Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Use of Theory in Health Behavior Research from 2000 to 2005: A Systematic Review

  • Rapid Communication
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background

Theory-based health behavior change programs are thought to be more effective than those that do not use theory. No previous reviews have assessed the extent to which theory is used (that is, operationalized and tested) in empirical research.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to describe theory use in recent health behavior literature and to assess the proportion of research that uses theory along a continuum from: informed by theory to applying, testing, or building theory.

Methods

A sample of empirical research articles (n = 193) published in ten leading public health, medicine, and psychology journals from 2000 to 2005 was coded to determine whether and how theory was used.

Results

Of health behavior articles in the sample, 35.7% mentioned theory. The most-often-used theories were The Transtheoretical Model, Social Cognitive Theory, and Health Belief Model. Most theory use (68.1%) involved research that was informed by theory; 18% applied theory; 3.6% tested theory; and 9.4% sought to build theory.

Conclusions

About one third of published health behavior research uses theory and a small proportion of those studies rigorously apply theory. Patterns of theory use are similar to reports from the mid-1990s. Behavioral researchers should strive to use theory more thoroughly by applying, testing, and building theories in order to move the field forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA. 2004; 291: 1238–1245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Solomon S, Kington R. National efforts to promote behavior-change research: views from the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research. Health Educ Res. 2002; 17: 495–499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Vander Hoorn S, Murray CJ. Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. Lancet. 2002; 360: 1347–1360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1996.

  5. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002.

  6. Rothman AJ. “Is there nothing more practical than a good theory?”: Why innovations and advances in health behavior change will arise if interventions are used to test and refine theory. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2004; 1: 11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Suls J, Rothman A. Evolution of the biopsychosocial model: prospects and challenges for health psychology. Health Psychol. 2004; 23: 119–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Noar SM, Zimmerman RS. Health Behavior Theory and cumulative knowledge regarding health behaviors: are we moving in the right direction. Health Educ Res. 2005; 20: 275–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ratner PA, Bottorff JL, Johnson JL, Cook R, Lovato CY. A meta-analysis of mammography screening promotion. Cancer Detect Prev. 2001; 25: 147–160.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Baranowski T, Lin LS, Wetter DW, Resnicow K, Hearn MD. Theory as mediating variables: Why aren’t community interventions working as desired. Ann Epidemiol. 1997; 7: S89–S95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1990.

  12. Oldenburg BF, Ffrench ML, Sallis JF. Health behavior research: the quality of the evidence base. Am J Health Promot. 2000; 14: 253–257.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Oldenburg BF, Sallis JF, Ffrench ML, Owen N. Health promotion research and the diffusion and institutionalization of interventions. Health Educ Res. 1999; 14: 121–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Parkerson GR Jr, Connis RT, Broadhead WE, et al. Disease-specific versus generic measurement of health-related quality of life in insulin-dependent diabetic patients. Med Care. 1993; 31: 629–639.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Weinstein ND. Misleading tests of health behavior theories. Ann Behav Med. 2007; 33: 1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. DiClemente RJ, Crosby RA, Kegler MC, eds. Emerging Theories in Health Promotion Practice and Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002.

  17. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33: 159–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Community Guide. Evidence-based recommendations for programs and policies to promote population health. Available at http://www.thecommunityguide.org/. Accessibility verified December 8, 2007.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd, NE, Rm 530, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA

    Julia E. Painter M.P.H., Christina P. C. Borba M.P.H., Michelle Hynes M.P.H., Darren Mays M.P.H. & Karen Glanz Ph.D, M.P.H.

Authors
  1. Julia E. Painter M.P.H.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christina P. C. Borba M.P.H.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michelle Hynes M.P.H.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Darren Mays M.P.H.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Karen Glanz Ph.D, M.P.H.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Glanz Ph.D, M.P.H..

About this article

Cite this article

Painter, J.E., Borba, C.P.C., Hynes, M. et al. The Use of Theory in Health Behavior Research from 2000 to 2005: A Systematic Review. ann. behav. med. 35, 358–362 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9042-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9042-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation