Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of a Brief Image-Based Multiple-Behavior Intervention for College Students

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background

Epidemiologic data indicate most adolescents and adults experience multiple, simultaneous risk behaviors.

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to examine the efficacy of a brief image-based multiple-behavior intervention (MBI) for college students.

Methods

A total of 303 college students were randomly assigned to: (1) a brief MBI or (2) a standard care control, with a 3-month postintervention follow-up.

Results

Omnibus treatment by time multivariate analysis of variance interactions were significant for three of six behavior groupings, with improvements for college students receiving the brief MBI on alcohol consumption behaviors, F(6, 261) = 2.73, p = 0.01, marijuana-use behaviors, F(4, 278) = 3.18, p = 0.01, and health-related quality of life, F(5, 277) = 2.80, p = 0.02, but not cigarette use, exercise, and nutrition behaviors. Participants receiving the brief MBI also got more sleep, F(1, 281) = 9.49, p = 0.00, than those in the standard care control.

Conclusions

A brief image-based multiple-behavior intervention may be useful in influencing a number of critical health habits and health-related quality-of-life indicators of college students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Southern Illinois University Carbondale. Results of the core alcohol and drug survey. Available at: http://www.siu.edu/departments/coreinst/public_html. Accessibility verified June 2, 2008.

  2. Lowery R, Galuska DA, Fulton JE, et al. Physical activity, food choice, and weight management goals and practices among U.S. college students. Am J Prev Med. 2000; 181: 18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang TTK, Harris KJ, Lee RE, et al. Assessing overweight, obesity, diet, and physical activity in college students. J Am Coll Health. 2003; 52: 83–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Keating XD, Guan J, Pinero JC, et al. A meta-analysis of college students’ physical activity behaviors. J Am Coll Health. 2005; 542: 116–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Towbes LC, Cohen LH. Chronic stress in the lives of college students: Scale development and prospective prediction of distress. J Youth Adolesc. 1996; 252: 199–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ross SE, Niebling BC, Heckert TM. Sources of stress among college students. Coll Stud J. 1999; 33: 312–317.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brown FC, Soper B, Buboltz Jr WC. Prevalence of delayed sleep phase syndrome in university students. Coll Stud J. 2001; 353: 472–476.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Buboltz Jr WC, Brown F, Soper B. Sleep habits and patterns of college students: A preliminary study. J Am Coll Health. 2001; 503: 131–135.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Buboltz WC, Loveland J, Jenkins SM, et al. College student sleep: Relationship to health and academic performance. In: Landow MV, ed. College students: Mental health and coping strategies. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science; 2006: 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jensen DR. Understanding sleep disorders in a college student population. J Coll Couns. 2003; 61: 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krenek RL Jr. The impact of sleep quality and duration on college student adjustment and health. Ph.D. dissertation, Louisiana Tech University, United States—Louisiana. 2006 Retrieved October 18, 2007, from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. AAT 3203243).

  12. Grunbaum JA, Kann L, Kinchen S, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2003. Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 2004; 532: 1–95.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eaton D, Kann L, Kinchen S, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2005. J Sch Health. 2006; 76: 353–372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Albright, CL, ed. Call for papers for a special issue to appear in preventive medicine: Conceptualizing multiple health risk behavior research. Outlook: A quarterly newsletter of the Society of Behavioral Medicine. Fall 2006:14.

  15. National Institutes of Health. Enhancing adolescent health promotion across multiple high risk behaviors: Program Announcement. Available at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-02-159.html. Accessibility verified June 2, 2008.

  16. Society of Behavioral Medicine. Special interest groups: Multiple risk behavior change. Available at http://www.sbm.org/sig/mrbc/. Accessibility verified June 26, 2008.

  17. Prochaska JJ, Sallis JF. A randomized controlled trial of single versus multiple health behavior change: Promoting physical activity and nutrition among adolescents. Health Psychol. 2004; 233: 314–318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dunn C, Deroo L, Rivera FP. The use of brief interventions adapted from motivational interviewing across behavioral domains: A systematic review. Addiction. 2001; 9612: 1725–1742.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Little P, Kelly J, Barnett J, et al. Randomised controlled factorial trial of dietary advice for patients with a single high blood pressure reading in primary care. Brit Med J. 2004; 3287447: 1054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Petterson TL, Shaw WS, Semple SJ. Reducing the sexual risk behaviors of HIV+ individuals: outcome of a randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med. 2003; 252: 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Clark M, Hampson SE, Avery L, Simpson R. Effects of a tailored lifestyle self-management intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes. Br J Health Psychol. 2004; 93: 365–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lisson GL, Ridrigue JR, Reed AI, Nelson DR. A brief psychological intervention to improve adherence following transplantation. Ann Transplant. 2005; 101: 52–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Werch CE, Grenard JL, Burnett JL, et al. Translation as a function of modality: The potential of brief interventions. Eval Health Prof. 2006; 291: 89–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. D’Amico EJ, Fromme K. Brief prevention for adolescent risk-taking behavior. Addiction. 2002; 97: 563–574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Amos A, Gray D, Currie C, et al. Healthy or druggy? Self-image, ideal image and smoking behaviour among young people. Soc Sci Med. 1997; 456: 847–858.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gray D, Amos A, Currie C. Decoding the image-consumption, young people, magazines and smoking: An exploration of theoretical and methodological issues. Health Educ Res. 1997; 124: 505–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Slovic P, Fincuane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG. The affect heuristic. In: Gilovich T, Griffin D Kahneman D, eds. Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2002: 397–420.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gibbons FX, Gerrard M. Health images and their effects on health behaviour. In: Buunk BP, Gibbons FX, eds. Health, coping, and well-being: Perspectives from social comparison theory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1997: 63–94.

    Google Scholar 

  29. McCool JP, Cameron L, Petrie K. Stereotyping the smoker: Adolescents’ appraisals of smokers in film. Tob Control. 2004; 133: 308–314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pechmann C. A comparison of health communication models: Risk learning versus stereotype priming. Media Psychol. 2001; 32: 189–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wheeler SC, Petty RE. The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: A review of possible mechanisms. Psychol Bull. 2001; 1276: 797–826.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gibbons FX, Gerrard M. Predicting young adults’ health risk behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995; 693: 505–517.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hooker K, Kaus CR. Possible selves and health behaviors in later life. J Aging Health. 1992; 43: 390–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Oysterman D, Terry K, Bybee D. A possible selves intervention to enhance school involvement. J Adolesc. 2002; 25: 313–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Freeman MA, Hennessy EV, Marzullo DM. Defensive evaluation of antismoking messages among college-age smokers: The role of possible selves. Health Psychol. 2001; 20: 424–433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Strathman A, Boninger DS, Gleicher F, Baker SM. Constructing the future with present behavior: An individual difference approach. In: Zaleski Z, ed. Psychology of future orientation. Lublin, Poland: Catholic University of Lubin; 1994: 107–119.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Werch C, Moore M, DiClemente CC, et al. A sport-based intervention for preventing alcohol use and promoting physical activity. J Sch Health. 2003; 7310: 380–388.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Werch CE, Moore MJ, DiClemente CC. A multi-health behavior intervention integrating physical activity and substance use prevention for adolescents. Prev Sci. 2005; 63: 213–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Werch C. The behavior-image model: A paradigm for integrating prevention and health promotion in brief interventions. Health Educ Res. 2007; 225: 677–690.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Werch C, Bian H, Moore MJ, et al. Brief multiple behavior interventions in a college student health care clinic. J Adolesc Health. 2007; 41: 577–585.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Koestner R, Lekes N, Powers TA, et al. Attaining personal goals: Self-concordance plus implementation intentions equals success. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002; 831: 231–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Martin KA, Leary MR. Single, physically active, female: The effects of information about exercise participation and body weight on perceptions of young women. Soc Behav Pers. 2001; 162: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Krames. Fitness [brochure]. Yardley, PA: Krames; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Werch C. Fitness and health survey [survey]: Phase II trial. Jacksonville, FL: University of Florida, Addictive and Health Behaviors Research Institute; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  45. SurveyMonkey.com. Available at www.surveymonkey.com. Accessibility verified June 2, 2008.

  46. Botvin GJ, Baker E, Renick N, et al. A cognitive-behavioral approach to substance abuse prevention. Addict Behav. 1984; 9: 137–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Eggert L, Thompson E, Herting J, et al. Preventing adolescent drug abuse and high school dropout through an intensive school-based social network development program. Am J Health Promot. 1994; 83: 202–215.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ellickson P, Hays R. Beliefs about resistance self-efficacy and drug prevalence: Do they really affect drug use? Int J Addict. 1991; 2511A: 1353–1378.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Johnson CA, Pentz MA, Weber MD, et al. Relative effectiveness of comprehensive community programming for drug abuse prevention with high-risk and low-risk adolescents. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1990; 584: 447–456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. State and local youth risk behavior. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/YRBS/pdfs/2005highschoolquestionaire.pdf. Accessibility verified June 2, 2008.

  51. Gruenwald P, Johnson F, Treno A. Outlets, drinking and driving: A multilevel analysis of availability. J Stud Alcohol. 2002; 634: 460–468.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Godin G, Shepard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985; 10: 141–146.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. U.S Departments of Health and Human Services, and Agriculture. Dietary guidelines for Americans 2005. Available at: http://www.healthierus.gov/dietaryguidelines/. Accessibility verified June 2, 2008.

  54. Gallant M, Dorn G. Gender and race differences in the predictors of daily health practices among older adults. Health Educ Res. 2001; 161: 21–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Groeger JA, Zijlstra FRH, Dijk DJ. Sleep quantity, sleep difficulties and their perceived consequences in a representative sample of some two thousand British adults. J Sleep Res. 2004; 134: 359–371.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Wolfson A, Crowley S, Anwer U, et al. Changes in sleep patterns and depressive symptoms in first-time mothers: Last trimester to 1-year postpartum. Behav Sleep Med. 2003; 11: 54–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Chen MY, Wang EK, Yang RJ, et al. Adolescent health promotion scale: Development and psychometric testing. Public Health Nurs. 2003; 20: 104–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Zullig KJ, Valois RF, Huebner ES, et al. Evaluating the performance of the Center for Disease Control’s Health-related Quality of Life scales among adolescents. Public Health Rep. 2004; 119: 577–584.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. SPSS, Inc. SPSS 13.0 for Windows. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Morris SB. Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs. Organ Res Methods. 2008; 112: 364–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Marcus B, Williams D, Dubbert P, et al. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommitte on Physical Activity); Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; and the Interdisciplinary Working Group on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Circulation. 2006; 114: 2739–2752.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Sallis JF, McKenzie TL, Conway TL, Elder JP, Prochaska JJ, Brown M, et al. Environmental interventions for eating and physical activity: A randomized controlled trial in middle schools. Am J Prev Med. 2003; 243: 209–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Brener ND, Billy JOG, Grady WR. Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: Evidence from the scientific literature. J Adolesc Health. 2003; 33: 436–457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Brener ND, Kann L, McManus T, et al. Reliability of the 1999 Youth Risk Behavior Survey Questionnaire. J Adolesc Health. 2002; 31: 336–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. el Boca F, Darkes J. The validity of self reports of alcohol consumption: state of the science and challenges for research. Addiction. 2003; 982: S1–S12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Komro KA, Perry CL, Munson KA, et al. Reliability and validity of self-report measures to evaluate drug and violence prevention programs. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2004; 133: 17–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Williams RJ, Nowatzki N. Validity of adolescent self-report of substance use. Subst Use Misuse. 2005; 40: 299–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This manuscript was supported in part by funding from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (grant #DA018872). We thank Dr. Fred Beck, MD, who made it possible to use the campus medical services to recruit students, and Drs. Pamela Chally, Ph.D., and Judy Perkin, Ph.D., who permitted us to implement the intervention in the Brooks College of Health. We also thank Elizabeth Breting, Heather Frost, and Heather Boggess for their assistance in implementing this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chudley E. Werch Ph.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Werch, C.E., Moore, M.J., Bian, H. et al. Efficacy of a Brief Image-Based Multiple-Behavior Intervention for College Students. ann. behav. med. 36, 149–157 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9055-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9055-6

Keywords

Navigation