Abstract
Field studies were conducted at the USDA-ARS Sugarcane Research Laboratory in southeast Louisiana to evaluate the ethanol yield potential of five sweet sorghums (Dale, M81-E, Rio, Theis, and Topper) and two non-flowering sorghum × sudangrass forage hybrids (MMR 333/27 and MMR 333/47). The sorghums were planted in the spring and harvested at 85, 101, 119, and 138 days after planting (DAP). Theoretical sugar-based ethanol yield increased for the sweet sorghums (except Rio) from 85 through 119 days, but did not significantly increase further at 138 days. The forage sorghums did not show a similar increase, though the theoretical sugar-based ethanol yield of MMR 333/47 at 138 DAP was greater than at 85 DAP. Conversely, theoretical fiber-based ethanol yields increased two-fold in the two forage sorghums from 85 to 138 DAP; a significant increase in fiber-based ethanol yield was not observed in any of the sweet sorghums over the same period. At 138 DAP, sugar-based ethanol yield of Theis (6,060 L ha−1), was greater than that of Rio or either of the two forage hybrids. Fiber-based ethanol yield of MMR 333/47 (8,860 L ha−1) was greater than that of any other variety in the test. Theoretical ethanol yield from hexose sugar and fiber components averaged across varieties was 6,500, 7,720, 9,100, and 10,810 L ha−1 at 85, 101, 119 and 138 DAP, respectively. As a complementary crop for Louisiana’s sugarcane growers, sorghum would need to be harvested not later than 120 DAP so as to not interfere with the planting of sugarcane in these fields. Both Theis and MMR 333/47 produced greater than 11,000 L ha−1 combined theoretical ethanol at 119 DAP, Theis, equally from sugar and fiber, MMR 333/47 about two-thirds from fiber. Choice of sorghum type would depend on the conversion process(s) being used at the biorefinery.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Seed supplied by Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station (MAFES) Foundation Seed Stocks, Box 9811, Mississippi State, MS 39762–9811.
Seed supplied by MMR Genetics, L.L.C., and are owned by Richardson Seeds, Ltd., both located at P.O. Box 60, Vega, TX, USA 79092.
Earth Way® Products, 1009 Maple St., Bristol, Indiana 46507.
CAMECO® Industries, Inc., 244 Highway 3266, Thibodaux, Louisiana 70301–1602.
References
Ricaud R (1970) Sweet sorghum for sugar production in Louisiana. Louisiana Agriculture, Louisiana Ag. Expt. Stn., Baton Rouge, LA 14(2):4
Hallmark WB, Broadhead D, Viator HP, Rabb JL, Ricaud R (1984–1985) Performance of sweet sorghum in Louisiana. LA Agric 28(2):10
Polack JA, Day DF (1982) Ethanol from sweet sorghum. J Am Soc of Sugarcane Technol 1:52–56
Lipinsky ES, Kresovich S, McClure TA, Jackson DR, Lawhon WT, Kalyoncu AA, Daniels EL (1978) Sugar crops as a source of fuels—vol I. Agricultural Research Final Report to U.S. Department of Energy. Battelle Columbus Laboratories, July 31
Department of Energy (1979) The report of the alcohol fuels policy review. DOE/PE-0012, Washington, D.C., June
Arthur MF, Davis M, Kresovich S, Lawhon WT, Lipinski ES, Price M, Rudolph A (1980) Research report on development of sweet sorghum as an energy crop—vol I. Agricultural Task Report to U.S. Department of Energy. Battelle Columbus Laboratories, May 31
Smith GA, Bagby MO, Lewellen RT, Doney DL, Moore PH, Hills FJ, Campbell LG, Hogaboam GH, Coe GE, Freeman K (1987) Evaluation of sweet sorghum for fermentable sugar production potential. Crop Sci 27:788–793
Hill FJ, Lewellen RT, Skoyen IO (1990) Sweet sorghum cultivars for alcohol production. Calif Agric 44:14–16
Ricaud R, Arceneaux A (1990) Sweet sorghum research on biomass and sugar production in 1990. In Report of Projects, Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Department of Agronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA, pp 136–139
Dolciiotti I, Mambelli S, Grandi S, Venturi G (1998) Comparison of two sorghum genotypes for sugar and fiber production. Ind Crops and Prod 7:265–272
McBee GG, Creelman RA, Miller FR (1988) Ethanol yield and energy potential of stems from a spectrum of sorghum biomass types. Biomass 17:203–211
National Agriculture Statistics Service. Acreage Report. Available online at: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/viewDocumentInfo.do?documentID=1000
Viator, RP, Garrison, DD, Dufrene, EO Jr, Tew, TL, Richard, EP Jr (2005) Planting method and timing effects on sugarcane yield. Online. Crop Management. doi:10.1094/CM-2005-0621-02-RS.
Ricaud R, Arceneaux A, Viator HP (1988) Sweet sorghum for biomass and sugar production in Louisiana. In Report of Projects, Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Department of Agronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA, pp 167–171
Pedersen JF (1996) Annual forages: new approaches for C-4 forages. In: Janick J (ed) Progress in new crops. ASHS, Alexandria, VA, pp 246–251
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Soil Series description available online at http://www2.ftw.nrcs.usda.gov/osd/dat/C/CANCIENNE.html
Legendre BL, Thibaut WH (1990) Automation of analyses of sugarcane juice samples. JASSCT 10:92–100
US Department of Energy. Theoretical ethanol yield calculator. Available at http://www.eere.energy.gov/biomass/ethanol_yield_calculator.html. USDOE, Washington, DC. [accessed 1 Feb 2006].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tew, T.L., Cobill, R.M. & Richard, E.P. Evaluation of Sweet Sorghum and Sorghum × Sudangrass Hybrids as Feedstocks for Ethanol Production. Bioenerg. Res. 1, 147–152 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-008-9013-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-008-9013-y