Skip to main content
Log in

Physical Activity and Stages of Change: A Longitudinal Test in Types 1 and 2 Diabetes Samples

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

The transtheoretical model's (TTM's) ability to predict physical activity stage transitions that incorporates all social-cognitive constructs from the original model has not been conducted among adults with diabetes. The purpose of this study was to test the capacity of the TTM for predicting physical activity stage transitions among adults (≥18 years of age) with type 1 (N = 517) or type 2 (N = 1,157) diabetes over 6 months. Participants were identified by a random-digit dialing telephone protocol through the Alberta Diabetes Registry. Assessments of TTM's stage of physical activity behavior change, self-efficacy, pros and cons, cognitive Processes of Change, and behavioral Processes of Change at baseline (time 1) and 6 months (time 2) were assessed by questionnaire. Over this time period, participants were categorized as having regressed (moved back at least one stage), remained (no stage change), or progressed (moved forward at least one stage). Baseline TTM constructs were analyzed for their ability to predict transition over 6 months. Moderate support for the TTM constructs in predicting physical activity stage transitions was found. Self-efficacy, pros, and behavioral Processes of Change hold relatively strong predictive power for stage progression over 6 months, with very few differences found between the types 1 and 2 diabetes groups. The capacity of the model in predicting stage transition is partially supported. When promoting physical activity among adults with diabetes, targeting self-efficacy, pros, and cognitive Processes of Change may favorably support stage transition in the pre-action stages, while strategies to enhance the behavioral Processes of Change may be appropriate for the Action and Maintenance stages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hays LM, Clark DO. Correlates of physical activity in a sample of older adults with type 2 diabetes. Diab Care. 1999;22(5):706-712.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lin EH, Katon W, Von Korff M, et al. Relationship of depression and diabetes self-care, medication adherence, and preventive care. Diab Care. 2004;27(9):2154-2160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Morrato EH, Hill JO, Wyatt HR, Ghushchyan V, Sullivan PW. Physical activity in U.S. adults with diabetes and at risk for developing diabetes, 2003. Diab Care. 2007;30(2):203-209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nelson KM, Reiber G, Boyko EJ. Diet and exercise among adults with type 2 diabetes: Findings from the third national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Diab Care. 2002;25(10):1722-1728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nothwehr F, Stump T. Health-promoting behaviors among adults with type 2 diabetes: Findings from the health and retirement study. Prev Med. 2000;30:407-414.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Plotnikoff RC, Taylor LM, Wilson PM, et al. Factors associated with physical activity in Canadian adults with diabetes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(8):1-9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Plotnikoff RC. Physical activity in the management of diabetes: Population-based issues and approaches. Can J Diabetes. 2006;30:52-62.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rathmann W, Gianni G. Global prevalence of diabetes: Estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Response to Wild et al. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(10):2568-2569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baranowski T. Why combine diet and physical activity in the same international research society? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2004;1(1):2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Michie S, Abraham C. Interventions to change health behaviours: Evidence-based or evidence-inspired? Psychol Health. 2004;19(1):29-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rothman AJ. Is there nothing more practical than a good theory?: Why innovations and advances in health behavior change will arise if interventions are used to test and refine theory. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2004;1(11):1-7.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sutton S. Stage theories of health behaviour. In: Conner M, Norman PC, eds. Predicting Health Behaviour. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2005:223-275.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kreuter MW, Holt CL. How do people process health information? Applications in an age of individualized communication. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2001;10(6):206-209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Weinstein ND, Rothman AJ, Sutton SR. Stage theories of health behavior: Conceptual and methodological issues. Health Psychol. 1998;17(3):290-299.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992;47(9):1102-1114.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51(3):390-395.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marshall SJ, Biddle SJH. The transtheoretical model of behavior change: A meta-analysis of applications to physical activity and exercise. Ann Behav Med. 2001;23(4):229-246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosen CS. Is the sequencing of change processes by stage consistent across health problems? A meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2000;19(6):593-604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Janis IL, Mann L. Decision making. New York: Free Press; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Prochaska JO, Velicier WF, Rossi JS, et al. Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. Health Psychol. 1994;13(1):39-46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Adams J, White M. Why don't stage-based activity promotion interventions work? Health Educ Res. 2005;2:237-243.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Brug J, Conner M, Harré N, Kremers S, McKellar S, Whitelaw S. The Transtheoretical Model and stages of change: A critique: Observations by five commentators on the paper by Adams, J. and White, M. (2004) why don't stage-based activity promotion interventions work? Health Educ Res. 2005;20(2):244-258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hutchinson A, Breckon J, Johnston LH. Physical activity behavior change interventions based on the Transtheoretical Model: A systematic review. Health Educ Beh. 2008;36:829-845. doi:10.1177/1090198108318491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Plotnikoff RC, Hotz SB, Birkett NJ Couneya KS. Exercise and the transtheoretical model: A longitudinal test of a population sample. Prev Med. 2001;33(5):441-452.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nigg C. Explaining adolescent exercise behavior change: A longitudinal application of the transtheoretical model. Ann Behav Med. 2001;23(1):11-20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dallow CB, Anderson J. Using self-efficacy and a transtheoretical model to develop a physical activity intervention for obese women. Am J Health Promot. 2003;17(6):373-381.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee. Canadian Diabetes Association 2003 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Diabetes in Canada. Can J Diabetes. 2003;27:s1-s140.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Plotnikoff R, Lippke S, Courneya K, Birkett N, Sigal R. Physical activity and social-cognitive theory: A test in a population sample of adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Appl Psychol: An International Review. 2008;57(4):628-643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Plotnikoff RC, Lippke S, Courneya K, Birkett N, Sigal R. Physical activity and diabetes: An application of the theory of planned behavior to explain physical activity among type 1 and type 2 diabetes in an adult population sample. Psychol Health. 2010;25(1):7-23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Plotnikoff RC, Lippke S, Trinh L, Courneya KS, Birkett N, Sigal R. Protection Motivation Theory and the prediction of physical activity among adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes in a large population sample. Br J Health Psychol. 2009; doi:10.1348/135910709X478826). Advance Access: November 13, 2009.

  32. Statistics Canada. Census 2001 - 2B. Ottawa, Ontario: Health Canada; 2001:1-32.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Plotnikoff RC, Brez S, Brunet S. Are exercise social-cognitive factors and behaviours different for adults with diabetes? A randomized community sample. Psychol Health Med. 2003;8(4):465-471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Plotnikoff RC, Brez S, Hotz SB. Exercise behavior in a community sample with diabetes: Understanding the determinants of exercise behavioral change. Diab Educ. 2000;26(3):450-459.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Plotnikoff R, Lippke S, Reinbold-Matthews M, et al. Assessing the validity of a stage measure on physical activity in a population-based sample of individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2007;11(2):73-91.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Health Canada. Handbook for Canada’s physical activity guide to healthy active living. Ottawa, Ontario (Contains a 2-page pullout guide.) Available at: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/pau-uap/fitness/pdf/handbook_eng.pdf. Accessed 10 January 2010.

  37. Plotnikoff RC, Blanchard C, Hotz S, Rhodes R. Validation of the decisional balance scales in the exercise domain from the transtheoretical model: A longitudinal test. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2001;5(4):191-206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lippke S, Plotnikoff RC. The Protection Motivation Theory within the stages of the Transtheoretical Model—Stage-specific interplay of variables and prediction of stage transitions. Br J Health Psychol. 2009;14(2):211-229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheorectical model of health behaviour change. Am J Health Promot. 1997;12(1):38-48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Prochaska JO, Norcross JC, DiClemente CC. Changing for good. New York: Avon; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  41. McKenna J, Francis C. Exercise contemplators: Unravelling the processes of change. Health Educ. 2003;103(1):41-53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wiedemann AU, Lippke S, Reuter T, Schüz B, Ziegelmann JP, Schwarzer R. Prediction of stage transitions in fruit and vegetable intake. Health Educ Res. 2009;24(4):596-607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Canadian Diabetes Association and the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. RCP is supported by a Salary Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Applied Public Health Chair Program). KSC is supported by the Canadian Research Chair Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald C. Plotnikoff Ph.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Plotnikoff, R.C., Lippke, S., Johnson, S.T. et al. Physical Activity and Stages of Change: A Longitudinal Test in Types 1 and 2 Diabetes Samples. ann. behav. med. 40, 138–149 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9193-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9193-5

Keywords

Navigation