Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Sweet Sorghum and Sorghum × Sudangrass Hybrids as Feedstocks for Ethanol Production

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Field studies were conducted at the USDA-ARS Sugarcane Research Laboratory in southeast Louisiana to evaluate the ethanol yield potential of five sweet sorghums (Dale, M81-E, Rio, Theis, and Topper) and two non-flowering sorghum × sudangrass forage hybrids (MMR 333/27 and MMR 333/47). The sorghums were planted in the spring and harvested at 85, 101, 119, and 138 days after planting (DAP). Theoretical sugar-based ethanol yield increased for the sweet sorghums (except Rio) from 85 through 119 days, but did not significantly increase further at 138 days. The forage sorghums did not show a similar increase, though the theoretical sugar-based ethanol yield of MMR 333/47 at 138 DAP was greater than at 85 DAP. Conversely, theoretical fiber-based ethanol yields increased two-fold in the two forage sorghums from 85 to 138 DAP; a significant increase in fiber-based ethanol yield was not observed in any of the sweet sorghums over the same period. At 138 DAP, sugar-based ethanol yield of Theis (6,060 L ha−1), was greater than that of Rio or either of the two forage hybrids. Fiber-based ethanol yield of MMR 333/47 (8,860 L ha−1) was greater than that of any other variety in the test. Theoretical ethanol yield from hexose sugar and fiber components averaged across varieties was 6,500, 7,720, 9,100, and 10,810 L ha−1 at 85, 101, 119 and 138 DAP, respectively. As a complementary crop for Louisiana’s sugarcane growers, sorghum would need to be harvested not later than 120 DAP so as to not interfere with the planting of sugarcane in these fields. Both Theis and MMR 333/47 produced greater than 11,000 L ha−1 combined theoretical ethanol at 119 DAP, Theis, equally from sugar and fiber, MMR 333/47 about two-thirds from fiber. Choice of sorghum type would depend on the conversion process(s) being used at the biorefinery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Seed supplied by Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station (MAFES) Foundation Seed Stocks, Box 9811, Mississippi State, MS 39762–9811.

  2. Seed supplied by MMR Genetics, L.L.C., and are owned by Richardson Seeds, Ltd., both located at P.O. Box 60, Vega, TX, USA 79092.

  3. Earth Way® Products, 1009 Maple St., Bristol, Indiana 46507.

  4. CAMECO® Industries, Inc., 244 Highway 3266, Thibodaux, Louisiana 70301–1602.

References

  1. Ricaud R (1970) Sweet sorghum for sugar production in Louisiana. Louisiana Agriculture, Louisiana Ag. Expt. Stn., Baton Rouge, LA 14(2):4

  2. Hallmark WB, Broadhead D, Viator HP, Rabb JL, Ricaud R (1984–1985) Performance of sweet sorghum in Louisiana. LA Agric 28(2):10

    Google Scholar 

  3. Polack JA, Day DF (1982) Ethanol from sweet sorghum. J Am Soc of Sugarcane Technol 1:52–56

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lipinsky ES, Kresovich S, McClure TA, Jackson DR, Lawhon WT, Kalyoncu AA, Daniels EL (1978) Sugar crops as a source of fuels—vol I. Agricultural Research Final Report to U.S. Department of Energy. Battelle Columbus Laboratories, July 31

  5. Department of Energy (1979) The report of the alcohol fuels policy review. DOE/PE-0012, Washington, D.C., June

  6. Arthur MF, Davis M, Kresovich S, Lawhon WT, Lipinski ES, Price M, Rudolph A (1980) Research report on development of sweet sorghum as an energy crop—vol I. Agricultural Task Report to U.S. Department of Energy. Battelle Columbus Laboratories, May 31

  7. Smith GA, Bagby MO, Lewellen RT, Doney DL, Moore PH, Hills FJ, Campbell LG, Hogaboam GH, Coe GE, Freeman K (1987) Evaluation of sweet sorghum for fermentable sugar production potential. Crop Sci 27:788–793

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hill FJ, Lewellen RT, Skoyen IO (1990) Sweet sorghum cultivars for alcohol production. Calif Agric 44:14–16

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ricaud R, Arceneaux A (1990) Sweet sorghum research on biomass and sugar production in 1990. In Report of Projects, Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Department of Agronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA, pp 136–139

  10. Dolciiotti I, Mambelli S, Grandi S, Venturi G (1998) Comparison of two sorghum genotypes for sugar and fiber production. Ind Crops and Prod 7:265–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McBee GG, Creelman RA, Miller FR (1988) Ethanol yield and energy potential of stems from a spectrum of sorghum biomass types. Biomass 17:203–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. National Agriculture Statistics Service. Acreage Report. Available online at: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/viewDocumentInfo.do?documentID=1000

  13. Viator, RP, Garrison, DD, Dufrene, EO Jr, Tew, TL, Richard, EP Jr (2005) Planting method and timing effects on sugarcane yield. Online. Crop Management. doi:10.1094/CM-2005-0621-02-RS.

  14. Ricaud R, Arceneaux A, Viator HP (1988) Sweet sorghum for biomass and sugar production in Louisiana. In Report of Projects, Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Department of Agronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA, pp 167–171

  15. Pedersen JF (1996) Annual forages: new approaches for C-4 forages. In: Janick J (ed) Progress in new crops. ASHS, Alexandria, VA, pp 246–251

    Google Scholar 

  16. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Soil Series description available online at http://www2.ftw.nrcs.usda.gov/osd/dat/C/CANCIENNE.html

  17. Legendre BL, Thibaut WH (1990) Automation of analyses of sugarcane juice samples. JASSCT 10:92–100

    Google Scholar 

  18. US Department of Energy. Theoretical ethanol yield calculator. Available at http://www.eere.energy.gov/biomass/ethanol_yield_calculator.html. USDOE, Washington, DC. [accessed 1 Feb 2006].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas L. Tew.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tew, T.L., Cobill, R.M. & Richard, E.P. Evaluation of Sweet Sorghum and Sorghum × Sudangrass Hybrids as Feedstocks for Ethanol Production. Bioenerg. Res. 1, 147–152 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-008-9013-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-008-9013-y

Keywords

Navigation