Skip to main content
Log in

Stress and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Recurrence: Moderation or Mediation of Coping?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background/Purpose

Diagnosis with breast cancer recurrence often brings high levels of stress. Successful coping to alleviate stress could improve patients’ quality of life (QoL). The intervening role coping plays between stress and QoL may depend on the types of stress encountered and the types of coping strategies used. The present study investigates the longitudinal relationships between stress, coping, and mental health QoL.

Methods

Breast cancer patients recently diagnosed with recurrence (N = 65) were assessed shortly after the diagnosis and 4 months later. Four moderation and four mediation models were tested using hierarchical multiple regressions and path analyses. In the models, either traumatic stress or symptom-related stress at recurrence diagnosis was a predictor of mental health QoL at follow-up. Both engagement and disengagement coping strategies were tested as moderators or mediators between stress and QoL.

Results

Engagement coping moderated the effect of symptom stress on mental health QoL, whereas disengagement coping mediated the effects of both traumatic stress and symptom stress on mental health QoL.

Conclusion

The findings imply that interventions teaching engagement coping strategies would be important for patients experiencing high symptom stress, while discouraging the use of disengagement coping strategies would be important for all patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Okamura M, Yamawaki S, Akechi T, Taniguchi K, Uchitomi Y. Psychiatric disorders following first breast cancer recurrence: Prevalence, associated factors and relationship to quality of life. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2005; 35: 302–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hotopf M, Chidgey J, Addington-Hall J, Ly KL. Depression in advanced disease: A systematic review. Part 1. Prevalence and case finding. Palliat Med. 2002; 16: 81–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mahon SM, Cella DF, Donovan MI. Psychosocial adjustment to recurrent cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1990; 17: 47–52, discussion 53–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Folkman S, Lazarus RS. Coping and Emotion. In: Monat A, Lazarus RS, eds. Stress and Coping: An Anthology. New York: Columbia University Press; 1991: 207–227.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Andersen BL, Shapiro CL, Farrar WB, Crespin T, Wells-DiGregorio S. Psychological responses to cancer recurrence: A controlled prospective study. Cancer. 2005; 104: 1540–1547.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lutgendorf SK, Anderson B, Rothrock N, et al. Quality of life and mood in women receiving extensive chemotherapy for gynecologic cancer. Cancer. 2000; 89: 1402–1411.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sprangers MAG, Tempelaar R, van den Heuvel WJA, de Haes HCJM. Explaining quality of life with crisis theory. Psycho-oncology. 2002; 11: 419–426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Golden-Kreutz DM, Thornton LM, Wells-DiGregorio S, et al. Traumatic stress, perceived global stress, and life events: Prospectively predicting quality of life in breast cancer patients. Health Psychol. 2005; 24: 288–296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lazarus RS. Coping theory and research: Past, present, and future. Psychosom Med. 1993; 55: 234–247.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Perczek RE, Burke MA, Carver CS, Krongrad A, Terris MK. Facing a prostate cancer diagnosis: Who is at risk for increased distress? Cancer. 2002; 94: 2923–2929.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Roesch SC, Adams L, Hines A, et al. Coping with prostate cancer: A meta-analytic review. J Behav Med. 2005; 28: 281–293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rogers ME, Hansen NB, Levy BR, Tate DC, Sikkema KJ. Optimism and coping with loss in bereaved HIV-infected men and women. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2005; 24: 341–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen M. Coping and emotional distress in primary and recurrent breast cancer patients. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2002; 9: 245–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Carver CS, Pozo C, Harris SD, et al. How coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress: A study of women with early stage breast cancer. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993; 65: 375–390.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Heim E, Valach L, Schaffner L. Coping and psychosocial adaptation: Longitudinal effects over time and stages in breast cancer. Psychosom Med. 1997; 59: 408–418.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cordova MJ, Giese-Davis J, Golant M, et al. Mood disturbance in community cancer support groups: The role of emotional suppression and fighting spirit. J Psychosom Res. 2003; 55: 461–467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nordin K, Glimelius B. Reactions to gastrointestinal cancer: Variation in mental adjustment and emotional well-being over time in patients with different prognoses. Psycho-oncology. 1998; 7: 413–423.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ransom S, Jacobsen PB, Schmidt JE, Andrykowski MA. Relationship of problem-focused coping strategies to changes in quality of life following treatment for early stage breast cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005; 30: 243–253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jim HS, Richardson SA, Golden-Kreutz DM, Andersen BL. Strategies used in coping with a cancer diagnosis predict meaning in life for survivors. Health Psychol. 2006; 25: 753–761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McCaul KD, Sandgren AK, King B, et al. Coping and adjustment to breast cancer. Psycho-oncology. 1999; 8: 230–236.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. The Concept of Coping. In: Monat A, Lazarus RS, eds. Stress and Coping: An Anthology. New York: Columbia University Press; 1991: 189–206.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986; 51: 1173–1182.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schroder KEE. Coping competence as predictor and moderator of depression among chronic disease patients. J Behav Med. 2004; 27: 123–145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schou I, Ekeberg O, Ruland CM. The mediating role of appraisal and coping in the relationship between optimism-pessimism and quality of life. Psycho-oncology. 2005; 14: 718–727.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kershaw T, Northouse L, Kritpracha C, Schafenacker A, Mood D. Coping strategies and quality of life in women with advanced breast cancer and their family caregivers. Psychol Health. 2004; 19: 139–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Horowitz MJ, Wilner N, Alvarez W. Impact of Events Scale: A measure of subjective stress. Psychosom. Med. 1979; 41: 209–218.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Horowitz MJ. Stress response syndromes and their treatment. In: Goldberger L, Breznitz S, eds. Handbook of Stress: Theoretical and Clinical Aspects. New York: Free Press; 1982: 711–732.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Moinpour CM, Feigl P, Metch B, et al. Quality of life end points in cancer clinical trials: Review and recommendations. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989; 81: 485–495.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH. The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: Macleod CM, ed. Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents. New York, NY: Columbial; 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mor V, Laliberte L, Morris JN, Wiemann M. The Karnofsky Performance Status Scale: An examination of its reliability and validity in a research setting. Cancer. 1984; 53: 2002–2007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yates JW, Chalmer B, McKegney FP. Evaluation of patients with advanced cancer using the Karnofsky Performance Status. Cancer. 1980; 45: 2220–2224.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Daut RL, Cleeland CS, Flanery RC. Development of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases. Pain. 1983; 17: 197–210.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hann DM, Jacobsen PB, Azzarello LM, et al. Measurement of fatigue in cancer patients: Development and validation of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory. Qual Life Res. 1998; 7: 301–310.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Carver CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: Consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997; 4: 92–100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992; 30: 473–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Arbuckle JL. Amos 5.0 [Computer software]. In: SPSS, ed. Chicago, IL: SPSS; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociol Methods Res. 1992; 21: 230–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990; 107: 238–246.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Meth Instrum Comput. 2004; 36: 717–731.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shrout PE, Bolger N. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychol Methods. 2002; 7: 422–445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: McGraw-Hill.; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Vos MS, de Haes JCJM. Denial in cancer patients, an explorative review. Psycho-oncology. 2007; 16: 12–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures for African Americans. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank the participants in the Stress and Immunity Breast Cancer Project and the professional and research staff. Special thanks to Dr. Lisa Thornton, Dr. Wendy Blakely, and Dr. Timothy Crespin for comments. This research was supported by the following: American Cancer Society (PBR-89, RSGPB-03–248–01-PBP), Longaberger Company-American Cancer Society Grant for Breast Cancer Research (PBR-89A), U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity Grants (DAMD17–94-J-4165, DAMD17–96–1–6294, DAMD17–97–1–7062), National Institutes of Mental Health (1 R01 MH51487), the National Cancer Institute (K05 CA098133, R01 CA92704), the General Clinical Research Center (M01-RR0034), and The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center (P30 CA16058).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara L. Andersen Ph.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, HC., Brothers, B.M. & Andersen, B.L. Stress and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Recurrence: Moderation or Mediation of Coping?. ann. behav. med. 35, 188–197 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9016-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9016-0

Keywords

Navigation