Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Switchgrass Biomass and Nitrogen Yield with Over-Seeded Cool-season Forages in the Southern Great Plains

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In dry climates with long, hot summers and freezing winters, such as that of the southern Great Plains of North America, switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) has proven potential as a cellulosic bioenergy feedstock. This trial looked at dry matter (DM) and N yield dynamics of switchgrass overseeded with cool-season legumes and rye (Secale cereale L.), compared to switchgrass fertilized with 0, 56 and 112 kg N ha-1 yr-1 at an infertile and a fertile location. Optimal N fertilizer rate on switchgrass was 56 kg N ha-1 at the infertile location. Legume yield was greater in the first season after planting, compared to subsequent years where annual legumes were allowed to reseed and alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) was allowed to grow. This suggests that the reseeding model for annual legumes will not work in switchgrass swards grown for biomass unless soil seed banks are built up for more than one year, and that overseeding with alfalfa may have to be repeated in subsequent years to build up plant populations. Overseeding rye and legumes generally did not suppress or enhance switchgrass biomass production compared to unfertilized switchgrass. However, cumulative spring and fall biomass yields were generally greater due to winter and spring legume production, which could be beneficial for grazing or soil conservation systems, but not necessarily for once-yearly late autumn harvest biofuel production systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DM:

dry matter

OM:

organic matter

References

  1. Sanderson MA, Reed RL, Ocumpaugh WR, Hussey MA, van Esbroeck G, Read JC et al (1999) Switchgrass cultivars and germplasm for biomass feedstock production in Texas. Bioresour Techn 67:209–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lemus R, Brummer EC, Burras CL, Moore KJ, Barker MF, Mostad NE (2008) Effects of nitrogen fertilization on biomass yield and quality in large fields of established switchgrass in southern Iowa, USA. Biomass Bioenergy 32:1187–1194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Muir JP, Sanderson MA, Ocumpaugh WR, Jones RM, Reed RL (2001) Biomass production of ‘Alamo’ switchgrass in response to nitrogen, phosphorus, and row spacing. Agron J 93:896–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guretzky JA, Biermacher JT, Cook BJ, Kering MK, Mosali J (2011) Switchgrass for forage and bioenergy: harvest and nitrogen rate effects on biomass yields and nutrient composition. Plant Soil 339:69–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Temperton VM (2007) Positive interactions between nitrogen-fixing legumes and four different neighboring species in a biodiversity experiment. Oecologia 151:190–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gettle RM, George JR, Blanchet KM, Buxton DR, Moore KJ (1996) Frost-seeded legumes into established switchgrass: forage yield and botanical composition of the stratified canopy. Agron J 88:555–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Posler GL, Lenssen AW, Fine GL (1993) Forage yield, quality, compatibility, and persistence of warm-season grass-legume mixtures. Agron J 85:554–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bow JR, Muir JP, Weindorf DC, Rosiere RE, Butler TJ (2008) Integration of cool-season annual legumes and dairy manure compost with switchgrass. Crop Sci 48:1621–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. El Hadj M (2000) compatibility, yield and quality of perennial warm-season grass-legume mixtures. Proc Am Forage Grassl Counc AFGC Georgetown, TX 9:69–73

    Google Scholar 

  10. DeHaan LR, Weisberg S, Tilman D, Fornara D (2010) Agricultural and biofuel implications of a species diversity experiment with native perennial grassland plants. Agric Ecosyst Environ 137:33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. George JR, Blanchet KM, Gettle RM, Buxton DR, Moore KJ (1995) Yield and botanical composition of legume-interseeded vs. nitrogen-fertilized switchgrass. Agron J 87:1147–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mikkelson GM (2011) Diversity and the good. In: deLaplant K, Brown B, Peacock KA (eds) Philosophy of Ecology. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science Vol. 11. New Holland, Oxford, pp 399–415

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Tilman D, Hill J, Lehman C (2006) Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass. Science 314:1598–1600

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Braden IS (2002) Composition and special distribution of legume mixtures within warm-season grass pastures. pp 276-280. Proc Am Forage Grassl Counc AFGC Georgetown, TX 11:276–280

    Google Scholar 

  15. Springer TL, Aiken GE, McNew RW (2001) Combining ability of binary mixtures of native, warm-season grasses and legumes. Crop Sci 41:818–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Muir JP, Pitman WD (2004) Establishment of Desmanthus spp. in existing grass stands. Native Plant J 5:5–13

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wang D, Lebauer DS, Dietze MC (2010) A quantitative review comparing the yield of switchgrass in monocultures and mixtures in relation to climate and management factors. Bioenergy 2:16–25

    Google Scholar 

  18. Muir JP, Bow JR (2009) Herbage, phosphorus and nitrogen yields of winter-season forages on high-phosphorus soil. Agron J 101:764–768

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Blanchet KM, George JR, Gettle RM, Buxton DR, Moore KJ (1995) Establishment and persistence of legumes interseeded into switchgrass. Agron J 87:935–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. SAS Institute (2002) SAS Proprietary Software Version 9.1. SAS Inst, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cherr CM, Sholberg JMS, McSorley (2006) Green manure approaches to crop production: a synthesis. Agron J 98:302–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Njunie MN, Wagger MG, Luna-Orea P (2004) Residue decomposition and nutrient release dynamics from two tropical forage legumes in a Kenyan environment. Agron J 96:1073–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, 2510 Sam Noble Parkway, Ardmore, OK, 73401, USA

    Twain J. Butler & Chengjun Huo

  2. Texas AgriLife Research, Texas A&M System, 1229 N. HWY 281, Stephenville, TX, 76401, USA

    James P. Muir

  3. Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 310 Keim Hall, Lincoln, NE, 68583-0915, USA

    John A. Guretzky

Authors
  1. Twain J. Butler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James P. Muir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chengjun Huo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. John A. Guretzky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James P. Muir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Butler, T.J., Muir, J.P., Huo, C. et al. Switchgrass Biomass and Nitrogen Yield with Over-Seeded Cool-season Forages in the Southern Great Plains. Bioenerg. Res. 6, 44–52 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9225-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9225-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation