., Ferguson, T.A. Fragility fractures of the pelvis. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 5, 222–228 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-012-9128-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-012-9128-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation