Abstract
Background
Lung cancer patients and their spouses may engage in blame attributions regarding the cancer cause, which may adversely affect their psychological adjustment.
Purpose
The aim of this study was to examine whether dyadic adjustment and network support moderate the association between blame and distress in couples affected by lung cancer.
Methods
Patients and their spouses completed questionnaires within 1 month of treatment initiation (baseline) and at 6-month follow-up.
Results
Multilevel modeling of data from 158 couples revealed that, at baseline, dyadic adjustment moderated the association between blame and distress for patients but not spouses (p < 0.05). Controlling for baseline distress, baseline blame predicted later distress (p < 0.05) for both patients and spouses regardless of dyadic adjustment. Network support moderated this association at follow-up.
Conclusion
For patients experiencing low dyadic adjustment, blame was associated with increased distress. Not initially but later, network support may protect against low levels but not high levels of blame in patients and spouses.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al., eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 1975–2008.
Tammemagi CM, Neslund-Dudas C, Simoff M, Kvale P. Impact of comorbidity on lung cancer survival. Int J Cancer. 2003; 103: 792-802.
Zabora J, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Curbow B, Hooker C, Piantadosi S. The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psychooncology. 2001; 10: 19-28.
Coyne JC, Fiske V. Couples coping with chronic and catastrophic illness. In: Akamatsu TJ, Stephens MAP, Hobfoll SE, Crowther JH, eds. Family Health Psychology. Washington, DC: Hemisphere; 1992: 129-149.
Neuling SJ, Winefield HR. Social support and recovery after surgery for breast cancer: frequency and correlates of supportive behaviours by family, friends and surgeon. Soc Sci Med. 1988; 27: 385-392.
Carmack Taylor CL, Badr H, Lee JH, et al. Lung cancer patients and their spouses: psychological and relationship functioning within 1 month of treatment initiation. Ann Behav Med. 2008; 36: 129-140.
Ferrucci LM, Cartmel B, Turkman YE, et al. Causal attribution among cancer survivors of the 10 most common cancers. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2011; 29: 121-140.
Sasco AJ, Secretan MB, Straif K. Tobacco smoking and cancer: a brief review of recent epidemiological evidence. Lung Cancer. 2004; 45(Suppl 2): S3-S9.
Gulyn LM, Youssef F. Attribution of blame for breast and lung cancers in women. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2010; 28: 291-301.
Chapple A, Ziebland S, McPherson A. Stigma, shame, and blame experienced by patients with lung cancer: qualitative study. BMJ. 2004; 328: 1470.
Else-Quest NM, LoConte NK, Schiller JH, Hyde JS. Perceived stigma, self-blame, and adjustment among lung, breast and prostate cancer patients. Psychol Health. 2009; 24: 949-964.
Bennett KK, Compas BE, Beckjord E, Glinder JG. Self-blame and distress among women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. J Behav Med. 2005; 28: 313-323.
Glinder JG, Compas BE. Self-blame attributions in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: a prospective study of psychological adjustment. Health Psychol. 1999; 18: 475-481.
Salander P. Attributions of lung cancer: my own illness is hardly caused by smoking. Psychooncology. 2007; 16: 587-592.
Faller H, Schilling S, Lang H. Causal attribution and adaptation among lung cancer patients. J Psychosom Res. 1995; 39: 619-627.
Lobchuk MM, Murdoch T, McClement SE, McPherson C. A dyadic affair: who is to blame for causing and controlling the patient's lung cancer? Cancer Nurs. 2008; 31: 435-443.
Janoff-Bulman R. Characterological versus behavioral self-blame: inquiries into depression and rape. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1979; 37: 1798-1809.
Friedman LC, Romero C, Elledge R, et al. Attribution of blame, self-forgiving attitude and psychological adjustment in women with breast cancer. J Behav Med. 2007; 30: 351-357.
Lobchuk MM, McClement SE, McPherson C, Cheang M. Does blaming the patient with lung cancer affect the helping behavior of primary caregivers? Oncol Nurs Forum. 2008; 35: 681-689.
Fincham FD, Bradbury TN. Marital satisfaction, depression, and attributions—a longitudinal analysis. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1993; 64: 442-452.
Weiner B. A cognitive (attribution)–emotion–action model of motivated behavior: an analysis of judgements of help-giving. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1980; 39: 186-200.
Spanier GB. Measuring dyadic adjustment—new scales for assessing quality of marriage and similar dyads. J Marriage Fam. 1976; 38: 15-28.
Badr H, Acitelli LK, Taylor CL. Does talking about their relationship affect couples' marital and psychological adjustment to lung cancer? J Cancer Surviv. 2008; 2: 53-64.
Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer; 1984.
Lebel S, Devins GM. Stigma in cancer patients whose behavior may have contributed to their disease. Future Oncol. 2008; 4: 717-733.
Ryan PJ, Howell V, Jones J, Hardy EJ. Lung cancer, caring for the caregivers. A qualitative study of providing pro-active social support targeted to the carers of patients with lung cancer. Palliat Med. 2008; 22: 233-238.
Manne S, Badr H, Zaider T, Nelson C, Kissane D. Cancer-related communication, relationship intimacy, and psychological distress among couples coping with localized prostate cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2010; 4: 74-85.
Badr H, Carmack Taylor CL. Sexual dysfunction and spousal communication in couples coping with prostate cancer. Psychooncology. 2009; 18: 735-746.
Badr H, Carmack CL, Kashy DA, Cristofanilli M, Revenson TA. Dyadic coping in metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychol. 2010; 29: 169-180.
Badr H, Carmack Taylor CL. Effects of relationship maintenance on psychological distress and dyadic adjustment among couples coping with lung cancer. Health Psychol. 2008; 27: 616-627.
Milbury K, Badr H. Sexual problems, communication patterns, and depressive symptoms in couples coping with metastatic breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2012. doi:10.1002/pon.3079.
Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982; 5: 649-655.
Jacobson NS, Schmaling KB, Holtzworthmunroe A. Component analysis of behavioral marital therapy: 2-year follow-up and prediction of relapse. J Marital Fam Ther. 1987; 13: 187-195.
Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL. The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med. 1991; 32: 705-714.
Derogatis LR. Brief Symptom Inventory: Administration, Scoring, and Procedures Manual. 3rd ed. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems; 1993.
Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic Data Analysis. New York: Guilford; 2006.
Campbell L, Kashy DA. Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: a user-friendly guide. Pers Relat. 2002; 9: 327-342.
Wolfer R, Sang C. Comparing the SAS GLM and MIXED Procedures for Repeated Measures. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual SAS Users Group Conference, Cary, NC. Cary, NC: 1995.
Snijders T, Bosker R. Multilevel Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1999.
Preacher KJ, Curran PJ, Bauer DJ. Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. J Educ Behav Stat. 2006; 31: 437-448.
Hays WL. Statistics. 4th ed. Orlando: Rinehart and Winston; 1988.
LoConte NK, Else-Quest NM, Eickhoff J, Hyde J, Schiller JH. Assessment of guilt and shame in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer compared with patients with breast and prostate cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2008; 9: 171-178.
Manne SL, Ostroff JS, Norton TR, et al. Cancer-related relationship communication in couples coping with early stage breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2006; 15: 234-247.
Manne S, Sherman M, Ross S, et al. Couples' support-related communication, psychological distress, and relationship satisfaction among women with early stage breast cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004; 72: 660-670.
Kim Y, Kashy DA, Wellisch DK, et al. Quality of life of couples dealing with cancer: dyadic and individual adjustment among breast and prostate cancer survivors and their spousal caregivers. Ann Behav Med. 2008; 35: 230-238.
Manne SBH. Intimacy processes and psychological distress among couples coping with head and neck or lung cancers. Psychooncology. 2010; 19: 941-954.
Manne S. Couples coping with cancer—research issues and recent findings. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 1994; 1: 317-330.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Milbury, K., Badr, H. & Carmack, C.L. The Role of Blame in the Psychosocial Adjustment of Couples Coping with Lung Cancer. ann. behav. med. 44, 331–340 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9402-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9402-5