Skip to main content
Log in

Is a Meta-Analysis Following Common Meta-Analytical Procedures Going Awry? A Response to Coyne, Thombs, and Hagedoorn

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Coyne JC, Thomas BD, Hagedoorn M. A meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for cancer patients gone awry. Annals Behav Med. 2009; 37: 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zimmermann T, Heinrichs N, Baucom DH. Does one size fit all? Moderators in psychosocial interventions for breast cancer patients. A meta-analysis. Annals Behav Med. 2007; 34(3): 225–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gaston-Johansson F, Fall-Dickson JM, Nanda J. The effectiveness of the comprehensive coping strategy program on clinical outcomes in breast cancer autologous bone marrow transplantation. Cancer Nurs. 2000; 23: 277–285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Meyer TJ, Mark MM. Effects of psychosocial interventions with adult cancer patients: A meta-analysis of randomized experiments. Health Psychol. 1995; 14(2): 101–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McQuellon RP, Wells M, Hoffman S, et al. Reducing distress in cancer patients with an orientation programm. Psycho-Oncol. 1998; 7: 207–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fawzy F, Fawzy N, Hyun C, Wheeler J. Brief, coping-oriented therapy for patients with malignant melanoma. In: Spira J, ed. Group therapy for medically ill patients. New York: Guilford Press; 1997: 133–164.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Manne SL, Girasek D, Ambrosino J. An evaluation of the impact of a cosmetics class on breast cancer patients. J Psychosoc Oncol. 1994; 121/2: 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bijmold T, Rik G. Meta-analysis in marketing when studies contain multiple measurements. Mark Lett. 2001; 12: 157–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalaian H, Raudenbush S. A multivariate mixed linear model for meta-analysis. Psychol. Methods. 1996(1): 227–235.

  10. Lipsey M. Identifying potentially interesting variables and analysis opportunities. In: Cooper H, Hedges L, eds. The handbook of research synthesis. New York, NY: Russell Sage; 1994: 111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marín-Martínez F, Sánchez-Meca J. Averaging dependent effect sizes in meta-analysis: A cautionary note about procedures. The Spanish Journal of Psychology. 1999(2): 32–38.

  12. Nowak C, Heinrichs N. A comprehensive meta-analysis of Triple P-Positive Parenting Program using hierarchical linear modeling: Effectiveness and moderating variables. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2008; 11: 114–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Helgeson VS, Cohen S, Schulz R, Yasko J. Education and peer discussion group interventions and adjustment to breast cancer. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999; 56: 340–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wells ME, McQuellon RP, Hinkle JS, Cruz JM. Reducing anxiety in newly diagnosed cancer patients: a pilot program. Cancer Pract. 1995; 3(2): 100–104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Giese-Davis J, Koopman C, Butler LD, et al. Change in emotion-regulation strategy for women with metastatc breast cancer following supportive-expressive group therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002; 70(4): 916–925.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Classen C, Butler LD, Koopman C, et al. Supportive-expressive group therapy and distress in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001; 58: 494–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Maguire P, Tait A, Brooke M, et al. Effect of counselling on the psychiatric morbidity associated with mastectomy. Br Med J. 1980; 281: 1454–1456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Maguire P, Brooke M, Tait A, et al. The effect of counselling on physical disabiliy and social recovery after mastectomy. Clinical Oncol. 1983; 9(4): 319–324.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Goodwin PJ, Leszcz M, Ennis M, et al. The effect of group psychosocial support on survival in metastatic breast cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2001; 345(24): 1719–1726.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Goodwin PJ, Leszcz M, Koopmans J, et al. Randomized trial of group psychosocial support in metastatic breast cancer: the BEST study. Cancer Treat Rev. 1996; 22(Suppl. A): 91–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bordeleau L, Szalai JP, Ennis M, et al. Quality of life in a randomiszed trial of group psychosocial support in metastatic breast cancer: Overall effects of the intervention and an exploration of missing data. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21(10): 1944–1951.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nezu AM, Nezu CM, Felgoise SH, et al. Project Genesis: Assessing the efficacy of problem-solving therapy for distressed adult cancer patients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003; 71(6): 1036–1048.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanja Zimmermann Ph.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Zimmermann, T., Heinrichs, N. & Baucom, D.H. Is a Meta-Analysis Following Common Meta-Analytical Procedures Going Awry? A Response to Coyne, Thombs, and Hagedoorn. ann. behav. med. 37, 97–100 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9076-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9076-1

Keywords

Navigation