Skip to main content
Log in

Reflective and Automatic Processes in Health Care Professional Behaviour: a Dual Process Model Tested Across Multiple Behaviours

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background

Clinicians’ behaviours require deliberate decision-making in complex contexts and may involve both impulsive (automatic) and reflective (motivational and volitional) processes.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to test a dual process model applied to clinician behaviours in their management of type 2 diabetes.

Methods

The design used six nested prospective correlational studies. Questionnaires were sent to general practitioners and nurses in 99 UK primary care practices, measuring reflective (intention, action planning and coping planning) and impulsive (automaticity) predictors for six guideline-recommended behaviours: blood pressure prescribing (N = 335), prescribing for glycemic control (N = 288), providing diabetes-related education (N = 346), providing weight advice (N = 417), providing self-management advice (N = 332) and examining the feet (N = 218).

Results

Respondent retention was high. A dual process model was supported for prescribing behaviours, weight advice, and examining the feet. A sequential reflective process was supported for blood pressure prescribing, self-management and weight advice, and diabetes-related education.

Conclusions

Reflective and impulsive processes predict behaviour. Quality improvement interventions should consider both reflective and impulsive approaches to behaviour change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991; 50: 179-211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schwarzer R. Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psychol. 2008; 57: 1-29.

    Google Scholar 

  4. McEachan RRC, Conner M, Taylor N, Lawton RJ. Prospective prediction of health-related behaviors with the Theory of Planned Behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2011; 5: 97-144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Godin G, Bélanger-Gravel A, Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM. Healthcare professionals' intentions and behaviours: A systematic review of studies based on social cognitive theories. Implement Sci. 2008; 3: 36.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Evans JSBT. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008; 59: 255-278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Strack F, Deutsch R. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2004; 8: 220-247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Einstein GO, McDaniel MA, Williford CL, Pagan JL, Dismukes RK. Forgetting of intentions in demanding situations is rapid. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2003; 9: 147-162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Muraven M, Tice DM. Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998; 74: 1252-1265.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Orbell S, Sheeran P. "Inclined abstainers": A problem for predicting health-related behaviour. Br J Soc Psychol. 1998; 37: 151-165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sniehotta FF. Towards a theory of intentional behaviour change: Plans, planning and self-regulation. Br J Health Psychol. 2009; 14: 261-273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gollwitzer PM. Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. Am Psychol. 1999; 54: 493-503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kwasnicka D, White M, Presseau J, Sniehotta FF. Does planning how to cope with anticipated barriers facilitate health-related behaviour change? A systematic review. Health Psychol Rev. in press.

  14. Hofmann W, Friese M, Wiers RW. Impulsive versus reflective influences on health behavior: A theoretical framework and empirical review. Health Psychol Rev. 2008; 2: 111-137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sheeran P, Gollwitzer PM, Bargh JA. Nonconscious processes and health. Health Psychol. in press.

  16. Gardner B, de Bruijn G-J, Lally P. A systematic review and meta-analysis of applications of the self-report habit index to nutrition and physical activity behaviours. Ann Behav Med. 2011; 42: 174-187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nilsen P, Roback K, Broström A, Ellström P-E. Creatures of habit: Accounting for the role of habit in implementation research on clinical behaviour change. Implement Sci. 2012; 7: 53.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Verplanken B, Orbell S. Reflections on past behavior: A self-report index of habit strength. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2003; 33: 1313-1330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sniehotta FF, Presseau J. The habitual use of the self-report habit index. Ann Behav Med. 2012; 43: 139-140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gardner B, Abraham C, Lally P, de Bruijn G-J. Towards parsimony in habit measurement: Testing the convergent and predictive validity of an automaticity subscale of the Self-Report Habit Index. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012; 9: 102.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Eccles MP, Hrisos S, Francis JJ, et al. Instrument development, data collection and characteristics of practices, staff and measures in the Improving Quality of Care in Diabetes (iQuaD) Study. Implement Sci. 2011; 6: 61.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McFarlane SI, Jacober SJ, Winer N, et al. Control of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with diabetes and hypertension at urban academic medical centers. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25: 718-723.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Braga M, Casanova A, Teoh H, et al. Treatment gaps in the management of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes in Canada. Can J Cardiol. 2010; 26: 297-302.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hawthorne G, Hrisos S, Stamp E, et al. Diabetes care provision in UK primary care practices. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7: e41562.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Khunti K, Ganguli S, Baker R, Lowry A. Features of primary care associated with variations in process and outcome of care of people with diabetes. Br J Gen Pract. 2001; 51: 356-360.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Williams DR, Baxter HS, Airey CM, Alis S. Diabetes UK funded surveys of the structural provision of primary care diabetes services in the UK. Diabet Med. 2002; 19(Suppl 2): 21-26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Millett C, Car J, Eldred D, Khunti K, Mainous AG. Diabetes prevalence, process of care and outcomes in relation to practice size, caseload and deprivation: National cross-sectional study in primary care. J R Soc Med. 2007; 100: 275-283.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Verplanken B. Beyond frequency: Habit as mental construct. Br J Soc Psychol. 2006; 45: 639-656.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Eccles MP, Hawthorne G, Johnston M, et al. Improving the delivery of care for patients with diabetes through understanding optimised team work and organisation in primary care. Implement Sci. 2009; 4: 22.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fishbein M. Attitude and the prediction of behavior. In: Fishbein M, ed. Readings in attitude theory and measurement. New York: Wiley; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Presseau J, Johnston M, Francis JJ, et al. Theory-based predictors of multiple clinician behaviors in the management of diabetes. J Behav Med. in press.

  33. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992; 112: 155-159.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46: 81–95. doi:10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM, Johnston M, et al. Applying psychological theories to evidence-based clinical practice: Identifying factors predictive of managing upper respiratory tract infections without antibiotics. Implement Sci. 2007; 2: 26.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bonetti D, Johnston M, Clarkson JE, et al. Applying psychological theories to evidence-based clinical practice: Identifying factors predictive of placing preventive fissure sealants. Implement Sci. 2010; 5: 25.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Steen N, et al. Applying psychological theories to evidence-based clinical practice: Identifying factors predictive of lumbar spine X-ray for low back pain in UK primary care practice. Implement Sci. 2011; 6: 55.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Judah G, Gardner B, Aunger R. Forming a flossing habit: An exploratory study of the psychological determinants of habit formation. Br J Health Psychol. in press.

  39. Lally P, van Jaarsveld CHM, Potts HWW, Wardle J. How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2010; 40: 998-1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lally P, Wardle J, Gardner B. Experiences of habit formation: A qualitative study. Psychol Health Med. 2011; 16: 484-489.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lally P, Gardner B. Promoting habit formation. Health Psychol Rev. 2013; 7: S137-S158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sladek RM, Phillips PA, Bond MJ. Implementation science: A role for parallel dual processing models of reasoning? Implement Sci. 2006; 1: 12.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gardner B, Abraham C, Lally P, de Bruijn G-J. The habitual use of the Self-report Habit Index: A reply. Ann Behav Med. 2012; 43: 141-142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by a grant from Diabetes UK (06/0003342). JMG holds a Canada Research Chair in Health Knowledge Transfer and Uptake. FFS is funded by Fuse, the UK Clinical Research Collaboration Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, a UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence. Funding for Fuse from the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, UK Economic and Social Research Council, UK Medical Research Council, and the UK National Institute for Health Research.

Author’s Statement of Conflict of Interest and Adherence to Ethical Standards

Authors Justin Presseau, Marie Johnston, Tarja Heponiemi, Marko Elovainio, Jill J Francis, Martin P Eccles, Nick Steen, Susan Hrisos, Elaine Stamp, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Gillian Hawthorne, and Falko F Sniehotta declare that they have no conflict of interest. All procedures, including the informed consent process, were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.

All participants provided signed informed consent. Ethics approval was granted by the Newcastle and North Tyneside 2 Research Ethics Committee (07/H0907/102).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin Presseau Ph.D..

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 116 kb)

About this article

Cite this article

Presseau, J., Johnston, M., Heponiemi, T. et al. Reflective and Automatic Processes in Health Care Professional Behaviour: a Dual Process Model Tested Across Multiple Behaviours. ann. behav. med. 48, 347–358 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-014-9609-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-014-9609-8

Keywords

Navigation