Skip to main content
Log in

Maize Kernel Hardness, Endosperm Zein Profiles, and Ethanol Production

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays L.) grain is an important feedstock for the ethanol-producing industry. However, little is known about the optimum grain quality for optimizing ethanol yielding efficiencies. We specifically investigated the response of ethanol yields (L Mg−1) to kernel hardness, and its physiological determinant endosperm zein protein profiles, as affected by genotype selection, field nitrogen (N) fertilization, and crop growth environment. We measured ethanol yield and related this to different kernel hardness indicators, kernel composition, and zein profiles. We also described changes in field ethanol yield (L ha−1), by taking into account the crop yield (Mg ha−1). Hard endosperm genotypes always yielded less ethanol than softer endosperm ones per grain mass (L Mg−1). Higher N fertilization rates increased kernel hardness and decreased ethanol yield (L Mg−1) on soft endosperm dented genotypes but had no effect on hard endosperm ones. Ethanol yield was negatively correlated with kernel density, kernel protein concentration, and Z1 and Z2 zein fractions. Within Z2, 15 kDa β-zein explained the largest ethanol yield variation generated by genotypes, N fertilizations, and growth environments. However, and although these differences were as large as 10%, ethanol field yield (L ha−1) was mainly driven by crop yields (r 2 0.98) due to the large crop yield (Mg ha−1) differences observed across treatments. Together, our results helped describe the magnitude that changes in maize kernel hardness can have over ethanol yield, both through genotype selection or crop management. A particular Z2 zein protein rises as relevant for future genetic manipulations of maize ethanol yield determination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang H, Wang T, Johnson LA, Pometto AL III (2008) Effect of the corn breaking method on oil distribution between stillage phases of dry-grind corn ethanol production. J Agric Food Chem 56:9975–9980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramchandran D, Johnston DB, Tumbleson ME, Rausch KD, Singh V (2015) Seasonal variability in ethanol concentrations from a dry grind fermentation operation associated with incoming corn variability. Ind Crop Prod 67:155–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Srichuwong S, Gutesa J, Blanco M, Duvick SA, Gardner C, Jane J (2010) Characterization of corn grains for dry-grind ethanol production. J ASTM Int 7:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  4. Naidu K, Singh V, Johnston DB, Rausch KD, Tumbleson ME (2007) Effects of ground corn particle size on ethanol yield and thin stillage soluble solids. Cereal Chem 84:6–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lacerenza JA, Martin JM, Talbert LE, Lanning SP, Giroux MJ (2008) Relationship of ethanol yield to agronomic and seed quality characteristics of small grains. Cereal Chem 85:322–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhan X, Wang D, Tuinstra MR, Bean S, Seib PA, Sun XS (2003) Ethanol and lactic acid production as affected by sorghum genotype and location. Ind Crop Prod 18:245–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu X, Zhao R, Bean SR, Seib PA, McLaren JS, Madl RL, Tuinstra M, Lenz MC, Wang D (2007) Factors impacting ethanol production from grain sorghum in the dry-grind process. Cereal Chem 84:130–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh V (2012) Effect of corn quality on bioethanol production. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 1:353–355

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh V, Graeber JV (2005) Effect of corn hybrid variability and planting location on dry grind ethanol production. Trans ASAE 48:709–714

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dien BS, Wicklow DT, Singh V, Moreau RA, Winkler-Moser JK, Cotta MA (2012) Influence of Stenocarpella maydis infected corn on the composition of corn kernel and its conversion into ethanol. Cereal Chem 89:15–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gumienna M, Szwengiel A, Lasik M, Szambelan K, Majchrzycki D, Adamczyk J, Nowak J, Czarnecki Z (2016) Effect of corn grain variety on the bioethanol production efficiency. Fuel 164:386–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Robutti JL, Borrás FS, Eyhérabide GH (1997) Zein compositions of mechanically separated coarse and fine portions of maize kernels. Cereal Chem 74:75–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pratt RC, Paulis JW, Miller K, Nelsen T, Bietz JA (1995) Association of zein classes with maize kernel hardness. Cereal Chem 72:162–167

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fox G, Manley M (2009) Hardness methods for testing maize kernels. J Agric Food Chem 57:5647–5657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson CM (1991) Multiple zeins from maize endosperms characterized by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography. Plant Physiol 95:777–786

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lending DR, Larkins BA (1989) Changes in zein composition of protein bodies during maize endosperm development. Plant Cell 1:1011–1023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Eyhérabide GH, Robutti JL, Borrás FS (1996) Effect of near-infrared transmission-based selection on maize hardness and the composition of zeins. Cereal Chem 73:775–778

    Google Scholar 

  18. Robutti JL (1995) Maize kernel hardness estimation in breeding by near-infrared transmission analysis. Cereal Chem 72:632–636

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gerde JA, Tamagno S, Di Paola JC, Borrás L (2016) Genotype and nitrogen effects over maize kernel hardness and endosperm zein profiles. Crop Sci 56:1225–1233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ubach MC, Jurado LA, Vinjamoori DV, Das P, Krohn B, Modiano SH (2007) Method of predicting a trait of interest. U.S. Patent Application WO 2007/118212 A1. Date issued: 18 October 2007

  21. Tsai CY, Huber DM, Warren HL (1978) Relationship of the kernel sink for N to maize productivity. Crop Sci 18:399–404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pearson CJ, Jacobs BC (1987) Yield components and nitrogen partitioning of maize in response to nitrogen before and after anthesis. Aust J Agric Res 38:1001–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Uhart SA, Andrade FH (1995) Nitrogen and carbon accumulation and remobilization during grain filling in maize under different source/sink ratios. Crop Sci 35:183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tamagno S, Greco I, Almeida H, Martí Ribes F, Di Paola J, Borrás L (2016) Crop management options for maximizing maize kernel hardness. Agron J 108:1561–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tsai CY, Huber DM, Glover DV, Warren HL (1984) Relationship of N deposition to grain yield and N response of three maize hybrids. Crop Sci 24:277–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ahmadi M, Wiebold WJ, Beuerlein JE, Kephart KD (1995) Protein quality of corn hybrids differing for endosperm characteristics and the effect of nitrogen fertilization. J Plant Nutr 18:1471–1481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Singletary GW, Doehlert DC, Wilson CM, Muhitch MJ, Below FE (1990) Response of enzymes and storage proteins of maize endosperm to nitrogen supply. Plant Physiol 94:858–864

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Gambín BL, Borrás L (2005) Sorghum kernel weight: growth patterns from different positions within the panicle. Crop Sci 45:553–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Borrás F, Seetharaman K, Yao N, Robutti JL, Percibaldi NM, Eyhérabide GH (2006) Relationship between popcorn composition and expansion volume and discrimination of corn types by using zein properties. Cereal Chem 83:86–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dombrink-Kurtzman MA, Bietz JA (1993) Zein composition in hard and soft endosperm of maize. Cereal Chem 70:105–108

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Reicks G, Woodard HJ, Bly A (2009) Improving the fermentation characteristics of corn through agronomic and processing practices. Agron J 101:201–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Yangcheng H, Jiang H, Blanco M, Jane J (2013) Characterization of normal and waxy corn starch for bioethanol production. J Agric Food Chem 61:379–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ai Y, Medic J, Jiang H, Wang D, Jane J (2011) Starch characterization and ethanol production of sorghum. J Agric Food Chem 59:7385–7392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vidal BC, Rausch KD, Tumbleson ME, Singh V (2011) Corn endosperm fermentation using endogenous amino nitrogen generated by a fungal protease. Cereal Chem 88:117–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Johnston DB, McAloon AJ (2014) Protease increases fermentation rate and ethanol yield in dry-grind ethanol production. Bioresour Technol 154:18–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by the Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva (PICT 2013-1057). Authors want to thank S Tamagno for field help and valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jose A. Gerde.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(PDF 413 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gerde, J.A., Spinozzi, J.I. & Borrás, L. Maize Kernel Hardness, Endosperm Zein Profiles, and Ethanol Production. Bioenerg. Res. 10, 760–771 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-017-9837-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-017-9837-4

Keywords

Navigation