Abstract
Background
Few studies have explored the relationship between weight bias and weight loss treatment outcomes.
Purpose
This investigation examined the relationship between implicit and explicit weight bias and (a) program attrition, (b) weight loss, (c) self-monitoring adherence, (d) daily exercise levels and overall caloric expenditure, (e) daily caloric intake, and (f) daily caloric deficit among overweight/obese treatment-seeking adults.
Methods
Forty-six overweight/obese adults (body mass index ≥ 27 kg/m2) participating in an 18-week, stepped-care, behavioral weight loss program completed implicit and explicit measures of weight bias. Participants were instructed to self-monitor and electronically report daily energy intake, exercise, and energy expenditure.
Results
Greater weight bias was associated with inconsistent self-monitoring, greater caloric intake, lower energy expenditure and exercise, creation of a smaller caloric deficit, higher program attrition, as well as less weight loss during the self-help phase of the stepped-care treatment.
Conclusions
Weight bias may interfere with overweight/obese treatment-seeking adults' ability to achieve optimal health.
References
Puhl RM, Heuer CA. The stigma of obesity: A review and update. Obesity. 2009;17:1-24.
Puhl RM, Andreyeva T, Brownell KD. Perceptions of weight discrimination: Prevalence and comparison to race and gender discrimination in America. Int J Obes. 2008;32:992-1000.
Ashmore JA, Friedman KE, Reichmann SK, Musante GJ. Weight-based stigmatization, psychological distress, & binge eating behavior among obese treatment-seeking adults. Eat Behav. 2008;9:203-209.
Wang SS, Brownell KD, Wadden TA. The influence of the stigma of obesity on overweight individuals. Int J Obes. 2004;28:1333-1337.
Rudman LA, Feinburg J, Fairchild K. Minority members' implicit attitudes: Automatic ingroup bias as a function of group status. Social Cogn. 2002;20:294-320.
Dovidio JF, Kawakami K, Gaertner SL. Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;82:62-68.
Wilson TD, Lindsey S, Schooler TY. A model of dual attitudes. Psychol Rev. 2000;107:101-126.
Wansink B, Sobal J. Mindless eating: The 200 daily food decisions we overlook. Environ Behav. 2007;39:106-122.
Puhl RM, Schwartz M, Brownell KD. Impact of perceived consensus on stereotypes about obese people: A new approach for reducing bias. Health Psychol. 2005;24:517-525.
Poehlman TA, Uhlmann EL, Greenwald AG. Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009;in press.
Aarts H, Custers R, Holland RW. The nonconscious cessation of goal pursuits: When goals and negative affect are coactivated. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007;92:165-178.
Brownell KD. The LEARN Program for weight management. 10th ed. Dallas: American Health; 2004.
Carels RA, Konrad KK, Young KM, et al. Taking control of your personal eating and exercise environment: A weight maintenance program. Eat Behav. 2008;9:228-237.
Teachman BA, Brownell KD. Implicit anti-fat bias among health professionals: Is anyone immune? Int J Obes. 2001;25:1525-1531.
Pambianco G, Wing R, Robertson R. Accuracy and reliability of the Caltrac accelerometer for estimating energy expenditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;33:858-862.
Carels RA, Young KM, Coit C, Clayton AM, Spencer A, Hobbs M. Can following the caloric restriction recommendations from the Dietary Guidelines for Americans help individuals lose weight? Eat Behav. 2008;9:328-335.
Teixeira P, Going SB, Sardinha LB, Lohman TG. A review of psychosocial pretreatment predictors of weight control. Eat Behav. 2005;6:43-45.
Grover VP, Keel PK, Mitchell JP. Gender differences in implicit weight identity. Int J Eat Disord. 2003;34:125-135.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Carels, R.A., Young, K.M., Wott, C.B. et al. Weight Bias and Weight Loss Treatment Outcomes in Treatment-Seeking Adults. ann. behav. med. 37, 350–355 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-009-9109-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-009-9109-4