Skip to main content
Log in

Lifetime Characteristics of Participants and Non-participants in a Smoking Cessation Trial: Implications for External Validity and Public Health Impact

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background

Detailed information about the characteristics of smokers who do and do not participate in smoking cessation treatment is needed to improve efforts to reach, motivate, and treat smokers.

Purpose

The aim of this study is to explore a broad range of characteristics related to participation in a smoking cessation trial.

Methods

Eligible smokers were recruited from a longitudinal birth cohort. Participants and non-participants were compared on a broad range of sociodemographics, smoking, psychiatric and substance abuse disorders, personality, and prospective measures from early childhood. Eligible smokers were compared to a matched regional subsample of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).

Results

Few differences were observed, most of which were statistically significant but not clinically meaningful. Compared to non-participants, participants were more likely to be single, have lower income, be more nicotine-dependent, be more motivated to quit, and have higher levels of depressed mood and stress even after covariance of gender, income, and marital status. Sociodemographic differences between participants and the BRFSS sample reflect the skew toward lower socioeconomic status in the original birth cohort.

Conclusions

The encouraging conclusion is that smokers who enroll in cessation trials may not differ much from non-participants. Information about treatment participants can inform the development of recruitment strategies, improve the tailoring of treatment to individual smoker profiles, help to estimate potential selection bias, and improve estimates of population impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrams DB, Orleans CT, Niaura RS, et al. Integrating individual and public health perspectives for treatment of tobacco dependence under managed health care: a combined stepped-care and matching model. Ann Behav Med. 1996; 18: 290–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cigarette smoking among adults—United States, 2004. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005; 54: 1121–1124.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhu S, Melcer T, Sun J, Rosbrook B, Pierce JP. Smoking cessation with and without assistance: a population-based analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2000; 18: 305–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cokkinides VE, Ward E, Jemal A, Thun MJ. Under-use of smoking-cessation treatments: results from the National Health Interview Survey, 2000. Am J Prev Med. 2005; 28: 119–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McDonald PW. Population-based recruitment for quit-smoking programs: an analytic review of communication variables. Prev Med. 1999; 28: 545–557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Glasgow RE, Klesges RC, Klesges LM, Somes GR. Variables associated with participation and outcome in a worksite smoking control program. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988; 56: 617–620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Linnan LA, Emmons KM, Klar N, et al. Challenges to improving the impact of worksite cancer prevention programs: comparing reach, enrollment, and attrition using active versus passive recruitment strategies. Ann Behav Med. 2002; 24: 157–166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mak YW, Loke AY, Lam TH, Abdullah AS. Predictors of the participation of smoking parents in a proactive telephone-based smoking cessation program. Addict Behav. 2006; 31: 1731–1743.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Holtrop JS, Wadland WC, Vansen S, Weismantel D, Fadel H. Recruiting health plan members receiving pharmacotherapy into smoking cessation counseling. Am J Manag Care. 2005; 11: 501–507.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pisinger C, Vestbo J, Borch-Johnsen K, Thomsen T, Jorgensen T. Acceptance of the smoking cessation intervention in a large population-based study: the Inter99 study. Scand J Public Health. 2005; 33: 138–145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fortmann SP, Killen JD. Who shall quit? Comparison of volunteer and population-based recruitment in two minimal-contact smoking cessation studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1994; 140: 39–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pohl JM, Martinelli A, Antonakos C. Predictors of participation in a smoking cessation intervention group among low-income women. Addict Behav. 1998; 23: 699–704.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Klesges RC, Brown K, Pascale RW, et al. Factors associated with participation, attrition, and outcome in a smoking cessation program at the workplace. Health Psychol. 1988; 7: 575–589.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kviz FJ, Crittenden KS, Warnecke RB. Factors associated with nonparticipation among registrants for a self-help, community-based smoking cessation intervention. Addict Behav. 1992; 17: 533–542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Velicer WF, Keller S, Friedman RH, et al. Comparing participants and nonparticipants recruited for an effectiveness study of nicotine replacement therapy. Ann Behav Med. 2005; 29: 181–191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gritz ER, Berman BA, Bastani R, Wu M. A randomized trial of a self-help smoking cessation intervention in a nonvolunteer female population: testing the limits of the public health model. Health Psychol. 1992; 11: 280–289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brod MI, Hall SM. Joiners and non-joiners in smoking treatment: a comparison of psychosocial variables. Addict Behav. 1984; 9: 217–221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahluwalia JS, Richter K, Mayo MS, et al. African American smokers interested and eligible for a smoking cessation clinical trial: predictors of not returning for randomization. Ann Epidemiol. 2002; 12: 206–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89: 1322–1327.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Glasgow RE, McCaul KD, Fisher KJ. Participation in worksite health promotion: a critique of the literature and recommendations for future practice. Health Educ Q. 1993; 20: 391–408.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abrams DB, Leslie F, Mermelstein R, Kobus K, Clayton RR. Transdisciplinary tobacco use research. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003; 5Suppl 1: S5–S10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Niswander KR, Gordon M. The Women and Their Pregnancies: The Collaborative Perinatal Study of the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke. Washington: National Institute of Health; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Broman SH. The collaborative perinatal project: an overview. In: Mednick SA, Harway M, Finello KM, eds. Handbook of Longitudinal Research. New York: Praeger; 1984: 182–215.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerstrom KO. The Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom tolerance questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991; 86: 1119–1127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Piper ME, Piasecki TM, Federman EB, et al. A multiple motives approach to tobacco dependence: The Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (WISDM-68). J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004; 72: 139–154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Biener L, Abrams DB. The contemplation ladder: validation of a measure of readiness to consider smoking cessation. Health Psychol. 1991; 10: 360–365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Abrams DB, Biener L. Motivational characteristics of smokers at the workplace: a public health challenge. Prev Med. 1992; 21: 679–687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Curry SJ, Grothaus L, McBride C. Reasons for quitting: intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for smoking cessation in a population-based sample of smokers. Addict Behav. 1997; 22: 727–739.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992; 47: 1102–1114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Buka SL, Shenassa ED, Niaura R. Elevated risk of tobacco dependence among offspring of mothers who smoked during pregnancy: a 30-year prospective study. Am J Psychiatry. 2003; 160: 1978–1984.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Radloff LS. A new self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977; 1: 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Anda RF, Williamson DF, Escobedo LG, et al. Depression and the dynamics of smoking. A national perspective. JAMA. 1990; 264: 1541–1545.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983; 24: 385–396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cohen S, Lichtenstein E, Prochaska JO, et al. Debunking myths about self-quitting. Evidence from 10 prospective studies of persons who attempt to quit smoking by themselves. Am Psychol. 1989; 44: 1355–1365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  37. World Health Organization. Composite International Diagnostic Interview Computer Programs. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wittchen HU. Reliability and validity studies of the WHO–Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): a critical review. J Psychiatr Res. 1994; 28: 57–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wittchen HU, Robins LN, Cottler LB, et al. Cross-cultural feasibility, reliability and sources of variance of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). The Multicentre WHO/ADAMHA Field Trials. Br J Psychiatry. 1991; 159: 645–653, 658.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Dierker LC, Donny E, Tiffany S, et al. The association between cigarette smoking and DSM-IV nicotine dependence among first year college students. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007; 86: 106–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Andrews G, Peters L, Guzman AM, Bird K. A comparison of two structured diagnostic interviews: CIDI and SCAN. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1995; 29: 124–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Robins LN, Helzer JE, Croughan J, Ratcliff KS. National institute of mental health diagnostic interview schedule. Its history, characteristics, and validity. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981; 38: 381–389.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Buka SL. “Learning Disabled Children Grown Up:” Natural history from birth through adulthood. DIS Newsletter. 1999; Winter.

  44. Murphy K, Barkley RA. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder adults: comorbidities and adaptive impairments. Compr Psychiatry. 1996; 37: 393–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Tellegen A. Brief Manual for the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Krueger RF, Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Silva PA, McGee R. Personality traits are differentially linked to mental disorders: a multitrait-multidiagnosis study of an adolescent birth cohort. J Abnorm Psychol. 1996; 105: 299–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. McGue M, Slutske W, Taylor J, Iacono WG. Personality and substance use disorders: I. Effects of gender and alcoholism subtype. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1997; 21: 513–520.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wechsler D. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. New York: The Psychological Corporation; 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  49. SAS/STAT Software. Changes and Enhancements. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Shadel WG, Shiffman S, Niaura R, Nichter M, Abrams DB. Current models of nicotine dependence: what is known and what is needed to advance understanding of tobacco etiology among youth. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000; 59Suppl 1: S9–S22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Etter JF. Comparing the efficacy of two Internet-based, computer-tailored smoking cessation programs: a randomized trial. J Med Internet Res. 2005; 7: e2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Pomerleau CS, Carton SM, Lutzke ML, Flessland KA, Pomerleau OF. Reliability of the Fagerstrom tolerance questionnaire and the Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence. Addict Behav. 1994; 19: 33–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hitsman B, Borrelli B, McChargue DE, Spring B, Niaura R. History of depression and smoking cessation outcome: a meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003; 71: 657–663.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Borrelli B, Bock B, King T, Pinto B, Marcus BH. The impact of depression on smoking cessation in women. Am J Prev Med. 1996; 12: 378–387.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Cinciripini PM, Wetter DW, Fouladi RT, et al. The effects of depressed mood on smoking cessation: mediation by postcessation self-efficacy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003; 71: 292–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Niaura R, Britt DM, Shadel WG, et al. Symptoms of depression and survival experience among three samples of smokers trying to quit. Psychol Addict Behav. 2001; 15: 13–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Berlin I, Covey LS. Pre-cessation depressive mood predicts failure to quit smoking: the role of coping and personality traits. Addiction. 2006; 101: 1814–1821.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Buka SL, Tsuang MT, Lipsitt LP. Pregnancy/delivery complications and psychiatric diagnosis. A prospective study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993; 50: 151–156.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhu SH, Anderson CM, Tedeschi GJ, et al. Evidence of real-world effectiveness of a telephone quitline for smokers. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 1087–1093.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Lancaster T, Stead LF. Individual behavioural counselling for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005; CD001292.

  61. Stead LF, Lancaster T. Group behaviour therapy programmes for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005; CD001007.

  62. Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Vogt TM. Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs: using the RE-AIM framework to form summary measures for decision making involving complex issues. Health Educ Res. 2006; 21: 688–694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kerner J, Rimer B, Emmons K. Introduction to the special section on dissemination: Dissemination research and research dissemination: How can we close the gap? Health Psychol. 2005; 24: 443–446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Graham AL, Bock BC, Cobb NK, Niaura R, Abrams DB. Characteristics of smokers reached and recruited to an internet smoking cessation trial: a case of denominators. Nicotine Tob Res. 2006; 8Suppl 1: S43–S48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science conference statement. Tobacco use: Prevention, cessation, and control. Ann Intern Med. 2006; 145: 839–844.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by (or in part by) the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Center (TTURC) Award (P50 CA084719), the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. We thank Ms. Barbara Doll and Ms. Susan Marx for their assistance in preparing the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. L. Graham Ph.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Graham, A.L., Papandonatos, G.D., DePue, J.D. et al. Lifetime Characteristics of Participants and Non-participants in a Smoking Cessation Trial: Implications for External Validity and Public Health Impact. ann. behav. med. 35, 295–307 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9031-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9031-1

Keywords

Navigation