Skip to main content
Log in

Promoting Fruit and Vegetable Intake through Messages Tailored to Individual Differences in Regulatory Focus

  • Rapid Communication
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background

Researchers must identify strategies to optimize the persuasiveness of messages used in public education campaigns encouraging fruit and vegetable (FV) intake.

Purpose

This study examined whether tailoring messages to individuals’ regulatory focus (RF), the tendency to be motivated by promotion versus prevention goals, increased the persuasiveness of messages encouraging greater FV intake.

Method

Participants (n = 518) completed an assessment of their RF and were randomly assigned to receive either prevention- or promotion-oriented messages. Messages were mailed 1 week, 2 months, and 3 months after the baseline interview. Follow-up assessments were conducted 1 and 4 months after the baseline assessment.

Results

Regression analyses revealed that at Month 4, the messages were somewhat more efficacious when congruent with participants’ RF.

Conclusion

RF may be a promising target for developing tailored messages promoting increased FV intake, and particularly for encouraging individuals to meet FV guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pomerleau J, Lock K, Knai C, McKee M. Interventions designed to increase adult fruit and vegetable intake can be effective: a systematic review of the literature. J Nutr. 2005; 135: 2486–2495.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Centers for Disease Control. Fruit and vegetable consumption among adults—United States, 2005. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2007; 56: 213–217.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brawley LR, Latimer AE. Physical activity guides for Canadians: messaging strategies, realistic expectations for change, and evaluation. Can J Public Health. 2007; 98Suppl 2: s170–s184.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cantor N, Kihlstrom JF. Personality and social intelligence. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Latimer AE, Rivers SE, Rench TA et al. A field experiment testing the utility of regulatory fit messages for promoting physical activity. J Exp Soc Psycho. 2008; 44: 826–832.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Updegraff J, Sherman DK, Luyster FS, Mann T. The effects of message quality and congruency on perceptions of tailored health communications. J Exp Soc Psycho. 2007; 43: 249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Spiegel S, Grant-Pillow H, Higgins ET. How regulatory fit enhances motivational strength during goal pursuit. Eur J Soc Psycho. 2004; 34: 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Higgins ET. Promotion and prevention: regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Adv Exp Soc Psycho. 1998; 30: 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Squiers L, Treiman K. The cancer information service research agenda. Available at http://cis.nci.nih.gov/research/research.html. Access verified March 31, 2008.

  10. Williams-Piehota P, Pizarro J, Navarro Silvera S, Mowad L, Salovey P. Need for cognition and message complexity in motivating fruit and vegetable intake among callers to the Cancer Information Service. Health Commun. 2006; 19: 75–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Higgins ET, Friedman RS, Harlow RE, Idson LC, Ayduk ON, Taylor A. Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: promotion pride versus prevention pride. Eur J of Soc Psycho. 2001; 31: 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Block G, Hartman AM, Dresser CM, Carroll MD, Gannon J, Gardner L. A data-based approach to diet questionnaire design and testing. Am J Epidemiol. 1986; 124: 453–469.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ajzen I. From intentions to action a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J, eds. Action control: from cognition to behavior. Heidelberg: Springer; 1985: 11–39.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Serdula M, Coates R, Byers T, et al. Evaluation of a brief telephone questionnaire to estimate fruit and vegetable consumption in diverse study populations. Epidemiol. 1993; 4: 455–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marcus AC, Heimendinger J, Wolfe P, et al. A randomized trial of a brief intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake: a replication study among callers to the CIS. Prev Med. 2001; 33: 204–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. Applied and multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Flay BR. Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Prev Med. 1986; 15: 451–474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psycho Bull. 2007; 133: 673–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J of Consult and Clin Psycho. 1983; 51: 390–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Steinhauser KE, Clipp EC, Hays JC, et al. Identifying, recruiting, and retaining seriously-ill patients and their caregivers in longitudinal research. Palliat Med. 2006; 20: 745–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement of Research Support

Research reported in this article was funded by the National Cancer Institute through a grant to Peter Salovey (R01-CA68427) and a contract to the Yale Cancer Center (NO2-CO-01002-75).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Amy E. Latimer Ph.D. or Peter Salovey Ph.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Latimer, A.E., Williams-Piehota, P., Katulak, N.A. et al. Promoting Fruit and Vegetable Intake through Messages Tailored to Individual Differences in Regulatory Focus. ann. behav. med. 35, 363–369 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9039-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9039-6

Keywords

Navigation