Abstract
Maize (Zea mays L.) grain is an important feedstock for the ethanol-producing industry. However, little is known about the optimum grain quality for optimizing ethanol yielding efficiencies. We specifically investigated the response of ethanol yields (L Mg−1) to kernel hardness, and its physiological determinant endosperm zein protein profiles, as affected by genotype selection, field nitrogen (N) fertilization, and crop growth environment. We measured ethanol yield and related this to different kernel hardness indicators, kernel composition, and zein profiles. We also described changes in field ethanol yield (L ha−1), by taking into account the crop yield (Mg ha−1). Hard endosperm genotypes always yielded less ethanol than softer endosperm ones per grain mass (L Mg−1). Higher N fertilization rates increased kernel hardness and decreased ethanol yield (L Mg−1) on soft endosperm dented genotypes but had no effect on hard endosperm ones. Ethanol yield was negatively correlated with kernel density, kernel protein concentration, and Z1 and Z2 zein fractions. Within Z2, 15 kDa β-zein explained the largest ethanol yield variation generated by genotypes, N fertilizations, and growth environments. However, and although these differences were as large as 10%, ethanol field yield (L ha−1) was mainly driven by crop yields (r 2 0.98) due to the large crop yield (Mg ha−1) differences observed across treatments. Together, our results helped describe the magnitude that changes in maize kernel hardness can have over ethanol yield, both through genotype selection or crop management. A particular Z2 zein protein rises as relevant for future genetic manipulations of maize ethanol yield determination.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wang H, Wang T, Johnson LA, Pometto AL III (2008) Effect of the corn breaking method on oil distribution between stillage phases of dry-grind corn ethanol production. J Agric Food Chem 56:9975–9980
Ramchandran D, Johnston DB, Tumbleson ME, Rausch KD, Singh V (2015) Seasonal variability in ethanol concentrations from a dry grind fermentation operation associated with incoming corn variability. Ind Crop Prod 67:155–160
Srichuwong S, Gutesa J, Blanco M, Duvick SA, Gardner C, Jane J (2010) Characterization of corn grains for dry-grind ethanol production. J ASTM Int 7:1–10
Naidu K, Singh V, Johnston DB, Rausch KD, Tumbleson ME (2007) Effects of ground corn particle size on ethanol yield and thin stillage soluble solids. Cereal Chem 84:6–9
Lacerenza JA, Martin JM, Talbert LE, Lanning SP, Giroux MJ (2008) Relationship of ethanol yield to agronomic and seed quality characteristics of small grains. Cereal Chem 85:322–328
Zhan X, Wang D, Tuinstra MR, Bean S, Seib PA, Sun XS (2003) Ethanol and lactic acid production as affected by sorghum genotype and location. Ind Crop Prod 18:245–255
Wu X, Zhao R, Bean SR, Seib PA, McLaren JS, Madl RL, Tuinstra M, Lenz MC, Wang D (2007) Factors impacting ethanol production from grain sorghum in the dry-grind process. Cereal Chem 84:130–136
Singh V (2012) Effect of corn quality on bioethanol production. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 1:353–355
Singh V, Graeber JV (2005) Effect of corn hybrid variability and planting location on dry grind ethanol production. Trans ASAE 48:709–714
Dien BS, Wicklow DT, Singh V, Moreau RA, Winkler-Moser JK, Cotta MA (2012) Influence of Stenocarpella maydis infected corn on the composition of corn kernel and its conversion into ethanol. Cereal Chem 89:15–23
Gumienna M, Szwengiel A, Lasik M, Szambelan K, Majchrzycki D, Adamczyk J, Nowak J, Czarnecki Z (2016) Effect of corn grain variety on the bioethanol production efficiency. Fuel 164:386–392
Robutti JL, Borrás FS, Eyhérabide GH (1997) Zein compositions of mechanically separated coarse and fine portions of maize kernels. Cereal Chem 74:75–78
Pratt RC, Paulis JW, Miller K, Nelsen T, Bietz JA (1995) Association of zein classes with maize kernel hardness. Cereal Chem 72:162–167
Fox G, Manley M (2009) Hardness methods for testing maize kernels. J Agric Food Chem 57:5647–5657
Wilson CM (1991) Multiple zeins from maize endosperms characterized by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography. Plant Physiol 95:777–786
Lending DR, Larkins BA (1989) Changes in zein composition of protein bodies during maize endosperm development. Plant Cell 1:1011–1023
Eyhérabide GH, Robutti JL, Borrás FS (1996) Effect of near-infrared transmission-based selection on maize hardness and the composition of zeins. Cereal Chem 73:775–778
Robutti JL (1995) Maize kernel hardness estimation in breeding by near-infrared transmission analysis. Cereal Chem 72:632–636
Gerde JA, Tamagno S, Di Paola JC, Borrás L (2016) Genotype and nitrogen effects over maize kernel hardness and endosperm zein profiles. Crop Sci 56:1225–1233
Ubach MC, Jurado LA, Vinjamoori DV, Das P, Krohn B, Modiano SH (2007) Method of predicting a trait of interest. U.S. Patent Application WO 2007/118212 A1. Date issued: 18 October 2007
Tsai CY, Huber DM, Warren HL (1978) Relationship of the kernel sink for N to maize productivity. Crop Sci 18:399–404
Pearson CJ, Jacobs BC (1987) Yield components and nitrogen partitioning of maize in response to nitrogen before and after anthesis. Aust J Agric Res 38:1001–1009
Uhart SA, Andrade FH (1995) Nitrogen and carbon accumulation and remobilization during grain filling in maize under different source/sink ratios. Crop Sci 35:183–190
Tamagno S, Greco I, Almeida H, Martí Ribes F, Di Paola J, Borrás L (2016) Crop management options for maximizing maize kernel hardness. Agron J 108:1561–1570
Tsai CY, Huber DM, Glover DV, Warren HL (1984) Relationship of N deposition to grain yield and N response of three maize hybrids. Crop Sci 24:277–281
Ahmadi M, Wiebold WJ, Beuerlein JE, Kephart KD (1995) Protein quality of corn hybrids differing for endosperm characteristics and the effect of nitrogen fertilization. J Plant Nutr 18:1471–1481
Singletary GW, Doehlert DC, Wilson CM, Muhitch MJ, Below FE (1990) Response of enzymes and storage proteins of maize endosperm to nitrogen supply. Plant Physiol 94:858–864
Gambín BL, Borrás L (2005) Sorghum kernel weight: growth patterns from different positions within the panicle. Crop Sci 45:553–561
Borrás F, Seetharaman K, Yao N, Robutti JL, Percibaldi NM, Eyhérabide GH (2006) Relationship between popcorn composition and expansion volume and discrimination of corn types by using zein properties. Cereal Chem 83:86–92
Dombrink-Kurtzman MA, Bietz JA (1993) Zein composition in hard and soft endosperm of maize. Cereal Chem 70:105–108
Reicks G, Woodard HJ, Bly A (2009) Improving the fermentation characteristics of corn through agronomic and processing practices. Agron J 101:201–206
Yangcheng H, Jiang H, Blanco M, Jane J (2013) Characterization of normal and waxy corn starch for bioethanol production. J Agric Food Chem 61:379–386
Ai Y, Medic J, Jiang H, Wang D, Jane J (2011) Starch characterization and ethanol production of sorghum. J Agric Food Chem 59:7385–7392
Vidal BC, Rausch KD, Tumbleson ME, Singh V (2011) Corn endosperm fermentation using endogenous amino nitrogen generated by a fungal protease. Cereal Chem 88:117–123
Johnston DB, McAloon AJ (2014) Protease increases fermentation rate and ethanol yield in dry-grind ethanol production. Bioresour Technol 154:18–25
Acknowledgements
Funding was provided by the Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva (PICT 2013-1057). Authors want to thank S Tamagno for field help and valuable comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
ESM 1
(PDF 413 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gerde, J.A., Spinozzi, J.I. & Borrás, L. Maize Kernel Hardness, Endosperm Zein Profiles, and Ethanol Production. Bioenerg. Res. 10, 760–771 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-017-9837-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-017-9837-4