Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biomass Yield of Naturalized Populations and Cultivars of Reed Canary Grass

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reed canary grass is a widely adapted temperate grass with a circumglobal distribution in the northern hemisphere. Because it has relatively high biomass yields under relatively infrequent harvest systems, this species is receiving increasing attention as a bioenergy feedstock. The objective of this study was to conduct a comparative biomass yield evaluation of reed canary grass accessions from a wide range of habitats in the north central and northeastern USA. Eight cultivars and 72 accessions were evaluated for biomass yield over 2 years at five locations in Iowa, New York, and Wisconsin. Accessions produced, on average, 6.7% higher biomass yield than the cultivars. Cultivars ranked from 50th to 77th in biomass yield out of a total of 80 cultivars and accessions. Genetic expression for biomass yield was highly consistent across locations and years. Accessions from southern and western collection sites tended to have the highest biomass yield. Reed canary grass populations in rural landscapes of the central and northeastern USA have value for increasing biomass yield potential of this bioenergy feedstock candidate species. The high biomass yield of many of these populations, combined with the large amount of genetic variability among these populations, offers potential for both short-term gains by selecting superior accessions and long-term gains by selection and breeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Association of Official Seed Analyses (1998) Rules for seed testing. AOSA, Beltsville

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barker RE, Hovin AW, Carlson IT, Drolsom PN, Sleper DA, Ross JG et al (1981) Genotype-environment interactions for forage yield of reed canarygrass clones. Crop Sci 21:567–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carlson IT, Oram RN, Surprenant J (1996) Reed canarygrass and other Phalaris species. In: Moser LE et al (eds) Cool-season forage grasses. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, pp 569–604

    Google Scholar 

  4. Casler MD (1999) Spatial variation affects precision of perennial cool-season forage grass trials. Agron J 91:75–81

    Google Scholar 

  5. Casler MD (2009) Genetics, breeding, and ecology of reed canarygrass. Intl J Plant Breeding (in press)

  6. Casler MD, Phillips MM, Krohn AL (2009) DNA polymorphisms reveal geographic races of reed canarygrass. Crop Sci. (in press)

  7. Charles AH (1961) Differential survival of cultivars of Lolium, Dactylis, and Phleum. J Brit Grassl Soc 16:69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cherney JH, Cherney DJR, Casler MD (2003) Low-intensity harvest management of reed canarygrass. Agron J 95:627–634

    Google Scholar 

  9. Christian DG, Yates NE, Riche AB (2006) The effect of harvest date on the yield and mineral content of Phalaris arundinacea L. (reed canary grass) genotypes screened for their potential as energy crops in southern England. J Sci Food Agric 86:1181–1188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jasinskas A, Zaltauskas A, Kryzeviciene A (2008) The investigation of growing and using of tall perennial grasses as energy crops. Biomass Bioenergy 32:981–987

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lavergne S, Molofsky J (2007) Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:3883–3888

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lindvall E (1997) Breeding reed canarygrass as an energy or fibre crop by using local collected wild populations. In: Buchannan-Smith JG et al (eds) Proc. XVIII Intl. Grassl. Congr. Saskatoon, Sask., Canada Extension Service, pp 31-32

  13. Linhart YB, Grant MB (1996) Evolutionary significance of local genetic differentiation in plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 27:237–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marten GC, Clapp CE, Larson WE (1979) Effects of municipal wastewater effluent and cutting management on persistence and yield of eight pernnial forages. Agron J 71:650–658

    Google Scholar 

  15. Marten GC, Hovin AW (1980) Harvest schedule, persistence, yield, and quality interactions among four perennial grasses. Agron J 72:378–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Merigliano ME, Lesica P (1998) The native status of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) in the inland Northwest, USA. Natural Areas J 18:223–230

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pahkala K, Aalto M, Isolahti M, Poikola J, Jauhiainen L (2008) Large-scale energy grass farming for power plants—a case study from Ostrobothnia, Finland. Biomass Bioenergy 32:1009–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sachs APW, Coulman BE (1983) Variability in reed canarygrass collections from Eastern Canada. Crop Sci 23:1041–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sahramaa M (2003) Evaluation of reed canary grass for different end-uses and in breeding. Agric Food Sci Finland 12:227–241

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sahramaa M, Ihamäki H, Jauhiainen L (2003) Variation in biomass related variables of reed canary grass. Agric Food Sci Finland 12:213–225

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sheaffer CC, Marten GC (1995) Reed canarygrass. In: Barnes RF, Miller DA, Nelson CJ (eds) Forages volume I. An introduction to grassland agriculture. Iowa State University Press, Ames, pp 335–343

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smith KF, Casler MD (2004) The use of spatially adjusted herbage yields during the analysis of perennial forage grass trials across locations. Crop Sci 44:56–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Snaydon RW (1978) Genetic changes in pasture populations. In: Wilson JR (ed) Plant relations in pastures. CSIRO, East Melbourne, pp 253–269

    Google Scholar 

  24. Steel RGC, Torrie JH, Dickey DA (1997) Principles and procedures of statistics. A biometrical approach, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 666

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wrobel C, Coulman BE, Smith DL (2009) The potential use of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) as a biofuel crop. Acta Agric Scand Section B 59:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Mike Barker and Sam Beer for assistance in collecting reed canary grass accessions. We also thank Mark Smith, Nick Baker, and Sam Beer for assistance with harvesting and maintaining reed canary grass plots.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. US Dairy Forage Research Center, USDA-ARS, 1925 Linden Dr, Madison, WI, 53706-1108, USA

    Michael D. Casler

  2. Department of Crop and Soil Science, Cornell University, 503 Bradfield Hall, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA

    Jerome H. Cherney

  3. Center for Applied Genetic Technologies, Crop and Soil Science Department, University of Georgia, 111 Riverbend Rd, Athens, GA, 30602, USA

    E. Charles Brummer

Authors
  1. Michael D. Casler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jerome H. Cherney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. Charles Brummer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael D. Casler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Casler, M.D., Cherney, J.H. & Brummer, E.C. Biomass Yield of Naturalized Populations and Cultivars of Reed Canary Grass. Bioenerg. Res. 2, 165–173 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-009-9043-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-009-9043-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation