Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using Action Planning to Promote Exercise Behavior

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background

Action planning promotes exercise behavior and mediates intention–behavior relationships.

Purpose

The aim of this study is to provide correlational and experimental tests of action planning as mediator of intention–exercise behavior relationships controlling for Theory of Planned Behavior variables and past behavior.

Methods

In study 1 (N = 777), young adults completed questionnaires assessing Theory of Planned Behavior variables, past behavior, and planning in relation to exercise and 2 weeks later reported exercise behavior. In study 2 (N = 356), young adults were randomly allocated to complete one of two questionnaires and 2 weeks later reported exercise behavior. Both questionnaires contained similar measures to study 1 (Theory of Planned Behavior variables, past behavior in relation to exercise), but one also contained an exercise planning measure.

Results

Planning partially mediated intention–behavior relationships and intentions showed a moderated mediation effect: stronger intention–planning–behavior relationships when intentions were strong (study 1). Exercise behavior was higher in planning compared to no planning group, and this difference was greater when intentions were strong (study 2).

Conclusions

Action planning mediates intention–exercise behavior relationships, particularly when exercise intentions are strong. Interventions promoting exercise behavior should jointly target intentions and planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Department of Health. The health of the nation. London: HMSO; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010. Washington, DC; 2000.

  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Physical activity trends: United States—1990–1998. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2001; 50: 166-169.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. General household survey. London: HMSO; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991; 50: 179-211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Maddux JE, Rogers RW. Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1983; 19: 469-479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Conner M, Norman P, eds. Predicting health behaviour. 2nd ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Conner M, Sparks P. The theory of planned behaviour and health behaviours. In: Conner M, Norman P, eds. Predicting health behaviour. 2nd ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2005:170-222.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schwarzer R. Self-efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors: Theoretical approaches and a new model. In: Schwarzer R, ed. Self-efficacy: thought control of action. London: Hemisphere; 1992:217-243.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Edwards JR, Lambert LS. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods. 2007; 12: 1-22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2007; 71: 431-449.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Armitage CJ, Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology. 2001; 40: 471-499.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD, Biddle SJH. A meta-analytic review of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior in physical activity: Predictive validity and the contribution of additional variables. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2002; 24: 3-32.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hausenblas HA, Carron AV, Mack DE. Application of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior to exercise behavior: A meta-analysis. J Sport and Exer Psychol. 1997; 19: 36-51.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Webb TL, Sheeran P. Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin. 2006; 132: 249-268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sheeran P. Intention–Behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. In: Stroebe W, Hewstone M, eds. European Review of Social Psychology, vol. 12. Chichester: Wiley; 2002:1-36.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gollwitzer PM. Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. The American Psychologist. 1999; 54: 493-503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gollwitzer P, Sheeran P. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 2006; 38: 69-119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Prestwich A, Lawton R, Conner M. The use of implementation intentions and a decision balance sheet in promoting exercise behaviour. Psychology & Health. 2003; 18: 707-721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sheeran P, Milne S, Webb TL, Gollwitzer PM. Implementation intentions and health behaviours. In: Conner M, Norman P, eds. Predicting health behaviour. 2nd ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2005:276-323.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Luszczynska A, Schwarzer R. Planning and self-efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of breast self-examination: A longitudinal study of self-regulatory cognitions. Psychology & Health. 2003; 18: 93-108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ajzen I. Attitudes, personality and behavior. Milton Keynes: Open University Press; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sniehotta FF, Scholz U, Schwarzer R. Bridging the intention–behaviour gap: Planning, self-efficacy, and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise. Psychology & Health. 2005; 20: 143-160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Norman P, Conner M. The Theory of Planned Behavior and exercise: Evidence for the mediating and moderating roles of planning on intention-behavior relations. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2005; 27: 488-504.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Scholz U, Schuz B, Ziegelmann JP, Lippke S, Schwarzer R. Beyond behavioural intentions: Planning mediates between intentions and physical activity. British Journal of Health Psychology. 2008; 13: 479-494.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schwarzer R, Schuz B, Ziegelmann JP, Lippke S, Luszczynska A, Scholz U. Adoption and maintenance of four health behaviors: Theory-guided longitudinal studies on dental flossing, seat belt use, dietary behavior, and physical activity. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2007; 33: 156-166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. White KM, Terry DJ, Hogg MA. Safer safe sex: The roles of attitudes, norms and control factors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1994; 24: 2164-2192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wiedemann AU, Schuz B, Sniehotta F, Scholz U, Schwarzer R. Disentangling the relation between intentions, planning, and behaviour: A moderated mediation analysis. Psychology & Health. 2008; 24: 67-79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Reuter T, Ziegelmann JP, Wiedemann AU, Lippke S. Dietary planning as a mediation of the intention–behavior relation: An experimental-causal-chain design. Applied Psychology. 2008; 57: 194-207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple meditation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. 2004; 36: 717-731.

    Google Scholar 

  31. MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Williams J. Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2004; 39: 99-128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Conner M, Rodgers W, Murray T. Conscientiousness and the intention–behavior relationship: Predicting exercise behavior. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2007; 29: 518-533.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Taylor N, Lawton R, Conner M. Cross validation of different measures of exercise behavior. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  34. Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sherman SJ. On the self-erasing nature of errors of prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1980; 39: 211-221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sprott DE, Spangenberg ER, Block LG, Fitzsimons GJ, Morwitz VG, Williams P. The question–behavior effect: What we know and where we go from here. Soc Influence. 2006; 1: 128-137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Godin G, Sheeran P, Conner M, Germain M. Asking questions changes behavior: Mere measurement effects on frequency of blood donation. Health Psychology. 2008; 27: 179-184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Williams P, Block LG, Fitzsimons GJ. Simply asking questions about healthy behaviors increases both healthy and unhealthy behaviors. Soc Influence. 2006; 1: 117-127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sandberg T, Conner M. A mere measurement effect for anticipated regret: Impacts on cervical screening attendance. Brit J Social Psychol. 2009; 48: 221-236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Milne S, Orbell S, Sheeran P. Combining motivational and volitional interventions to promote exercise participation: Protection motivation theory and implementation intentions. British Journal of Health Psychology. 2002; 7: 163-184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sheeran P, Webb TL, Gollwitzer PM. The interplay between goal intentions and implementation intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2005; 31: 87-98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Miller DJ, Freedson PS, Klines GM. Comparison of activity levels using the Caltrac accelerometer and five questionnaires. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1994; 26: 376-382.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Michie S, Abraham C. Interventions to change health behaviours: Evidence-based or evidence-inspired? Psychology & Health. 2004; 19: 29-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK

    Mark Conner B.Sc., Ph.D. & Tracy Sandberg B.Sc., Ph.D.

  2. University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

    Paul Norman B.Sc., Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Mark Conner B.Sc., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tracy Sandberg B.Sc., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul Norman B.Sc., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Conner B.Sc., Ph.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Conner, M., Sandberg, T. & Norman, P. Using Action Planning to Promote Exercise Behavior. ann. behav. med. 40, 65–76 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9190-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9190-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation