Skip to main content
Log in

Longitudinal Analysis of a Model to Predict Quality of Life in Prostate Cancer Patients and their Spouses

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background/Purpose

This study examined a stress-coping model to assess whether baseline antecedent variables predicted subsequent appraisal and how that appraisal predicted coping and quality of life for prostate cancer patients and their spouses.

Methods

In a sample of 121 prostate cancer patient/spouse dyads, we assessed baseline antecedent variables (self-efficacy, current concerns, age, socioeconomic status, social support, communication, symptoms, phase of illness), 4-month follow-up appraisal (negative appraisal, hopelessness, uncertainty), and 8-month follow-up coping and mental and physical quality of life. Patients and spouses were assessed in a single integrated path model using structural equation modeling.

Results

The stress-coping model accounted for a significant amount of variance in mental and physical quality of life at 8 months for patients (40% and 34%, respectively) and spouses (43% and 24%, respectively). Appraisal mediated the effect of several antecedent variables on quality of life. In addition, several partner effects (e.g., spouse variables influencing patient outcomes) were found.

Conclusions

Prostate cancer patients need interventions that assist them to manage the effects of their disease. The stress-coping model suggests skills in several areas that could be improved. Programs need to include spouses because they also are negatively affected by the disease and can influence patient outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Control CfD. Estimated New Cancer Cases and Deaths By Sex for All Sites, US, 2006. Atlanta: National Center for Health Statistics, Center for Disease Control and Prevention; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lazarus RS. Stress and Emotion: A New Synthesis. New York: Springer; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lazarus RS, Folkman S, eds. Stress, Appraisal, And Coping. New York: Springer; 1984.

  4. Schag CA, Ganz PA, Wing DS, Sim MS, Lee JJ. Quality of life in adult survivors of lung, colon and prostate cancer. Qual Life Res. 1994; 3: 127–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosenfield B, Roth AJ, Gandhi S, Penson D. Differences in health-related quality of life of prostate cancer patients based on stage of cancer. Psychooncology. 2004; 13: 800–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wei JT, Dunn RL, Sandler HM. Comprehensive comparison of health-related quality of life after contemporary therapies for localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20: 557–556.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kornblith AB, Herr HW, Ofman US, Scher HI, Holland JC. Quality of life of patients with prostate cancer and their spouses. The value of a data base in clinical care. Cancer. 1994; 73: 2791–2802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Campbell LC, Keefe FJ, McKee DC. Prostate cancer in African Americans: Relationship of patient and partner self-efficacy to quality of life. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004; 28: 433–444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Low CA, Stanton AL, Thompson MA, Kwan L, Ganz PA. Contextual life stress and coping strategies as predictors of adjustment to breast cancer survivorship. Ann Behav Med. 2006; 32: 235–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stanton AL, Danoff-Burg S, Cameron CL. Emotionally expressive coping predicts psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000; 68: 875–882.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stanton A, Danoff-Burg S, Huggins ME. The first year after breast cancer diagnosis: Hope and coping strategies as predictors of adjustment. Psychooncology. 2002; 11: 93–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hack TF, Degner LF. Coping responses following breast cancer diagnosis predict psychological adjustment three years later. Psychooncology. 2004; 13: 235–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bower JE, Meyerowitz BE, Desmond KA. Perceptions of positive meaning and vulnerability following breast cancer: Predictors and outcomes among long-term breast cancer survivors. Ann Behav Med. 2005; 29: 236–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Golden-Kreutz DM, Thornton LM, Wells-Di Gregorio S. Traumatic stress, perceived global stress, and life events: Prospectively predicting quality of life in breast cancer patients. Health Psychol. 2005; 24: 288–296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schou I, Ekeberg O, Ruland CM, Sandvik RL, Karesen R. Pessimism as a predictor of emotional morbidity one year following breast cancer surgery. Psychooncology. 2004; 13: 309–320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Eton DT, Lepore SJ, Helgeson VS. Psychological distress in spouses of men treated for early-stage prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2005; 103: 2412–2418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ko CM, Malcarne VL, Varni JW. Problem-solving and distress in prostate cancer patients and their spousal caregivers. Support Care Cancer. 2005; 13: 367–374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Malcarne VL, Banthia R, Varni JW, Sadler GR, Greenbergs HJ, Ko CM. Problem-solving skills and emotional distress in spouses of men with prostate cancer. J Cancer Educ. 2002; 17: 150–154.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cliff AM, MacDonagh RP. Psychosocial morbidity in prostate cancer: II. A comparison of patients and partners. BJU Intl. 2000; 86: 834–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lepore SJ, Helgeson V. Social constraints, intrusive thoughts, and mental health after prostate cancer. J Soc Clin Psychol. 1998; 17: 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Northouse LL, Mood D, Templin T, Mellon S, George T. Couples’ patterns of adjustment to colon cancer. Soc Sci Med. 2000; 50: 271–284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Northouse LL, Templin T, Mood D. Couples’ adjustment to breast disease during the first year following diagnosis. J Behav Med. 2001; 24: 115–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Northouse LL, Mood D, Kershaw T. Quality of life of women with recurrent breast cancer and their family members. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20: 4050–4064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Northouse LL, Rossett T, Phillips L. Research with families facing cancer: The challenge of accrual and retention. Res Nurs Health. 2006; 29: 199–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Northouse LL, Mood DW, Montie JE. Living with prostate cancer: Patients’ and spouses’ psychosocial status and quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 4171–4177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Northouse LL, Mood DW, Schafenacker A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of a family intervention for prostate cancer patients and their spouses. Cancer. 2007; 110: 2809–2818.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996; 34: 220–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Carver CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: Consider the Brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997; 4: 92–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kershaw T, Northouse L, Kritpracha C, Schafenacker A, Mood D. Coping strategies and quality of life in women with advanced breast cancer and their family caregivers. Psychol Health. 2004; 19: 139–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Oberst MT. Appraisal of Illness Scale: Manual for Use. Detroit: Wayne State University; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Oberst MT. Appraisal of Caregiving Scale: Manual for Use. Detroit: Wayne State University; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Beck AT, Weissman A, Lester D, Trexler L. The measurement of pessimism: The hopelessness scale. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1974; 42: 861–865.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mishel M, Epstein D. Uncertainty in Illness Scales: Manual. Tucson: University of Arizona; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mood DW, Streater A. Assessing Cancer Patients' Risk for Distress. Midwest Nursing Research Conference. Milwaukee, WI; 1994: 129.

  35. Lewis FM. Family Home Visitation Study Final Report. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health; 1996.

  36. Weinert C, ed. Measuring Social Support: PRQ 2000. New York: Springer.

  37. Mood D, Bickes J. Strategies to enhance self-care in radiation therapy. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1989; 16: 143.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Campbell L, Kashy DA. Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A user-friendly guide. Pers Relat. 2002; 9: 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kashy DA, Kenny DA. The Analysis of Data from Dyads and Groups. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic Data Analysis. New York: Guilford; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jaccard J, Wan CK. Lisrel Approaches to Interaction Effects in multiple Regression. Newbury Park: Sage; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Loehlin JC. Latent Variable Models: An Introduction to Factor, Path, and Structural Analysis. 3rd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kornblith AB, Herndon JE, Zuckerman E. The impact of docetaxel, estramustine, and low dose hydrocortisone on the quality of life of men with hormone refractory prostate cancer and their partners: A feasibility study. Ann Oncol. 2001; 12: 633–641.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Roberts KJ, Lepore SJ, Helgeson V. Social-cognitive correlates of adjustment to prostate cancer. Psychooncology. 2006; 15: 183–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Helgeson V, Novak SA, Lepore SJ, Eton DT. Spouse social control efforts: Relations to health behavior and well-being among men with prostate cancer. J Soc Pers Relat. 2004; 21: 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Schulz R, Beach SR. Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: The caregiver health effects study. JAMA. 1999; 282: 2215–2219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hollingshead AB, Redlich FC. Social Class and Mental Illness: A Community Study. New York: Wiley; 1958.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trace S. Kershaw Ph.D..

Additional information

Grant support: R01CA90739 from NCI (L. Northouse PI).

About this article

Cite this article

Kershaw, T.S., Mood, D.W., Newth, G. et al. Longitudinal Analysis of a Model to Predict Quality of Life in Prostate Cancer Patients and their Spouses. ann. behav. med. 36, 117–128 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9058-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9058-3

Keywords

Navigation