Skip to main content
Log in

The Role of Blame in the Psychosocial Adjustment of Couples Coping with Lung Cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background

Lung cancer patients and their spouses may engage in blame attributions regarding the cancer cause, which may adversely affect their psychological adjustment.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to examine whether dyadic adjustment and network support moderate the association between blame and distress in couples affected by lung cancer.

Methods

Patients and their spouses completed questionnaires within 1 month of treatment initiation (baseline) and at 6-month follow-up.

Results

Multilevel modeling of data from 158 couples revealed that, at baseline, dyadic adjustment moderated the association between blame and distress for patients but not spouses (p < 0.05). Controlling for baseline distress, baseline blame predicted later distress (p < 0.05) for both patients and spouses regardless of dyadic adjustment. Network support moderated this association at follow-up.

Conclusion

For patients experiencing low dyadic adjustment, blame was associated with increased distress. Not initially but later, network support may protect against low levels but not high levels of blame in patients and spouses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al., eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 1975–2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tammemagi CM, Neslund-Dudas C, Simoff M, Kvale P. Impact of comorbidity on lung cancer survival. Int J Cancer. 2003; 103: 792-802.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zabora J, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Curbow B, Hooker C, Piantadosi S. The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psychooncology. 2001; 10: 19-28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Coyne JC, Fiske V. Couples coping with chronic and catastrophic illness. In: Akamatsu TJ, Stephens MAP, Hobfoll SE, Crowther JH, eds. Family Health Psychology. Washington, DC: Hemisphere; 1992: 129-149.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Neuling SJ, Winefield HR. Social support and recovery after surgery for breast cancer: frequency and correlates of supportive behaviours by family, friends and surgeon. Soc Sci Med. 1988; 27: 385-392.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Carmack Taylor CL, Badr H, Lee JH, et al. Lung cancer patients and their spouses: psychological and relationship functioning within 1 month of treatment initiation. Ann Behav Med. 2008; 36: 129-140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferrucci LM, Cartmel B, Turkman YE, et al. Causal attribution among cancer survivors of the 10 most common cancers. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2011; 29: 121-140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sasco AJ, Secretan MB, Straif K. Tobacco smoking and cancer: a brief review of recent epidemiological evidence. Lung Cancer. 2004; 45(Suppl 2): S3-S9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gulyn LM, Youssef F. Attribution of blame for breast and lung cancers in women. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2010; 28: 291-301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chapple A, Ziebland S, McPherson A. Stigma, shame, and blame experienced by patients with lung cancer: qualitative study. BMJ. 2004; 328: 1470.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Else-Quest NM, LoConte NK, Schiller JH, Hyde JS. Perceived stigma, self-blame, and adjustment among lung, breast and prostate cancer patients. Psychol Health. 2009; 24: 949-964.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bennett KK, Compas BE, Beckjord E, Glinder JG. Self-blame and distress among women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. J Behav Med. 2005; 28: 313-323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Glinder JG, Compas BE. Self-blame attributions in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: a prospective study of psychological adjustment. Health Psychol. 1999; 18: 475-481.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Salander P. Attributions of lung cancer: my own illness is hardly caused by smoking. Psychooncology. 2007; 16: 587-592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Faller H, Schilling S, Lang H. Causal attribution and adaptation among lung cancer patients. J Psychosom Res. 1995; 39: 619-627.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lobchuk MM, Murdoch T, McClement SE, McPherson C. A dyadic affair: who is to blame for causing and controlling the patient's lung cancer? Cancer Nurs. 2008; 31: 435-443.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Janoff-Bulman R. Characterological versus behavioral self-blame: inquiries into depression and rape. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1979; 37: 1798-1809.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Friedman LC, Romero C, Elledge R, et al. Attribution of blame, self-forgiving attitude and psychological adjustment in women with breast cancer. J Behav Med. 2007; 30: 351-357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lobchuk MM, McClement SE, McPherson C, Cheang M. Does blaming the patient with lung cancer affect the helping behavior of primary caregivers? Oncol Nurs Forum. 2008; 35: 681-689.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fincham FD, Bradbury TN. Marital satisfaction, depression, and attributions—a longitudinal analysis. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1993; 64: 442-452.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Weiner B. A cognitive (attribution)–emotion–action model of motivated behavior: an analysis of judgements of help-giving. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1980; 39: 186-200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Spanier GB. Measuring dyadic adjustment—new scales for assessing quality of marriage and similar dyads. J Marriage Fam. 1976; 38: 15-28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Badr H, Acitelli LK, Taylor CL. Does talking about their relationship affect couples' marital and psychological adjustment to lung cancer? J Cancer Surviv. 2008; 2: 53-64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer; 1984.

  25. Lebel S, Devins GM. Stigma in cancer patients whose behavior may have contributed to their disease. Future Oncol. 2008; 4: 717-733.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ryan PJ, Howell V, Jones J, Hardy EJ. Lung cancer, caring for the caregivers. A qualitative study of providing pro-active social support targeted to the carers of patients with lung cancer. Palliat Med. 2008; 22: 233-238.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Manne S, Badr H, Zaider T, Nelson C, Kissane D. Cancer-related communication, relationship intimacy, and psychological distress among couples coping with localized prostate cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2010; 4: 74-85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Badr H, Carmack Taylor CL. Sexual dysfunction and spousal communication in couples coping with prostate cancer. Psychooncology. 2009; 18: 735-746.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Badr H, Carmack CL, Kashy DA, Cristofanilli M, Revenson TA. Dyadic coping in metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychol. 2010; 29: 169-180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Badr H, Carmack Taylor CL. Effects of relationship maintenance on psychological distress and dyadic adjustment among couples coping with lung cancer. Health Psychol. 2008; 27: 616-627.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Milbury K, Badr H. Sexual problems, communication patterns, and depressive symptoms in couples coping with metastatic breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2012. doi:10.1002/pon.3079.

  32. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982; 5: 649-655.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jacobson NS, Schmaling KB, Holtzworthmunroe A. Component analysis of behavioral marital therapy: 2-year follow-up and prediction of relapse. J Marital Fam Ther. 1987; 13: 187-195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL. The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med. 1991; 32: 705-714.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Derogatis LR. Brief Symptom Inventory: Administration, Scoring, and Procedures Manual. 3rd ed. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic Data Analysis. New York: Guilford; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Campbell L, Kashy DA. Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: a user-friendly guide. Pers Relat. 2002; 9: 327-342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wolfer R, Sang C. Comparing the SAS GLM and MIXED Procedures for Repeated Measures. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual SAS Users Group Conference, Cary, NC. Cary, NC: 1995.

  39. Snijders T, Bosker R. Multilevel Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Preacher KJ, Curran PJ, Bauer DJ. Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. J Educ Behav Stat. 2006; 31: 437-448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hays WL. Statistics. 4th ed. Orlando: Rinehart and Winston; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  42. LoConte NK, Else-Quest NM, Eickhoff J, Hyde J, Schiller JH. Assessment of guilt and shame in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer compared with patients with breast and prostate cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2008; 9: 171-178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Manne SL, Ostroff JS, Norton TR, et al. Cancer-related relationship communication in couples coping with early stage breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2006; 15: 234-247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Manne S, Sherman M, Ross S, et al. Couples' support-related communication, psychological distress, and relationship satisfaction among women with early stage breast cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004; 72: 660-670.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kim Y, Kashy DA, Wellisch DK, et al. Quality of life of couples dealing with cancer: dyadic and individual adjustment among breast and prostate cancer survivors and their spousal caregivers. Ann Behav Med. 2008; 35: 230-238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Manne SBH. Intimacy processes and psychological distress among couples coping with head and neck or lung cancers. Psychooncology. 2010; 19: 941-954.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Manne S. Couples coping with cancer—research issues and recent findings. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 1994; 1: 317-330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathrin Milbury Ph.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Milbury, K., Badr, H. & Carmack, C.L. The Role of Blame in the Psychosocial Adjustment of Couples Coping with Lung Cancer. ann. behav. med. 44, 331–340 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9402-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9402-5

Keywords

Navigation