Abstract
Background
Adherence to oral self-care behaviors is low among adolescents.
Purpose
This study aims to examine effects of two message framing interventions on oral self-care behaviors and health among Iranian adolescents.
Methods
Cluster-randomized controlled trial, with four schools randomly assigned to receive gain-framed, loss-framed, or no messages. Brushing/flossing, attitudes, intentions, oral health related quality of life (OHRQOL), and clinical examinations were measured at baseline, two and twenty-four weeks. Data were analyzed using multilevel modeling.
Results
At 2 weeks, loss-frame participants reported higher brushing and flossing rates, and more favorable attitudes and intentions to brush, compared to the other groups. At 24 weeks, loss-frame participants showed better OHRQOL, gingival health and less dental plaque compared to the other groups. Attitudes and intentions mediated intervention effects for the loss-framed group.
Conclusions
Loss-framed messages were more effective than gain-framed messages in encouraging oral self-care behaviors among Iranian adolescents. These effects were mediated through attitudes and intentions. (clinicaltrials.gov number NCT01421108.)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Crowley E, O’Brien G, Marcenes W. School league tables: A new population based predictor of dental restorative treatment need. Community Dent Health. 2003; 20: 78-82.
Hujoel PP, Cunha-Cruz J, Banting DW, Loesche WJ. Dental flossing and interproximal caries: A systematic review. J Dent Res. 2006; 85: 298-305.
Ciancio S. Improving oral health: Current considerations. J Clin Periodontol. 2003; 30(Suppl 5): 4-6.
Widstrom E. Prevention and dental health services. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2004; 2(Suppl 1): 255-258.
Pakpour AH, Hidarnia A, Hajizadeh E, Kumar S, Harrison AP. The status of dental caries and related factors in a sample of Iranian adolescents. Med Oral Patol Oral Cirugía Bucal. 2011; 16: e822-e827.
Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981; 211: 453-458.
Rothman AJ, Salovey P. Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychol Bull. 1997; 121: 3-19.
Akl EA, Oxman AD, Herrin J, et al.: Framing of health information messages. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011:CD006777.
Gallagher KM, Updegraff JA. Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Ann Behav Med. 2012; 43: 101-116.
Uskul A, Sherman D, Fitzgibbon J. The cultural congruency effect: Culture, regulatory focus, and the effectiveness of gain- vs. loss-framed halth messages. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2009; 45: 535-541.
Nisbett RN. The geography of thought. New York: Free Press; 2003.
Hui CH, Triandis H. Individualism-collectivism: A study of cross-cultural researchers. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 1986; 17: 225-248.
Kagitcibasi C. A critical appraisal of individualism and collectivism: Toward a new formulation. In: Kim U, Triandis H, Kagitcibasi C, Choi SC, Yoon G, eds. Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (Vol. 18). Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994: 52-65.
Oyserman D, Coon HM, Kemmelmeier M. Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychol Bull. 2002; 128: 3-72.
Han S, Shavitt S. Persuasion and culture: Advertising appeals in individualistic and collectivistic societies. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1994; 30: 326-350.
Hofstede G. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1980.
Mortazavi S, Karimi E. Cultural dimensions of paternalistic behavior: A cross-cultural research in 5 countries. In: Iwawaki S, Kashima Y, Leung K, eds. Innovations in cross-cultural psychology. Amsterdam: Garland Science; 1992: 147-151.
Aaker JL, Lee AY. ‘I’ seek pleasures and ‘we’ avoid pains: The role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. J Consum Res. 2001; 28: 33-49.
Sherman DK, Uskul AK, Updegraff JA. The role of the self in Responses to health communications: A cultural perspective. Self Identity. 2011; 10: 284-294.
Elliot AJ, Chirkov VI, Kim Y. Sheldon KM: Cross cultural analysis of avoidance (relative to approach) personal goals. Psychol Sci. 2001; 12: 505-510.
Hamamura T, Meijer Z, Heine SJ, Kamaya K, Hori I. Approach–avoidance motivation and information processing: A cross-cultural analysis. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2009; 35: 454-462.
Lee AY, Aaker JL, Gardner WL. The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: The role of interdependence in regulatory focus. J Personal Soc Psychol. 2000; 78: 1122-1134.
Knapp LG. Effects of type of value appealed to and valence of appeal on children’s dental health behavior. J Pediatr Psychol. 1991; 16: 675-686.
Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis. 1991; 50: 179-211.
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman; 1997.
Abraham C, Sheeran P, Johnston M. From health beliefs to self-regulation: Theoretical advances in the psychology of action control. Psychol Health. 1998; 13: 569-591.
O’Keefe DJ, Jensen JD. The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. J Commun. 2009; 59: 296–316.
Gallagher KM, Updegraff JA. Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals Behav Med. 2012; 43: 101-116.
Rothman AJ, Bedell TB, Detweiler JB, Salovey P. The systematic influence of gain- and loss-framed messages on interest in and use of different types of health behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1999; 25: 1355-1369.
Sherman DK, Mann T, Updegraff JA. Approach/avoidance motivation, message framing, and health behavior: Understanding the congruency effect. Motiv Emot. 2006; 30: 165-169.
Schneider TR, Salovey P, Pallonen U et al. Visual and auditory message framing effects on tobacco smoking. J Appl Social Psychol. 2001;31:667–682.
Pakpour AH, Hidarnia A, Hajizadeh E, Plotnikoff RC. Action and coping planning with regard to dental brushing among Iranian adolescents. Psychol Health Med. 2012; 17: 176-187.
Lavin D, Groarke A. Dental floss behaviour: A test of the predictive utility of the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the effects of making implementation intentions. Psychol Health Med. 2005; 10: 243-252.
Pakpour AH, Sniehotta FF. Perceived behavioural control and coping planning predict dental brushing behaviour among Iranian adolescents. J Clin Periodontol. 2012; 39: 132-137.
Pakpour AH, Yekaninejad MS, Zarei F, et al. The PedsQL Oral Health Scale in Iranian children: Reliability and validity. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2011; 21: 342-352.
Turesky S, Gilmore ND, Glickman I. Reduced plaque formation by the chloromethyl analogue of victamine C. J Periodontol. 1970; 41: 41-43.
Ainamo J, Ainamo A. Partial indices as indicators of the severity and prevalence of periodontal disease. Int Dent J. 1985; 35: 322-326.
Ainamo J, Barmes D, Beagrie G. Development of the World Health Organization (WHO) community periodontal index of traitment needs (CPITN). Int Dent J. 1982; 32: 281-291.
World Health Organization. Oral health surveys, basic methods (4th edn). Geneva: World Health Organization; 1997.
Krull JL, Mackinnon DP. Multilevel mediation modeling in group-based intervention studies. Eval Rev. 1999; 23: 418-444.
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 1995; 57: 289-300.
Rasbash J, Charlton C, Browne WJ, Healy M, Cameron B. MLwiN Version 2.1. Bristol: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol; 2009.
Sniehotta FF, Araujo Soares V, Dombrowski SU. Randomized controlled trial of a one-minute intervention changing oral self-care behavior. J Dent Res. 2007; 86: 641-645.
Heine SJ, Lehman DR, Ide E, et al. Divergent consequences of success and failure in Japan and North America: An investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selves. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2001; 81: 599-615.
Sherman DK, Updegraff JA, Mann T. Improving oral health behavior: A social psychological approach. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008; 139: 1382-1387.
Mann T, Sherman D, Updegraff J. Dispositional motivations and message framing: A test of the congruency hypothesis in college students. Health Psychol. 2004; 23: 330-334.
Updegraff JA, Sherman DK, Luyster FS, Mann TL. The effects of message quality and congruency on perceptions of tailored health communications. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2007; 43: 249-257.
Briñol P, Petty RE. Fundamental processes leading to attitude change: Implications for cancer prevention communications. J Commun. 2006; 56: S81-S104.
Lavin D, Groarke A. Dental floss behaviour: A test of the predictive utility of the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the effects of making implementation intentions. Psychol Health Med. 2005; 10: 243-252.
Rise J, Åstrøm A, Sutton S. Predicting intentions and use of dental floss among adolescents: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Psychol Health. 1998;13:223–236.
Conflict of interest and source of funding statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests. The study was supported by the Department of Public Health at Qazvin University of Medical Sciences. Falko F. Sniehotta is funded by Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, a UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence. Funding for Fuse from the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Economic and Social Research Council, Medical Research Council, the National Institute for Health Research, under the auspices of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration, is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Pakpour, A.H., Yekaninejad, M.S., Sniehotta, F.F. et al. The Effectiveness of Gain- Versus Loss-Framed Health Messages in Improving Oral Health in Iranian Secondary Schools: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial. ann. behav. med. 47, 376–387 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9543-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9543-1