Skip to main content
Log in

Attrition and Adherence Rates of Sustained vs. Intermittent Exercise Interventions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background

No conclusions have been drawn regarding the relative attrition and adherence rates associated with sustained vs. intermittent exercise programs.

Purpose

The study aims to systematically examine randomized controlled exercise intervention trials that report attrition and/or adherence rates to sustained vs. intermittent aerobic exercise programs.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted, and references from qualifying articles were searched for additional papers.

Results

Fourteen articles met inclusion criteria, capturing 783 (76% female) enrolled and 599 (74% female) retained participants (mean age = 42.3 ± 6.6 years). Study durations ranged from 8 weeks to 18 months (mean duration = 22.7 ± 21.9 weeks). Although results varied, no consistent differences in attrition or adherence rates between sustained and intermittent exercise protocols were revealed.

Conclusions

Given the universally low rate of regular exercise participation and the ongoing problem of adherence to exercise protocols, the field may benefit from randomized controlled trials examining sustained vs. intermittent exercise programs in greater depth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although often used interchangeably, the terms physical activity and exercise technically describe slightly different concepts: Physical activity is defined as bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that requires energy expenditure and produces progressive health benefits, whereas exercise is defined as a form of physical activity that is planned, structured, repetitive, and performed with the goal of improving health or fitness [2]. We consistently use the term exercise throughout this review despite the literature’s interchangeable use of the two terms.

References

  1. Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF: Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA. 2004, 291:12381245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. US Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS): 2008 physical activity guidelines for Americans. Washington, DC: USDHHS, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schoenborn CA, Adams PF: Health behaviors of adults: United States, 2005–2007. Vital Health Stat. 2010, 10 (245).

  4. Dishman RK: Exercise adherence: Its impact on public health. Champaign: Human Kinetics Books, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. King A, Castro C, Wilcox S, et al: Personal and environmental factors associated with physical inactivity among different racial-ethnic groups of U.S. middle-aged and older-aged women. Health Psychol. 2000, 19:354364.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chinn D, White M, Harland J, et al.: Barriers to physical activity and socioeconomic position: Implications for health promotion. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999, 53:191192.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ryan R, Frederick C, Lepes D, et al: Intrinsic motivation and exercise adherence. Int J Sport Psychol. 1997, 28:335354.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Trost S, Owen N, Bauman A, et al.: Correlates of adults’ participation in physical activity: Review and update. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002, 34:19962000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kahn EB, Ramsey LT, Brownson RC, et al.: The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity: A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2002, 22:73107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Task Force on Community Preventive Services: Recommendations to increase physical activity in communities. Am J Prev Med. 2001, 22(suppl):6772.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hillsdon M, Foster C, Thorogood M: Interventions for promoting physical activity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005, CD003180.

  12. Blamey A, Mutrie N: Changing the individual to promote health-enhancing physical activity: The difficulties of producing evidence and translating it into practice. J Sports Sci. 2004, 22:741754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, et al.: Physical activity and public health: Updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2007, 39:14231434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Blair SN, LaMonte MJ, Nichaman MZ: The evolution of physical activity recommendations: How much is enough? Am J Clin Nutr. 2004, 79:913S-920S.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Perri M. G., Anton SD, Durning PE, et al.: Adherence to exercise prescriptions: Effects of prescribing moderate versus higher levels of intensity and frequency. Health Psychology. 2002, 21:452458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Murphy MH, Blair SN, Murtagh EM: Accumulated versus continuous exercise for health benefit: A review of empirical studies. Sports Med. 2009, 39:2943.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pollock ML, Gaesser GA, Butcher JD, et al.: ACSM position stand: The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, and flexibility in healthy adults. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 1998, 30:975991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Macfarlane DJ, Taylor LH, Cuddihy TF: Very short intermittent vs continuous bouts of activity in sedentary adults. Preventive Medicine. 2006, 43:332336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jakicic JM, Winters C, Lang W, Wing RR: Effects of intermittent exercise and use of home exercise equipment on adherence, weight loss, and fitness in overweight women: A randomized trial. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999, 282:15541560.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jacobsen DJ, Donnelly JE, Snyder HK, Livingston K: Adherence and attrition with intermittent and continuous exercise in overweight women. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2003, 24:159164.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jakicic JM, Wing RR, Butler BA, Robertson RJ: Prescribing exercise in multiple short bouts versus one continuous bout: Effects on adherence, cardiorespiratory fitness, and weight loss in overweight women. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders: Journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. 1995, 19:893901.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Murphy MH, Hardman AE: Training effects of short and long bouts of brisk walking in sedentary women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998, 30:152157.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schmidt WD, Biwer CJ, Kalscheuer LK: Effects of long versus short bout exercise on fitness and weight loss in overweight females. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001, 20:494501.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. DeBusk RF, Stenestrand U, Sheehan M, Haskell WL: Training effects of long versus short bouts of exercise in healthy subjects. The American Journal of Cardiology. 1990, 65:10101013.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Coleman KJ, Raynor HR, Mueller DM, et al.: Providing sedentary adults with choices for meeting their walking goals. Preventive Medicine. 1999, 28:510519.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Woolf-May K, Kearney EM, Jones DW, et al.: The effect of two different 18-week walking programmes on aerobic fitness, selected blood lipids and factor XIIa. Journal of Sports Sciences. 1998, 16:701710.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Woolf-May K, Kearney EM, Owen A, et al.: The efficacy of accumulated short bouts versus single daily bouts of brisk walking in improving aerobic fitness and blood lipid profiles. Health Educ. Res. 1999, 14:803815.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Osei-Tutu KB, Campagna PD: The effects of short- vs. long-bout exercise on mood, VO2max., and percent body fat. Preventive Medicine. 2005, 40:9298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Quinn TJ, Klooster JR, Kenefick RW: Two short, daily activity bouts vs. one long bout: Are health and fitness improvements similar over twelve and twenty-four weeks? Journal Of Strength And Conditioning Research/National Strength & Conditioning Association. 2006, 20:130135.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Murphy M, Nevill A, Neville C, Biddle S, Hardman A: Accumulating brisk walking for fitness, cardiovascular risk, and psychological health. Medicine And Science In Sports And Exercise. 2002, 34:14681474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Murtagh EM, Boreham CAG, Nevill A, Hare LG, Murphy MH: The effects of 60 minutes of brisk walking per week, accumulated in two different patterns, on cardiovascular risk. Preventive Medicine. 2005, 41:9297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Donnelly J, Jacobsen DJ, Heelan KS, Seip R, Smith S: The effects of 18 months of intermittent vs. continuous exercise on aerobic capacity, body weight and composition, and metabolic fitness in previously sedentary, moderately obese females. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000, 24:566572.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Elizabeth Linke M.S., M.P.H..

About this article

Cite this article

Linke, S.E., Gallo, L.C. & Norman, G.J. Attrition and Adherence Rates of Sustained vs. Intermittent Exercise Interventions. ann. behav. med. 42, 197–209 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-011-9279-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-011-9279-8

Keywords

Navigation