Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling production planning and transient clearing functions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Logistics Research

Abstract

The production planning problem, that is, to determine the production rate of a factory in the future, requires an aggregate model for the production flow through a factory. The canonical model is the clearing function model based on the assumption that the local production rate instantaneously adjusts to the one given by the equilibrium relationship between production rate (flux) and work in progress (wip), for example, characterized by queueing theory. We will extend current theory and modeling for transient clearing functions by introducing a continuum description of the flow of product through the factory based on a partial differential equation model for the time evolution of the wip-density and the production velocity. It is shown that such a model improves the mismatch between models for transient production flows and discrete event simulations significantly compared to other clearing function approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abate J, Whitt W (1991) Transient behavior of the M/G/1 workload process. Oper Res 42(4):750–764

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Aouam T, Uzsoy R (2012) An exploratory analysis of production planning in the face of stochastic demand and workload-dependent lead times. In: Armbruster D, Kempf K (eds) Decision policies for production systems. Springer, London, pp 173–209

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Armbruster D, Marthaler D, Ringhofer C, Kempf K, Jo T-C (2006) A continuum model for a re-entrant factory. Oper Res 54(5):933–950

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Armbruster D, Marthaler D, Ringhofer C (2004) Kinetic and fluid model hierarchies for supply chains. SIAM Multiscale Model. Simul 2(1):43–61

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Armbruster D (2012) The production planning problem: clearing functions, variable leads times, delay equations and partial differential equations. In: Armbruster D, Kempf K (eds) Decision policies for production systems. Springer, London, pp 289–302

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Asmundsson JM, Rardin RL et al (2009) Production planning models with resources subject to congestion. Naval Res Logist 56:142–157

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Berstimas D, Mourtzinou G (1997) Transient laws of non-stationary queueing systems and their applications. Queueing Syst 25:115–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bramson M (2008) Stability of queueing networks, lecture notes in mathematics, 1950. Springer, Berlin

  9. Karmarkar US (1989) Capacity loading and release planning with work-in- progress (wip) and lead-times. J Manuf Oper Manag 2:105–123

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lighthill MJ, Whitham GB (1955) On kinematic waves. II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads. Proc R Soc Lond A 229:317–345

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Missbauer H (2010) Order release planning with clearing functions: a queueing-theoretical analysis of the clearing function concept. Int J Prod Econ. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.09.003

  12. Wiendahl H-P (1995) Load oriented manufacturing control. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was started when D.A. was a part time professor at the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology. Helpful discussions with Erjen Lefeber and Ivo Adan on transient queueing models are gratefully acknowledged. Discussions with Hubert Missbauer and Reha Uzsoy helped to clarify the experiments on transient queuing and the relationship between clearing function models and the production planning problem. This research was supported by a grant from the Volkswagen Foundation under the program on Complex Networks.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dieter Armbruster.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Armbruster, D., Fonteijn, J. & Wienke, M. Modeling production planning and transient clearing functions. Logist. Res. 5, 133–139 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-012-0087-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-012-0087-8

Keywords

Navigation