Skip to main content
Log in

The Built Environment Moderates Effects of Family-Based Childhood Obesity Treatment over 2 Years

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background

Research suggests the neighborhood built environment is related to child physical activity and eating.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine if characteristics of the neighborhood environment moderate the relationship between obesity treatment and weight loss, and if outcomes of particular treatments are moderated by built environment characteristics.

Method

The relationship between the built environment and standardized BMI (zBMI) changes for 191 8–12-year-old children who participated in one of four randomized, controlled trials of pediatric weight management was assessed using mixed models analysis of covariance.

Results

At 2-year follow-up, greater parkland, fewer convenience stores, and fewer supermarkets were associated with greater zBMI reduction across all interventions. No treatments interacted with characteristics of the built environment.

Conclusions

Activity- and eating-related built neighborhood characteristics are associated with child success in behavioral obesity treatments. Efficacy may be improved by individualizing treatments based on built environment characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gordon-Larsen P, Nelson MC, Page P, Popkin BM. Inequality in the built environment underlies key health disparities in physical activity and obesity. Pediatrics. 2006;117:417-424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Oreskovic NM, Winickoff JP, Kuhlthau KA, Romm D, Perrin JM. Obesity and the built environment among Massachusetts children. Clin Pediatr Phila. 2009;48:904-912.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Oreskovic NM, Kuhlthau KA, Romm D, Perrin JM. Built environment and weight disparities among children in high- and low-income towns. Acad Pediatr. 2009;9:315-321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grafova IB. Overweight children: Assessing the contribution of the built environment. Prev Med. 2008;47:304-308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolch J, Jerrett M, Reynolds K, et al. Childhood obesity and proximity to urban parks and recreational resources: A longitudinal cohort study. Health Place. 2011;17:207-214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Roemmich JN, Epstein LH, Raja S, Yin L, Robinson J, Winiewicz D. Association of access to parks and recreational facilities with the physical activity of young children. Prev Med. 2006;43:437-41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roemmich JN, Epstein LH, Raja S, Yin L. The neighborhood and home environments: Disparate relationships with physical activity and sedentary behaviors in youth. Ann Behav Med. 2007;33:29-38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Black JB, Chen D. Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: An environment scale evaluation. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1552-1558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giles-Corti B, Macintyre S, Clarkson JP, Pikora T, Donovan RJ. Environmental and lifestyle factors associated with overweight and obesity in Perth, Australia. Am J Health Promot. 2003;18:93-102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morland KB, Evenson KR. Obesity prevalence and the local food environment. Health Place. 2009;15:491-495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Raja S, Yin L, Roemmich JN, et al. Food environment, built environment, and women's BMI: Evidence from Erie County, New York. J Plann Educ Res. 2010;29:444-460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Baranowski T, Cullen KW, Nicklas T, Thompson D, Baranowski J. Are current health behavioral change models helpful in guiding prevention of weight gain efforts? Obes Res. 2003;11(Suppl):23S-43S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Egger G, Swinburn B. An "ecological" approach to the obesity pandemic. BMJ. 1997;315:477-480.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. French SA, Story M, Jeffery RW. Environmental influences on eating and physical activity. Annu Rev Public Health. 2001;22:309-335.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Epstein LH. Development of evidence-based treatments for pediatric obesity. In: Kazdin AE, Weisz JR, eds. Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents. New York: Guilford Publications, Inc.; 2003:374-388.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Epstein LH, Paluch RA, Roemmich JN, Beecher MD. Family-based obesity treatment, then and now: Twenty-five years of pediatric obesity treatment. Health Psychol. 2007;26:381-391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ogden CL, Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends in overweight among US children and adolescents, 1999–2000. JAMA. 2002;288:1728-1732.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Troiano RP, Flegal KM, Kuczmarski RJ, Campbell SM, Johnson CL. Overweight prevalence and trends for children and adolescents. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1963 to 1991. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149:1085-1091.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Epstein LH, Paluch RA, Gordy CC, Dorn J. Decreasing sedentary behaviors in treating pediatric obesity. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154:220-226.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Epstein LH, Paluch RA, Gordy CC, Saelens BE, Ernst MM. Problem solving in the treatment of childhood obesity. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68:717-721.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Epstein LH, Paluch RA, Kilanowski CK, Raynor HA. The effect of reinforcement or stimulus control to reduce sedentary behavior in the treatment of pediatric obesity. Health Psychol. 2004;23:371-380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Epstein LH, Roemmich JN, Stein RI, Paluch RA, Kilanowski CK. The challenge of identifying behavioral alternatives to food: Clinic and field studies. Ann Behav Med. 2005;30:201-209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Epstein LH, Raja S, Gold SS, Paluch RA, Pak Y, Roemmich JN. Reducing sedentary behavior: The relationship between park area and the physical activity of youth. Psychol Sci. 2006;17:654-659.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Guo SS, et al. CDC growth charts for the United States: Methods and development. Vital Health Statistics. Series 11, Volume 246. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2002: 1–90.

  25. Hollingshead AB. Four factor index of social status. New Haven, CT: Yale University; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  26. ESRI. ArcGIS 9. Redlands, CA: ESRI GIS and Mapping software; 2004.

  27. Raja S, Ma C, Yadav P. Beyond food deserts: Measuring and mapping disparities in the neighborhood food environment. J Plann Educ Res. 2008;27:469-482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ewing R. Can the physical environment determine physical activity levels? Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2005;33:69-75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Frank LD, Schmid TL, Sallis JF, Chapman J, Saelens BE. Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: Findings from SMARTRAQ. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28:117-125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD. Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Ann Behav Med. 2003;25:80-91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mecredy G, Pickett W, Janssen I. Street connectivity is negatively associated with physical activity in Canadian youth. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8:3333-3350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dunkley BA, Helling A, Sawicki DS. Accessibility versus scale: Examining the tradeoffs in grocery stores. J Plann Educ Res. 2004;23:387-401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Department of Labor. Bureau of Labor Statistics. American Time Use Survey (ATUS). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research; 2010.

  34. Jaccard J, Wan CK, Turrisi R. The detection and interpretation of interaction effects between continuous variables in multiple regression. Multivar Behav Res. 1990;25:467-478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. SAS Institute Inc. SAS OnlineDoc® 9.1.3. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.; 2004.

  36. Nakagawa S, Foster TM. The case against retrospective statistical power analyses with an introduction to power analysis. Acta Ethol. 2004;7:103-108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hoenig JM, Heisey DM. The abuse of power: The pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis. Am Stat. 2001;55:1-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kristal AR, Goldenhar L, Muldoon J, Morton RF. Evaluation of a supermarket intervention to increase consumption of fruits and vegetables. Am J Health Promot. 1997;11:422-425.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Anderson JV, Bybee DI, Brown RM, et al. 5 a day fruit and vegetable intervention improves consumption in a low income population. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001;101:195-202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ni Mhurchu C, Blakely T, Jiang Y, Eyles HC, Rodgers A. Effects of price discounts and tailored nutrition education on supermarket purchases: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91:736-747.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Nederkoorn C, Guerrieri R, Havermans RC, Roefs A, Jansen A. The interactive effect of hunger and impulsivity on food intake and purchase in a virtual supermarket. Int J Obes (Lond). 2009;33:905-912.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Strauss RS, Pollack HA. Epidemic increase in childhood overweight, 1986–1998. JAMA. 2001;286:2845-2848.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Jeffery RW, French SA. Epidemic obesity in the United States: Are fast foods and television viewing contributing? Am J Public Health. 1998;88:277-280.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Hill JO, Wyatt HR, Reed GW, Peters JC. Obesity and the environment: Where do we go from here? Science. 2003;299:853-855.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Appreciation is expressed to Dominica Vito, CeCe Gordy, and Colleen Kilanowski, who coordinated studies at the University at Buffalo; and research assistants, therapists, and families who made this research possible; to Robert Shibley, Dean of the School of Architecture and Planning, for providing a GIS parks layer; to Dale Morris, Erie County, New York, for providing Erie County GIS parcel layers; and Kruti Bhatia for assistance with land parcel data. The development of this article was funded in part by grants HD 25997, HD 39778, HD 39792, and HD 42766 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, grant DK 88380 from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive Diseases, awarded to Dr. Epstein, and grant MH070446 from the National Institute of Mental Health awarded to Dr.Wilfley. The funding agencies were not involved in analysis or interpretation of the data.

Conflict of Interest

The authors do not have any conflict of interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonard H. Epstein Ph.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Epstein, L.H., Raja, S., Daniel, T.O. et al. The Built Environment Moderates Effects of Family-Based Childhood Obesity Treatment over 2 Years. ann. behav. med. 44, 248–258 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9383-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9383-4

Keywords

Navigation